covid vax injuries

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

Topic author
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 396
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:13 am

covid vax injuries

Post by lenny »

I have a lot of information. I don't have time to edit this but I will put it up anyhow. You can believe it or not. I don't get any money from any of this.I think there's a lot of truth in this. Nobody is correct all the time. ... t-pandemic ... medium=web

There is less than an 8 minute video with Steve Gruber and Dr McCullough
that I found astounding.

Here are the relevant details from the post by Dr. McCullough

How to Get Ready for the Next Pandemic
Dr. McCullough on the Steve Gruber Show
NOV 14, 2023

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

"Prominent players in the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex including Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director of the WHO, Bill Gates, Dr. Peter Hotez, and former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, MD, all have publicly stated that there will be another pandemic and when it comes, it is going to make the COVID-19 crisis look like a warm-up. All of them look lathered when making this predictions because they are in the vaccine business. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) is an alliance to finance and coordinate the development of new vaccines to prevent and contain infectious disease epidemics. In other words, to these people pandemics are vaccine business opportunities. Vaccines have never been a solution for a highly prevalent infectious disease pandemic.

You'll have to click the link but the head of the WHO has urged everyone to prepare themselves for an even deadlier pandemic.

This is Dr McCullough's words
I had a chance on the Steve Gruber show to make the case that the next pandemic is very likely going to be another highly infectious respiratory virus coming out of a biosecurity laboratory as product of improperly monitored and contained gain-of-function research. Remember the May 19, 2021 NIH Statement on gain-of-function.

“National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) have for many years supported grants to learn more about viruses lurking in bats and other mammals that have the potential to spill over to humans and cause widespread disease. However, neither NIH nor NIAID have ever approved any grant that would have supported “gain-of-function” research on coronaviruses that would have increased their transmissibility or lethality for humans.”

There is no ban on gain of function research supported by entities other than the NIH and the research itself is not illegal. Thus, the next pandemic is likely to be similar to COVID-19 and may have other secondary risks including bacterial infections."

If you go on wikipedia which I did a few months ago, McCullough is portrayed as a dangerous fraud. You'd have to go on the Tor Browser to get some real information. Glenn Greenwald had an interview with one of the former founders of wikipedia
some time ago who said that wikipedia is completely censored. In my not too humble opinion, freedom in the land of the free and home of the brave is
going down the drain quite quickly.

The Real Plague of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex
Dr. McCullough Interviewed by Ameena Ahmed on Free Thinkers Hub

DEC 22, 2023




By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
Please enjoy this audio interview on Free Thinkers Hub hosted by Ameena Ahmed. We cover why lipid-nanoparticles laced with synthetic mRNA is the worst-conceived biological product in the history of mankind. To make matters worse, the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex as dozens more similar vaccines on the way (influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, etc.). It is predictable that the onslaught of ill-advised and medical dangerous vaccination will be the global “real plague” in the years to come. ... /a-aalk5sp


. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49204. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Clinical Approach to Post-acute Sequelae After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination
Nicolas Hulscher 1, Brian C Procter 2, Cade Wynn 2, Peter A McCullough 3 4
Affiliations expand
PMID: 38024037 PMCID: PMC10663976 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49204
Free PMC article
The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been found to exhibit pathogenic characteristics and be a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines utilize a modified, stabilized prefusion spike protein that may share similar toxic effects with its viral counterpart. The aim of this study is to investigate possible mechanisms of harm to biological systems from SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and vaccine-encoded spike protein and to propose possible mitigation strategies. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and 'grey literature' to find studies that (1) investigated the effects of the spike protein on biological systems, (2) helped differentiate between viral and vaccine-generated spike proteins, and (3) identified possible spike protein detoxification protocols and compounds that had signals of benefit and acceptable safety profiles. We found abundant evidence that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may cause damage in the cardiovascular, hematological, neurological, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and immunological systems. Viral and vaccine-encoded spike proteins have been shown to play a direct role in cardiovascular and thrombotic injuries from both SARS-CoV-2 and vaccination. Detection of spike protein for at least 6-15 months after vaccination and infection in those with post-acute sequelae indicates spike protein as a possible primary contributing factor to long COVID. We rationalized that these findings give support to the potential benefit of spike protein detoxification protocols in those with long-term post-infection and/or vaccine-induced complications. We propose a base spike detoxification protocol, composed of oral nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin. This approach holds immense promise as a base of clinical care, upon which additional therapeutic agents are applied with the goal of aiding in the resolution of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination. Large-scale, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are warranted in order to determine the relative risks and benefits of the base spike detoxification protocol.
Keywords: covid-19 treatment; covid-19 vaccines; long covid; medicine; post-acute sequelae; sars-cov-2; sars-cov-2 spike protein; spike glycoprotein; spike protein detoxification; treatment protocol.
Copyright © 2023, Hulscher et al.
PubMed Disclaimer
Conflict of interest statement
PM receives partial salary support and holds an equity position in The Wellness Company, Boca Raton, Florida, which had no role in this study.

