IGX

Copenhagen dealer gets in debt to psychotic Chetnik loving Serb. A fantastic first film with that rare edge some great directors first films have.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/pusher

This socialist fgt makes good films. This one is about the Spanish Civil War. I completely disagree with the narrative but i enjoyed it and it was well worth watching. Just know Franco was a great man and his enemies were scum.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/land_and_freedom/

Not surprisingly it is about Algiers and Battles. Told from the revolutionaries side but whew is it rough... one of my top 10 films (not just war either) but I just watched today. And the Criterion has super cool additions, get that copy. https://www.amazon.com/Battle-Algiers-Criterion-Collection/dp...

Japs and Irish are ok too.

If a 12 yr old can consent to a sex change, why can't they consent to sex?

History of a group of French Paras from Vietnam to Algeria. One of the best military histories I have read. Can't recommend it enough.

Dumb. This is a fifth order concern with a huge political cost. I pray they let this go.

Burn The Coal Pay The Toll

"Right decisions appended to wrong rationalizations"

I am a huge believer in firearm possession by citizens and would move to the most gun friendly jurisdiction I could afford. In the 90s I worked for a while in Denver. Grew up and still live in the Balto-Washington corridor. In one city you might see rifles in gun racks in the back of a pickup truck...

As the IGx resident originalist, I note that the Second Amendment's explicit purpose was a military* one. Narrowly construing that amendment, one might restrict gun owners' rights to possess only military style weapons. Construing it a little more broadly, the government might allow/encourage citiz...

I AM NOT AN ORIGINALIST. I HAVE REPEATEDLY SAID SO. It's true, he has repeatedly said so. Johno's the originalist. But Benny, if you're not an originalist, why do you keep deploying arguments about what militia's were originally intended for, the original thinking about standing armies, etc? It's c...

NO THEY ARE TO FIGHT FOREIGN MILITARIES.

AND YES, OPPOSE THE FED GOV IF REQUIRED.

Your argument that the 2nd is vitiated into ineffectiveness by the current size of the military is wrong and dumb. It does not follow in any way, shape or form except political convenience and bad rhetoric. There is no lawgic trap that we must either disband the standing army or allow shitlibs to g...

Just lulz at shitlibs with their mass of ABSOLUTELY EXISTENT RIGHTS which are nowhere in any text dead certain the one written down doesn't exist. Aborters, fags, trannys, miscegenators, porn lovers, buyers of condoms, school integrators etc etc etc has the entire weight of the gov on their side. Gu...

Also, a "militia" can't have "military" weapons. As if the Founders hadn't just fought the baddest military in the world with a citizen militia. And intended the Amendment to preserve a civilian militia capable of that for perpetuity. If you are an Originalist, you'll know that ...

Also, a "militia" can't have "military" weapons. As if the Founders hadn't just fought the baddest military in the world with a citizen militia. And intended the Amendment to preserve a civilian militia capable of that for perpetuity. If you are an Originalist, you'll know that ...

Well I am not an originalist by your definition.

And your lawgic trap is lame.

None of that follows.

And I want the military shrunk to a fraction of its current size and massive withdrawal from the world stage.

Also, a "militia" can't have "military" weapons. As if the Founders hadn't just fought the baddest military in the world with a citizen militia. And intended the Amendment to preserve a civilian militia capable of that for perpetuity. Even on the terms of their arg this is stupid...

My de facto white ethnostate is coming!

Unless they decide on a federal ban then it is civil war.

Uh I brought it up.

1965 was the Imm Act which we were assured would not change the demographics of the country. Either way, they don't have it now. And if SCOTUS were to rule explicitly that States can restrict firearm ownership as they wish, you would see massive population shift of whites to gun friendly states. And...

They were a gov operation. He was a democrat and buds with Bill.

No. If SCOTUS gave individual states the right to make their own gun laws, the movement of whites to pro gun states would be like nothing we have ever seen. The demographics there would reverse and return to pre 1965 sane levels.

Maybe you can point me to an originalist's opinion that is as unhinged as Obergefell Not likely. I may not be able to find one on the books. Obergefell is a high bar. :happiness: It was, as I said above, the right decision rationalized with the wrong (or non-existent) argument. ...or as corrupt &am...

No way bat shit crazy Shia Le Beef isn't a result of his moms whoring him out for gangbangs.