Hillary & Chelsea...

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

Post Reply
User avatar
johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7817
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by johno » Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:50 am

...both exposed national secrets to foreign powers. And Obama commutes Chelsea's sentence, but no pardon for Hillary. Yet.

Libs - explain the commute rationale.

Image
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats

User avatar
DrDonkeyLove
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8034
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
Location: Deep in a well

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by DrDonkeyLove » Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:39 am

johno wrote:...both exposed national secrets to foreign powers. And Obama commutes Chelsea's sentence, but no pardon for Hillary. Yet.

Libs - explain the commute rationale.

Image
Future dating plans after Friday?
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party

User avatar
Testiclaw
Top
Posts: 1844
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:30 pm
Location: Between the thighs, taint, and retractable claw.

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Testiclaw » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:49 am

Hmmmm...I guess a Marry/Fuck/Kill could be used here.

Hillary. Chelsea. Bradley.

Who you got?
My cousin is a redheaded german-mexican, we call him a beanerschnitzel

User avatar
Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 20569
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Turdacious » Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:19 am

I'm surprised at the support this other just commuted terrorist received: http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/18/politics/ ... ez-rivera/
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

bennyonesix
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2710
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by bennyonesix » Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:36 am

That is completely inexplicable under any political ideology other than hatred of the US.

Still not worse than Bill's last few days. But we have time.

bennyonesix
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2710
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by bennyonesix » Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:21 am

I reckon Native Americans don't have enough votes to matter because Peltier is less worse than the fgts that just got pardoned.

http://m.democracynow.org/web_exclusives/3124

User avatar
nafod
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11479
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: Looking in your window

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by nafod » Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:13 pm

New sentencing guideline..."7 years solitary plus a sex change"
Don’t believe everything you think.

User avatar
Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 10837
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Grandpa's Spells » Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:42 pm

Obama explained the rationale on Manning. What's the counterargument? Genuinely curious.
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar
Herv100
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3696
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Herv100 » Thu Jan 19, 2017 3:27 pm

Turdacious wrote:I'm surprised at the support this other just commuted terrorist received: http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/18/politics/ ... ez-rivera/
This was ridiculous. Of course no coverage of this by msm
Image

dead man walking
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6797
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by dead man walking » Thu Jan 19, 2017 3:55 pm

does the new york times count as main stream?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/17/us/o ... ivera.html

or the washington post?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... 3da840052a

herv, donald just tweeted that your post is fake news
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.

User avatar
johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7817
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by johno » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:04 pm

Grandpa's Spells wrote:What's the counterargument? Genuinely curious.
I asked first, you lazy fuck.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats

User avatar
Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 10837
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Grandpa's Spells » Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:33 pm

johno wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:What's the counterargument? Genuinely curious.
I asked first, you lazy fuck.
Obama explained it at some length yesterday. http://time.com/4638194/president-obama ... onference/
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar
DrDonkeyLove
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8034
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
Location: Deep in a well

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by DrDonkeyLove » Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:57 pm

Grandpa's Spells wrote:Obama explained the rationale on Manning. What's the counterargument? Genuinely curious.
Am not overly vexed by this.

Instead of why not pardon "her", my question is why should he/she be pardoned? My answer is that he's pandering to the LGBTQIA-IGx crowd because Obama is a pandering MoFo.

Are Manning's disclosures more or less damaging to the USA than Jonathan Pollard's? I don't know the answer but truly wonder.

Too bad he didn't pardon Nakoula Basseley Nakoula who made the "Innocence of Muslims video", the only poor bastard to bear any responsibility for the Benghazi atrocity.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party

bennyonesix
Sgt. Major
Posts: 2710
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:25 am

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by bennyonesix » Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:09 pm

dead man walking wrote:does the new york times count as main stream?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/17/us/o ... ivera.html

or the washington post?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... 3da840052a

herv, donald just tweeted that your post is fake news
Tendentious. You know his point was an almost complete lack of coverage AND media AND poltical class outrage. This is just rank dishonesty on your part. As you well know, if a Rightist (a militiaman or anti abortion activist etc) received this, the coverage would be wall to wall.

The larger point is that shitlib politicians and shitlibs and shitlib media to not attack the Left no matter how radical or murderous.

In fact, as we have seen, they support them via their silence on issues like this.

So please address the real issue or stfu.

User avatar
nafod
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11479
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: Looking in your window

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by nafod » Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:14 pm

DrDonkeyLove wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Obama explained the rationale on Manning. What's the counterargument? Genuinely curious.
Am not overly vexed by this.

Instead of why not pardon "her", my question is why should he/she be pardoned? My answer is that he's pandering to the LGBTQIA-IGx crowd because Obama is a pandering MoFo.

Are Manning's disclosures more or less damaging to the USA than Jonathan Pollard's?
I'm not a fan of Manning, but on it's behalf, he didn't do it for money or a foreign power, saw it as a whistleblower act for us merkins, and she admitted full guilt.

Jonathan Pollard sold his secrets for gain to a foreign power (having shopped them around to a bunch) while keeping it all a secret. Not knowing what has been stolen is a huge deal. We often cut deals with the perp in order to get them to cooperate on telling us what they told them.
Don’t believe everything you think.

User avatar
Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 20569
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Turdacious » Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:17 pm

nafod wrote:
DrDonkeyLove wrote:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Obama explained the rationale on Manning. What's the counterargument? Genuinely curious.
Am not overly vexed by this.

Instead of why not pardon "her", my question is why should he/she be pardoned? My answer is that he's pandering to the LGBTQIA-IGx crowd because Obama is a pandering MoFo.

Are Manning's disclosures more or less damaging to the USA than Jonathan Pollard's?
I'm not a fan of Manning, but on it's behalf, he didn't do it for money or a foreign power, saw it as a whistleblower act for us merkins, and she admitted full guilt.

Jonathan Pollard sold his secrets for gain to a foreign power (having shopped them around to a bunch) while keeping it all a secret. Not knowing what has been stolen is a huge deal. We often cut deals with the perp in order to get them to cooperate on telling us what they told them.
I wonder what impact the difficulty of protecting a high profile prisoner in Oz while providing a type of medical care the military isn't used to providing had. I'd imagine the MPs are happy to be rid of Manning.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar
Herv100
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3696
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Herv100 » Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:27 pm

dead man walking wrote:does the new york times count as main stream?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/17/us/o ... ivera.html

or the washington post?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... 3da840052a

herv, donald just tweeted that your post is fake news
I go by Facebook, shitdick. Nothing from CNN, NBC, Fox, etc that I saw. What's funny is, the only places I saw it were so-called "fake news" sites.
Image

User avatar
Herv100
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3696
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by Herv100 » Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:33 pm

bennyonesix wrote:
dead man walking wrote:does the new york times count as main stream?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/17/us/o ... ivera.html

or the washington post?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... 3da840052a

herv, donald just tweeted that your post is fake news
Tendentious. You know his point was an almost complete lack of coverage AND media AND poltical class outrage. This is just rank dishonesty on your part. As you well know, if a Rightist (a militiaman or anti abortion activist etc) received this, the coverage would be wall to wall.

The larger point is that shitlib politicians and shitlibs and shitlib media to not attack the Left no matter how radical or murderous.

In fact, as we have seen, they support them via their silence on issues like this.

So please address the real issue or stfu.
You know he had to go looking for those with Google and they weren't popping up on any news feeds. In other words, you had to already know about the story to go find it with Google.
Image

dead man walking
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6797
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm

Re: Hillary & Chelsea...

Post by dead man walking » Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:37 pm

Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.

Post Reply