IGX

Turdacious wrote:What the fuck is a Sean Hannity? Are you crazy?

nafod wrote:Discuss this fake but accurate news story

powerlifter54 wrote:On a related note the usual suspects line up to protect the Obama who is outraged that "the Russians", who he said were not a threat to Romney and told an emissary to tell Vlad he could be more flexible after the election, hacked a Private Entity, the DNC, but did nothing when Millions of Government personnel files were compromised.

This is going to blow up in the left's face.

“We will obviously be talking about the hacking, but the main thing is the whole issue of cybersecurity,” the committee’s Republican chairman, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, said ahead of the hearing. “Right now we have no policy, no strategy to counter cyberattacks.”

The officials declined to describe the intelligence obtained about the involvement of a third-party in passing on leaked material to WikiLeaks, saying they did not want to reveal how the U.S. government had obtained the information.

powerlifter54 wrote:On a related note the usual suspects line up to protect the Obama who is outraged that "the Russians", who he said were not a threat to Romney and told an emissary to tell Vlad he could be more flexible after the election, hacked a Private Entity, the DNC, but did nothing when Millions of Government personnel files were compromised.

This is going to blow up in the left's face.

“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (D.C.) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker told BuzzFeed in an email.

According to one intelligence official who spoke to the publication, no U.S. intelligence agency has performed its own forensics analysis on the hacked servers.

Instead, the official said, the bureau and other agencies have relied on analysis done by the third-party security firm CrowdStrike, which investigated the breach for the DNC.

“Crowdstrike is pretty good. There’s no reason to believe that anything that they have concluded is not accurate,” the intelligence official told BuzzFeed.

How did NBC get "an exclusive look into the top secret report he (Obama) was presented?" Who gave them this report and why? Politics!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 6, 2017

tonkadtx wrote: This is a very legitimate question by Trump, no matter what you think of him. How did NBC get a look at this info before he got his briefing?

tonkadtx wrote:How did NBC get a look at this info before he got his briefing?

tonkadtx wrote:There's a difference between leaks and leaks of classified and top secret information. Snowden and Manning could explain that to you. I think full disclosure and holding the Gov't accountable is great. However, this gives the appearance of being leaked for political purposes.

dead man walking wrote:

tonkadtx wrote: This is a very legitimate question by Trump, no matter what you think of him. How did NBC get a look at this info before he got his briefing?

not a question, but just bullshit whining.

donald knows all about leaks and is happy to leak himself when it suits him.

nafod wrote:

tonkadtx wrote:There's a difference between leaks and leaks of classified and top secret information. Snowden and Manning could explain that to you. I think full disclosure and holding the Gov't accountable is great. However, this gives the appearance of being leaked for political purposes.

Trump has avoided intelligence briefings, has not requested briefings specific to the cybersecurity issue, and is working to undermine the credibility of the intelligence community by teaming with Sean Hannity to cite Julian Assange as a credible witness on all this shit.

So...fuck Donald Trump for his own ignorance

I cannot believe this malignant clown is going to be POTUS in a few days

nafod wrote:

tonkadtx wrote:There's a difference between leaks and leaks of classified and top secret information. Snowden and Manning could explain that to you. I think full disclosure and holding the Gov't accountable is great. However, this gives the appearance of being leaked for political purposes.

Trump has avoided intelligence briefings, has not requested briefings specific to the cybersecurity issue, and is working to undermine the credibility of the intelligence community by teaming with Sean Hannity to cite Julian Assange as a credible witness on all this shit.

So...fuck Donald Trump for his own ignorance

I cannot believe this malignant clown is going to be POTUS in a few days

Herv100 wrote:

nafod wrote:

tonkadtx wrote:There's a difference between leaks and leaks of classified and top secret information. Snowden and Manning could explain that to you. I think full disclosure and holding the Gov't accountable is great. However, this gives the appearance of being leaked for political purposes.

Trump has avoided intelligence briefings, has not requested briefings specific to the cybersecurity issue, and is working to undermine the credibility of the intelligence community by teaming with Sean Hannity to cite Julian Assange as a credible witness on all this shit.

So...fuck Donald Trump for his own ignorance

I cannot believe this malignant clown is going to be POTUS in a few days

Because he's going to clean house in the intelligence organizations. He doesn't want to hear from asswipes that are going give him bullshit info about how we need to continue the Cheney/Obama/Saudi foreign policy.

Oh, and please keep up the (real) whining about Trump winning and your decrepit whore losing. Your liberal tears are fucking delicious.

This isn't about policy suggestions, this is about facts gained by the intelligence experts, you know, like the guys that sacrificed their lives in Benghazi.

tonkadtx wrote:...and the other two were former Navy Seals working as security contractors.

In November 2012, senior U.S. intelligence officials said that Woods and Doherty were actually CIA contractors, not State Department security officers as had been previously reported,[30] and that the two men, together with other CIA security officers, played a pivotal role in defending the besieged US Special Mission in Benghazi.[31]

Herv100 wrote: Your liberal tears are fucking delicious.

tonkadtx wrote:Your assertion was that the guys who died in Benghazi were there "gaining facts".

Herv100 wrote:Sorry your nation-building(murdering) policies(only possible with the traitorous CIA) are soon coming to an end. They'll be no more hospitals for you to blow up.