An update on COVID-19: SARS-CoV-2 variants, antiviral drugs, and vaccines. Hillary VE, Ceasar SA. Heliyon. 2023;9:0. - PMC - PubMed
WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. [ Nov; 2023 ]. 2023.
A comprehensive review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: Pfizer, Moderna & Johnson & Johnson. Patel R, Kaki M, Potluri VS, Kahar P, Khanna D. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18:2002083. - PMC - PubMed
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: pathogenesis, vaccines, and potential therapies. Almehdi AM, Khoder G, Alchakee AS, Alsayyid AT, Sarg NH, Soliman SS. Infection. 2021;49:855–876. - PMC - PubMed
Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, Topol EJ. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21:133–146. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 82 references
Publication types

Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Europe PubMed Central
PubMed Central
NCI CPTAC Assay Portal ... d&r=21qoj6
Please enjoy - to the extent you can - my Foreword to ‘The Indoctrinated Brain’, by Dr Michael Nehls. The book, which explains the neuroscience of propaganda, will chill your soul, but may explain a great deal.

‘The fact that the brain is plastic—modifiable—has become much better understood by the public in the past few decades.

General readers understand by now that the human brain can be altered; and that experiences can modify its reactions and processes. We understand now for example that PTSD leaves lasting changes in brain functioning. It’s been established that motherhood changes the brain and that bonding itself is a chemical process modified by the brain.

We also understand, as general readers, that propaganda is real. Some of us have studied propaganda in the past. We have a working knowledge of Joseph Goebbels, and of the artistry and craft that underlay his manufacturing of National Socialist consent. The work of Edward Bernays, one of the earliest practitioners of what became the field of public relations, has been widely read in English. Decades-old bestsellers such as Subliminal Seduction by Wilson Bryan Key exposed the fact that advertisers use every tool at their disposal to alter our reactions to their products—down to the level of the subconscious mind.

Modern general audiences also understand that governments use “messaging”—and often, heavy-handed propaganda—to lead us to take actions that can be against our interests or our better conscious judgments; to create prejudices and divisions that may not otherwise exist; to heighten fears and to trigger a sense of vulnerability in us, so that we can be better manipulated and guided to goals that are not our own.

But Dr. Michael Nehls’s thesis in this book is revolutionary because it brings together all of these fields of inquiry and proposes a set of questions so radical that they make the mysteries of the past three years fall into place. This is the indispensable book. In The Indoctrinated Brain, Dr. Nehls brings these areas of study together in a way that has never been done before. By applying neuroscience to the otherwise bizarre

events of the recent past, he explains what has happened to humanity.

Many of us have noted that our loved ones and colleagues have changed. Post- mRNA injection rollout, we notice that people who were highly educated critical thinkers, have become unable to think outside of two simple binaries. We watch in astonishment as formerly sophisticated loved ones and friends regurgitate talking points with no self-awareness. We wonder why there is a sense of something inchoately missing when we sit with a vaccinated or COVID-fearful friend. We cannot fathom what has caused this sea change.

Dr. Nehls’s hypothesis can explain it. “The Indoctrinated Brain introduces a largely unknown, powerful neurobiological mechanism whose externally induced dysfunction underlies these catastrophic developments,” as the publisher notes.

Dr. Nehls argues that the spike protein, along with other COVID measures, represents an intentional attack on the human hippocampus—where autobiographical memory and individuality itself originate—and that “fear porn” keeps us from holding on to the autobiographical memories that encompass our former selves. As a result, humans have become deindividualized, more suggestible, more forgetful, more compliant, and less able to engage in critical thinking and creative reasoning. This argument utterly accords with what many of us are seeing, to our horror, every day. Dr. Nehls’s The Indoctrinated Brain is an indispensable book because it applies neuroscience to politics and especially to the politics of fascism. The need for that has existed for as long as modern fascism has existed.

Neuroscience should be applied to politics and to social change, but it is rare indeed when those fields of analysis meet. By bringing these fields of knowledge together and mapping neurological science against propaganda, and vice versa, Dr. Nehls brings vast new insights to the reader that would not have been attainable previously.

