roger ailes now burns in hell
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 1:18 pm
his fat will drip into the fire for all eternity
"...overflowing with foulmouthed ignorance."
http://www.irongarmx.net/phpbbdev/
buckethead wrote:IMG_1717.JPG
^This from the guy who rationalized Fidel's oppression.dead man walking wrote:he was a 70-yr-old toad lookalike using his position to coerce sex out of his female employees. the blistering flames should lick his shriveled balls forever.
his "news" operation is an evangelical crusade of divisiveness and conflict.
he wife said he was a "loving husband," though.
I hate Ailes because I feel the journalism he fostered is often dishonest, blatantly biased and pandering. The fact that he harassed women and presided over a culture of such harassment doesn't endear him to me either.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
"rationalized fidel's oppression" is incorrect.johno wrote:^This from the guy who rationalized Fidel's oppression.dead man walking wrote:he was a 70-yr-old toad lookalike using his position to coerce sex out of his female employees. the blistering flames should lick his shriveled balls forever.
his "news" operation is an evangelical crusade of divisiveness and conflict.
he wife said he was a "loving husband," though.
dead man walking wrote:"rationalized fidel's oppression" is incorrect.johno wrote:^This from the guy who rationalized Fidel's oppression.dead man walking wrote:he was a 70-yr-old toad lookalike using his position to coerce sex out of his female employees. the blistering flames should lick his shriveled balls forever.
his "news" operation is an evangelical crusade of divisiveness and conflict.
he wife said he was a "loving husband," though.
i simply noted that there was an underlying reason for fidel's rise to power: the tyrrany of batista.
Sexual harassment and assault. He was one creepy Bill Cosby-level dude.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
seeahill wrote:I hate Ailes because I feel the journalism he fostered is often dishonest, blatantly biased and pandering.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
So he drugged & raped women? Was that the accusation?nafod wrote:Sexual harassment and assault. He was one creepy Bill Cosby-level dude.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
Agreed. For the most part. I'm watching Fox now, a daytime talk show, Fox Specialists, four people shouting angrily about the mainstream media. Ignoring news CNN is reporting from NYT.johno wrote:seeahill wrote:I hate Ailes because I feel the journalism he fostered is often dishonest, blatantly biased and pandering.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
This is what puzzles me. For example, I might think that Arianna Huffington's journalism is often dishonest, biased, and pandering. And I feel similarly about ex-Pres. Obama's politics. But I wouldn't post with glee if either one died.
I try to save that shit for truly evil people. Example: if Roman Polanski, child rapist, dies a horrible death, I might celebrate a little bit. Or Fidel, I might celebrate a lot. Assad, a lot. But, Huffington? Or some other leftist commentator?
*****
As for Ailes and journalism - I think a lot of people conflate Fox reporting with Fox commentary. Brett Baier, Shepard Smith, and Greta VanSusteren (when she was still there) were reporters and I think they were as fair as the best in the mainstream media.
I think you guys really hate Fox commentators like O'Reilly (now gone), Hannity, and Tucker Carlson. Along with Rush Limbaugh on talk radio, they emphasized stories and gave voice to viewpoints that unseated the mainstream media as the sole voice of the American public. The oligopoly is permanently destroyed and Ailes played a large role in that.
How dare he?
your basic tyrant: harrassment, intimidation, spying, co-erced sex.johno wrote:So he drugged & raped women? Was that the accusation?nafod wrote:Sexual harassment and assault. He was one creepy Bill Cosby-level dude.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
Didn't drug, but he was uniquely creepy in how he abused his position of authority.johno wrote:So he drugged & raped women? Was that the accusation?nafod wrote:Sexual harassment and assault. He was one creepy Bill Cosby-level dude.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
Sorry to interrupt your left-handed Circle Jerk of Smugness with a little perspective.buckethead wrote:Frankly, what seems disingenuous is Johno being Mr Sensitive on Irongarm
He definitely abused his position of authority, but he didn't invent the casting couch.nafod wrote:Didn't drug, but he was uniquely creepy in how he abused his position of authority.johno wrote:So he drugged & raped women? Was that the accusation?nafod wrote:Sexual harassment and assault. He was one creepy Bill Cosby-level dude.johno wrote:Such hate. I wonder about you guys.
Do you hate Ailes because he created Fox or because he sexually harassed some of his employees? Or...?
Perspective has never been your calling card. Why now?.johno wrote:Sorry to interrupt your left-handed Circle Jerk of Smugness with a little perspective.buckethead wrote:Frankly, what seems disingenuous is Johno being Mr Sensitive on Irongarm
I'm not defending him, just pointing out that this a ridiculously common form of scumbaggery.dead man walking wrote:johno's signature is yeats. for this thread, he may be invoking donne: "no man is an island."
he's employing paradox, using an anti-fox news tactic to get us to examine our attitudes toward the fox news asshole in chief.
i can respect that.
it's better than turd's defense: "but your honor, lots of vandals have looted and pillaged before i ever did."
is perdition the fate of said scumbags?Turdacious wrote:I'm not defending him, just pointing out that this a ridiculously common form of scumbaggery.dead man walking wrote:johno's signature is yeats. for this thread, he may be invoking donne: "no man is an island."
he's employing paradox, using an anti-fox news tactic to get us to examine our attitudes toward the fox news asshole in chief.
i can respect that.
it's better than turd's defense: "but your honor, lots of vandals have looted and pillaged before i ever did."
He's finding out right now.dead man walking wrote:is perdition the fate of said scumbags?Turdacious wrote:I'm not defending him, just pointing out that this a ridiculously common form of scumbaggery.dead man walking wrote:johno's signature is yeats. for this thread, he may be invoking donne: "no man is an island."
he's employing paradox, using an anti-fox news tactic to get us to examine our attitudes toward the fox news asshole in chief.
i can respect that.
it's better than turd's defense: "but your honor, lots of vandals have looted and pillaged before i ever did."