Page 1 of 2
Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:09 am
by Herv100
None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... onors.html
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:21 am
by Master_Blaster
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:39 am
by Fuzzy Dunlop
Master_Blaster wrote:
Miss understood youths?
They ran out of orange drank.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 4:35 am
by Protobuilder
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:21 am
by Croatoa
Geblonski Murray
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:39 am
by Master_Blaster
Four black kids......
Shocking.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:45 am
by Protobuilder
If Obama had nephews and a niece...
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:39 pm
by Kazuya Mishima
Oh, look everybody...it's the fucking niggers again.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 1:00 pm
by DrDonkeyLove
Kazuya Mishima wrote:Oh, look everybody...it's the fucking niggers again.
That Geblonski kid sounds Polish.
If I was black and my mom named me Geblonski, I'd kill someone, probably her.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:19 am
by lasalle
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:55 am
by Protobuilder
Reading through that page makes me LOL. Then, it makes me sad when I realize that people aren't kidding.
Also,
https://www.facebook.com/LeSLie.DaniLLe
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:51 pm
by Kazuya Mishima
Some fucking nigger wrote:love ya bra right or wrong knw that why people speakin on yu bra only thing they knw is ya name they on the outside lookin in blood thicker than water and im with mines ok everybody wanna talk but wasnt nobody helpin yu out dnt add up bra
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:20 pm
by Grandpa's Spells
Herv100 wrote:None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
That's typical US journalism policy, unless race is relevant.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:26 pm
by The Ginger Beard Man
Why is race almost never relevant in black on white crime, but almost always in white on black?
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:27 pm
by TerryB
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
That's typical US journalism policy, unless race is relevant.
But race is only relevant to them when crime is happening in one direction. When it happens the other direction, somehow race is always irrelevant.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 5:11 pm
by Herv100
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
That's typical US journalism policy, unless race is relevant.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?secti ... id=9303654
This is the first murder story that came up in a search, and race is not involved. Troll on, dork
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 5:24 pm
by Grandpa's Spells
Herv100 wrote:Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
That's typical US journalism policy, unless race is relevant.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?secti ... id=9303654
This is the first murder story that came up in a search, and race is not involved. Troll on, dork
There's no mention of race of the victim or attacker in that story.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 5:51 pm
by Herv100
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
That's typical US journalism policy, unless race is relevant.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?secti ... id=9303654
This is the first murder story that came up in a search, and race is not involved. Troll on, dork
There's no mention of race of the victim or attacker in that story.
Are you this dumb?
There a huge picture of the killer at the top of the story, despite race not being a factor in the case. You just said it's policy to not show a picture in that situation. So you were wrong and just talking out of your ass with your affirmative action trolling.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:07 pm
by Grandpa's Spells
Herv100 wrote:Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
That's typical US journalism policy, unless race is relevant.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?secti ... id=9303654
This is the first murder story that came up in a search, and race is not involved. Troll on, dork
There's no mention of race of the victim or attacker in that story.
Are you this dumb?
There a huge picture of the killer at the top of the story, despite race not being a factor in the case. You just said it's policy to not show a picture in that situation. So you were wrong and just talking out of your ass with your affirmative action trolling.
I'm wondering if I should be more concerned about you than I am about Rant. You understand that in a crime, there is a perpetrator and a victim, and that unless you describe both parties by race, you aren't really providing the information that aggrieved white conservatives really want out there.
This is a photo of a man who looks vaguely Polynesian. The woman is not described, but based on her name will be Hispanic, white, or black. I'm not sure how you think this violates the news industry's tendency to not describe race in crimes unless it is relevant.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:24 pm
by Herv100
1. I said most stories about the case in the OP at the time didn't SHOW PICTURES of the killers
2. You said its unofficial policy to not show the pictures of suspects unless it's a racial crime
3. I posted the first murder story that came up, which featured a picture of the suspect in a non racial crime, proving you're full of shit
4. You rambled on about conservatives, proving you're just doing your usual devil's advocate trolling
I could post hundreds of news stories about murders with no racial motive that all show a mugshot of the suspect, but I'm not going to waste my time on your obtuse ass
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:36 pm
by Grandpa's Spells
Herv100 wrote:2. You said its unofficial policy to not show the pictures of suspects unless it's a racial crime
No I didn't.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:45 pm
by DPR
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:55 pm
by Herv100
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:2. You said its unofficial policy to not show the pictures of suspects unless it's a racial crime
No I didn't.
Yes you did. It's right here:
Grandpa's Spells wrote:Herv100 wrote:None of the American press coverage shows pictures of the killers or even describes them.
That's typical US journalism policy, unless race is relevant.
You seem to be clinging to the fact I wrote "or even describes them". Guess what? A mugshot is both a picture and a visual description. And damn near any murder case story you find, racially motivated or not, has a mugshot or picture.
Despite that, if you're going to respond to only one part of a sentence but not another, you should probably clarify that in the future for your trolling escapades.
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:58 pm
by TerryB
BOOM
Re: Misunderstood Youths Kill Another WWII Vet
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:22 pm
by Grandpa's Spells
Herv, here's the Chicago Tribune's policy, for example, which is typical:
It's the newspaper's sound general policy not to mention race in a story, whether about crime or anything else, unless it has some clear relevance to the topic.
So when you complained they weren't including the race of the people involved, I said that's normal.
HTH