IGX

Posted: **Sun Oct 29, 2017 5:52 pm**

We've abandoned the cities, paid trillions in taxes, had ourselves beaten and robbed and raped and employed generations of useless black women in inefficient make work positions because of young black men. Just admit it. Admit all the shit effects of blacks. US whites are no more violent or criminal than northwest euros. Probably less so because Obama and Bush and Clinton all had the DOJ fold mexicans into whites whenever possible.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/st ... d-violent/

Posted: **Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:32 am**

Trump is just terrible and going to jail amirite guyz? Yuck yuck yuck

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:05 am**

bennyonesix wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2017 5:52 pmJust admit it. Admit all the shit effects of blacks.

There's a striking list or table in one of the late chapters in this 1956 book:

The author discusses what would be the most attractive qualities for a black man and a black woman to have, attractive to a slaveholder. What makes the list striking is how it compares to the most common stereotypes. Food for thought.

I'll post it if I can find it – not gonna buy the book for it though. (The copy I read was from the library.) But it's a good book. Very sober and measured, not sensationalist at all.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:55 am**

Yeah we absolutely should have picked our own damn cotton. But cavaliers and planters were greedy as fuck.

Are you implying that these characteristics are absent west afreekan blacks?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:26 am**

bennyonesix wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:55 amAre you implying that these characteristics are absent west afreekan blacks?

I don't know shit about West Africa. I can find it on a globe, and I think Aubrey & Maturin touched there in one or more of the Patrick O'Brian novels, and that's it.

I'm implying, or inferring from Stampp's list, that a lot of the behaviors that "we" stereotypically ascribe to "them", look like culturally-imposed top-down expectations from slaveowners. Slavery went on for a couple hundred years, Jim Crow ended roughly 50 yrs ago, and not all at once either. Chicago banks were still offering only predatory mortgage loans to black families as recently as the 80s. It's not unreasonable to think it could take a few generations for a population to adapt.

I can explain more things to you, but you'll need to change the thread title to "Ask a shitlib".

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:53 am**

So you claim ignorance on the threshold question and yet continue to offer your opinion?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:04 am**

Isn't this IGX??

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:26 am**

B16- have you ever even talked to a girl?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:21 pm**

Let's assume you're right B16, what's to be done? Whatever % DNA is involved can't be changed. Can only change individual souls one at a time. 2 suggestions:
1) Modify social safety net assistance programs to incentivize 2 parent families
2) Jobs!
2a) There used to be a plethora of decent manufacturing jobs in the inner city and there can be again. I'm acquainted with a guy who owns a terrifically successful manufacturing facility in the heart of Chicago. He's doing very well for himself and the inner city people working there have real jobs that will support a family - not just fry cooking at Popeye's money.

2 parents + a good job goes a long way towards improving children's lives.

#1 is anathema to Libs and #2 is tough when the Lib colonizers are busy improving neighborhoods and shipping the blacks off to failing inner suburbs/reservations.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:54 pm**

Just once, Benny, I'd like you to look at how you've been manipulated by right wing media, staring at all the shiny, flashy kneeling football players, while allowing your constitutional rights to be eroded by your elected Republican leaders.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm**

Shafpocalypse Now wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:54 pm Just once, Benny, I'd like you to look at how you've been manipulated by right wing media, staring at all the shiny, flashy kneeling football players, while allowing your constitutional rights to be eroded by your elected Republican leaders.

The Patriot Act is leftist legislation. Any conservatives who support it are fake, including the Bush's. The only "right wing media" that supports the patriot act is Fox News, owned by a globalist.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:07 pm**

Herv100 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm owned by a globalist.

using the internet to complain abou globalism.

how's that for cognitive dissonance?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:45 pm**

dead man walking wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:07 pm
Herv100 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm owned by a globalist.
using the internet to complain abou globalism.

how's that for cognitive dissonance?

Cognitive dissonance is not realizing that there can be global trade with each country retaining their sovereignty if they wish.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:07 pm**

Shafpocalypse Now wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:54 pm Just once, Benny, I'd like you to look at how you've been manipulated by right wing media, staring at all the shiny, flashy kneeling football players, while allowing your constitutional rights to be eroded by your elected Republican leaders.

I hate Republicans more than you. I have ever defended their complicity in ruining this country. Guns and abortion were used to get Nafta and immigration, yes. And 9/11 was used to ruin our liberties.

If I had but one bullet and were faced by both an enemy and a traitor, I would let the traitor have it. -Codreanu

You going to answer my question?

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:08 pm**

dead man walking wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:07 pm
Herv100 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm owned by a globalist.
using the internet to complain abou globalism.

how's that for cognitive dissonance?

Being dead avg iq means mistaking technology for globalism

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:24 pm**

Herv100 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm
Shafpocalypse Now wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:54 pm Just once, Benny, I'd like you to look at how you've been manipulated by right wing media, staring at all the shiny, flashy kneeling football players, while allowing your constitutional rights to be eroded by your elected Republican leaders.
The Patriot Act is leftist legislation. Any conservatives who support it are fake, including the Bush's. The only "right wing media" that supports the patriot act is Fox News, owned by a globalist.

Once again, my as yet unpublished theory about people that use the term "leftist" as opposed to Dem, liberal, etc. has another confirmed data point.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:33 pm**

bennyonesix wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:08 pm
dead man walking wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:07 pm
Herv100 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm owned by a globalist.
using the internet to complain abou globalism.

how's that for cognitive dissonance?
Being dead avg iq means mistaking technology for globalism

how about this: igxers having to put up with a russian doctor living in australia?

that's globalism.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:46 pm**

Globalism:

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:37 pm**

Yes I Have Balls wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:24 pm
Herv100 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm
Shafpocalypse Now wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:54 pm Just once, Benny, I'd like you to look at how you've been manipulated by right wing media, staring at all the shiny, flashy kneeling football players, while allowing your constitutional rights to be eroded by your elected Republican leaders.
The Patriot Act is leftist legislation. Any conservatives who support it are fake, including the Bush's. The only "right wing media" that supports the patriot act is Fox News, owned by a globalist.
Once again, my as yet unpublished theory about people that use the term "leftist" as opposed to Dem, liberal, etc. has another confirmed data point.

We need to tighten up our language regarding the philosophies of politicians who truly support civil liberties vs. those who either give it lip service or don't really believe it that much anyway. The Republican/Democrat & Conservative/Liberal nomenclature doesn't work in this area.

John McCain ≠ Rand Paul yet both are called conservatives. Nancy Pelosi ≠ Dennis Kucinich yet both were staunch liberals.

Posted: **Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:59 pm**

Herv100 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:28 pm
Shafpocalypse Now wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:54 pm Just once, Benny, I'd like you to look at how you've been manipulated by right wing media, staring at all the shiny, flashy kneeling football players, while allowing your constitutional rights to be eroded by your elected Republican leaders.
The Patriot Act is leftist legislation. Any conservatives who support it are fake, including the Bush's. The only "right wing media" that supports the patriot act is Fox News, owned by a globalist.

Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, ‘Rain Man,’ look Kellyann, act Kellyann, not Kellyann. Count toothpicks to your cards. Autistic, sure. Not Kellyann. You know Tom Hanks, ‘Forrest Gump.’ Slow, yes. Kellyann, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain’t Kellyann. You went full Kellyann, man. Never go full Kellyann.

Posted: **Wed Nov 01, 2017 3:55 am**

DrDonkeyLove wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:21 pm Let's assume you're right B16, what's to be done? Whatever % DNA is involved can't be changed. Can only change individual souls one at a time. 2 suggestions:
1) Modify social safety net assistance programs to incentivize 2 parent families
2) Jobs!
2a) There used to be a plethora of decent manufacturing jobs in the inner city and there can be again. I'm acquainted with a guy who owns a terrifically successful manufacturing facility in the heart of Chicago. He's doing very well for himself and the inner city people working there have real jobs that will support a family - not just fry cooking at Popeye's money.

2 parents + a good job goes a long way towards improving children's lives.

#1 is anathema to Libs and #2 is tough when the Lib colonizers are busy improving neighborhoods and shipping the blacks off to failing inner suburbs/reservations.

Restrictive covenants would solve the majority of social problems in US today.

That and ending immigration would solve the wage issue.

Posted: **Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:02 pm**

Sometime back a girl Benny liked (and who probably didn't know Benny existed) started dating a black guy and Benny's still pissed.

Posted: **Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:40 pm**

bennyonesix wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2017 3:55 am ending immigration would solve the wage issue.

and undermine rural health care and cripple agriculture, both of which rely heavily on immigrant workers.

Posted: **Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:41 pm**

and undermine rural health care and cripple agriculture,

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... k9i5lNpk5j

I dont know about rural health but farms can and will become mechanized.

Posted: **Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:48 pm**

my neighbors run bigger farming operations than they used to, and they rely on capital (i.e. sophisticated equipment) far more than before, but most have undocumented immigrants working for them. that's true for pretty much all agriculture everywhere.

re foreign doctors:

About a quarter of all doctors in the United States are foreign medical graduates [and were residents of foreign countries when they arrived here]

foreign medical graduates are more likely to practice in geographic areas of the country where there are physician shortages (typically nonurban areas).

from an oct nytimes article.

so the irony is: white trump voters in rural areas are more likely to be served by immigrant m.d.s

all of the residents who have worked with my oncologist during the four years he has treated me have been foreign--east european or asian.

IGX

Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks

Re: Just once i'd like a shitlib to admit the massive cultural cost incurred by young blacks