Page 1 of 1

I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:56 pm
by TerryB
Everyone likes a good, PED-free Olympics.

Image

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:05 pm
by Boris
Proto,
Not too hard to find, but context is nice: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... d-off.html

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:48 am
by Protobuilder
protobuilder wrote:Everyone likes a good, PED-free Olympics.

Image
What search terms did you use to "happen" to find that?

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:05 am
by Testiclaw
Seriously. For a dude that doesn't click links, how the fuck did you end up pointing your browser to two male athletes showing off their unmentionables and quad development?

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:11 am
by Fat Cat
Image

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:18 am
by Protobuilder
Testiclaw wrote:Seriously. For a dude that doesn't click links, how the fuck did you end up pointing your browser to two male athletes showing off their unmentionables and quad development?
Google "olympic+underwear+men+muscles" and it comes back high in the image search, I imagine. Either that or Procto reads the Daily Mail and clicks links.

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:18 am
by Protobuilder
Terry B. wrote:Google "olympic+underwear+men+muscles" and it comes back high in the image search, I imagine.
:bona!

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:56 am
by Boris
Terry B. wrote:
protobuilder wrote:Everyone likes a good, PED-free Olympics.

Image
What search terms did you use to "happen" to find that?
I think I used: legs cyclists olympics

Fwiw, pretty common for sprint cyclists to take pics like that. No different than BBing.

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:54 am
by kreator
Is it just me or does the guy on the left have different sized legs? As in his left leg (our right) is much smaller.
I could see why that would be for a weightlifter, maybe javelin thrower or shotputter, but why for a cyclist?

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:04 am
by Protobuilder
Boris wrote:Fwiw, pretty common for sprint cyclists to take pics like that. No different than BBing.
You ended up on the Daily Mail.

Proto took that from the Daily Male or Scallywag and Somethingortheother.

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:56 am
by TerryB
See Terry? It's pretty common. Nothing unusual about my browsing patterns.

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:59 pm
by WildGorillaMan
The only group dumber than the Daily Mail's readers are its editorial staff. Talk about a room full of monkeys with typewriters.

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:16 am
by Blaidd Drwg
Boris wrote:
Terry B. wrote:
protobuilder wrote:Everyone likes a good, PED-free Olympics.

Image
What search terms did you use to "happen" to find that?
I think I used: legs cyclists olympics

Fwiw, pretty common for sprint cyclists to take pics like that. No different than BBing.
mitigated by the fact, they are some of the only people who can legitimately use the term quad dominant.

Re: I'm glad this year's Games aren't filled with drug pigs

Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:50 am
by sanchezero
i thought those were pics of @fit girls.