After you read The Indoctrinated Brain, you will think: Of course. Of course, the propaganda of the past few years must have been predicated upon intensive study of the brain and its reactions. Of course, the hundreds of millions of dollars that were recently spent and are currently being spent by the US and other governments on behavioral science and behavior modification would result in insights that would be applied by the US and other governments to making populations more tractable, less able to reason, less creative and more compliant. Why else would they so heavily have invested in such studies? Of course, the constant messaging, especially about fear, over the past three years, would have an effect that is not just about public health or perhaps not at all about public health—but that it is rather about making humans in free societies more tractable—with public health as the excuse, the proxy, for this deployment of life-altering and consciousness-altering fear. It is not the fear porn about the specific scary thing that matters, Dr. Nehls persuasively argues here: the fear itself is deliverable. The fear itself changes and indeed damages the brain.

I’ve long been interested in the psychiatric effects and, as I guessed, intentionalities behind “lockdowns” and “pandemic” messaging. But I did not have the neuroscientific background to understand exactly what was being done to people via “lockdowns” and the “fear porn” of the pandemic years related to the virus—to other human beings.

Through my study of the psychiatric effects of torture and isolation, that I took on for a book about closing democracies, I realized that isolation causes profound and sometimes permanent changes in the brain. I knew intuitively in the post-9/11, “Global War on Terror” years, that constant fear would wear down faculties needed for critical thinking. And I applied those insights to the isolation and fear messaging of 2020–22. But I did not have the complete picture.

This book provides it. It is the “aha” hypothetical for our time.

The Indoctrinated Brain provides the missing practical knowledge of neuroscience, that explains why isolating people creates a more befuddled, more easily manipulated population. It explains exactly why a message that closeness with other human beings can kill you, or you can kill others (especially your grandma) through physical closeness, might rewire the human brain to create the vulnerability to delusion and bad science and cultlike thinking, that many of us observed in formerly critically thinking loved ones and friends, post-2020. It even raises the question of whether the spike protein contributes to brain fog and to the erasure of a sense of an autonomous, resilient, individuated, and questing self.

If Dr. Nehls is right, his theory here will be as important as Dr. Sigmund Freud’s discovery of the subconscious, if not more so. If he is right, his theory explains why governments around the world mandated “lockdown” measures and mRNA injections, which would not ultimately then be about public health but about creating manipulable, passive citizens. If Dr. Nehls is right, it explains so many baffling features of the past three years—notably the fact that formerly thoughtful, highly individuated leaders of institutions, down to rank-and-file citizens, followed cultlike dicta without a mur- mur, and pursued nonsensical goals such as isolation, masking, and submission to vaccine mandates, without protest. Dr. Nehls’s thesis would explain the bizarre experience many of us are having of watching our formerly analytical loved ones, find themselves unable to keep two thoughts in their heads at the same time, unable to engage in calm debate without exploding emotionally, unable to maintain contact and connection with people with whom they disagree.

As I write, another global crisis is being spun up, this one in the Middle East. Within a day, highly educated and formerly skeptical loved ones of mine are repeating glaring legacy media talking points without any self-consciousness. It’s upsetting not to know why they would change in this way—and it is even more upsetting, though incredibly enlightening, to read Dr. Nehls’s argument and realize what the cause may be of their submissiveness to propaganda narratives. It makes it both easier and harder to contend with loved ones, friends, and colleagues who have been intellectually blunted in this way, to understand Dr. Nehls’s point of view and realize that this sad change in cognition might be simply physical—the spike protein—and neuropsychiatric: the repetition of fear messages and their impact on the brain.

In my social media feed today—on a day when the news has brought images of endless atrocities to our media streams, and when we are being told that this Friday will be a “Day of Jihad” with plenty of stabbings—someone wrote, “Protect your amygdala.” That meant, do not expose yourself to endless scenes of rape, murder, beheadings, atrocities, and horrors.

Dr. Nehls’s book is ultimately a hopeful one, since if we understand the damage to our brains from both spike proteins and fear pornography, we can find ways to prospect ourselves and our conscious minds. I appreciate the practical suggestions Dr. Nehls gives us to do just that.

It is scary that we are living in a time in which there is, as Dr. Nehls so powerfully points out, a war on our brains. But it must be less scary to understand what is being done to us, with Dr. Nehls’s help, so we can protect and strengthen our autobiographical memory and critical thinking, and so we can survive this onslaught with the full range of our intelligence—and our humanity—intact.‘

To support my work, and read the latest, please order and honestly review my new book Facing the Beast: Courage, Faith and Resistance in a New Dark Age: