Page 1 of 2
Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:58 am
by DrDonkeyLove
Washington Post
“I will speak until I can no longer speak,” Paul said. “I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:46 am
by Herv100
Pfft. Not near as important as gays being able to get married and such.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:46 am
by baffled
DrDonkeyLove wrote:Washington Post
“I will speak until I can no longer speak,” Paul said. “I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”
Was watching it earlier. It was actually interesting.
Saw Mike Lee questioning Holder and thought he did well, too.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:15 am
by Protobuilder
Visited the CNN homepage to see what attention they are giving to it. They are leading with how terrible the Syrian gov't is to be killing their own citizens, followed by news of a lion attacking a worker in a wildlife park and then something about Facebook thinking of changing things about their news feed.
Ron Wyden (D-OR) has helped out and the ACLU has said they support it - this kind of thing needs to be supported across all kinds of party lines.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:21 am
by baffled
Terry B. wrote:Visited the CNN homepage to see what attention they are giving to it. They are leading with how terrible the Syrian gov't is to be killing their own citizens, followed by news of a lion attacking a worker in a wildlife park and then something about Facebook thinking of changing things about their news feed.
Ron Wyden (D-OR) has helped out and the ACLU has said they support it - this kind of thing needs to be supported across all kinds of party lines.
Wyden is one of the good dems on these issues.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:47 am
by baffled
I think he went 12 hours and 52 minutes. Should have hooked up a stadium pal. Old Strom pissed in a bucket or something during his 24+ filibuster, didn't he?
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:26 am
by Protobuilder
Want to know what "engaged in combat" means?
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:20 pm
by Pinky
Rand Paul is the best person in the Senate.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:04 pm
by Andy83
Pinky wrote:Rand Paul is the best person in the Senate.
But he's a Libertarian and doesn't really fit in there.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:10 pm
by Turdacious
LOL at this-- the posters here who go apeshit over every instance of police brutality they can find don't really give a shit when a politician actually tries to get a clear definition of acceptable domestic use of force (something that, FWIW, Holder's response really didn't define).
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:15 pm
by buckethead
Turdacious wrote:LOL at this-- the posters here who go apeshit over every instance of police brutality they can find don't really give a shit when a politician actually makes a point of trying to get a clear definition of acceptable domestic use of force (something that, FWIW, Holder's response really didn't define).
Huh? Isn't everyone on this thread supporting Rand? Why are your panties in a bunch?
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:18 pm
by Turdacious
BucketHead wrote:Turdacious wrote:LOL at this-- the posters here who go apeshit over every instance of police brutality they can find don't really give a shit when a politician actually makes a point of trying to get a clear definition of acceptable domestic use of force (something that, FWIW, Holder's response really didn't define).
Huh? Isn't everyone on this thread supporting Rand? Why are your panties in a bunch?
The response from the 'fuck the police' crowd has been pretty meh.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:24 pm
by Herv100
Turdacious wrote:LOL at this-- the posters here who go apeshit over every instance of police brutality they can find don't really give a shit when a politician actually tries to get a clear definition of acceptable domestic use of force (something that, FWIW, Holder's response really didn't define).
Indeed, Holder's response was vague horseshit.
Oh, and fuck the police!
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:32 pm
by Turdacious
That's one. Apparently all the others are in their dorm rooms, staring at their Ron Paul posters, masturbating while wearing Guy Fawkes masks.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:41 pm
by Pinky
Andy79 wrote:Pinky wrote:Rand Paul is the best person in the Senate.
But he's a Libertarian and doesn't really fit in there.
He doesn't fit in because he's better than they are.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:49 pm
by baffled
Turdacious wrote:That's one. Apparently all the others are in their dorm rooms, staring at their Ron Paul posters, masturbating while wearing Guy Fawkes masks.
Hey asshole. I'm active on both of these threads.
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiX7GTelTPM[/youtube]
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:54 pm
by Blaidd Drwg
Turdacious wrote:LOL at this-- the posters here who go apeshit over every instance of police brutality they can find don't really give a shit when a politician actually tries to get a clear definition of acceptable domestic use of force (something that, FWIW, Holder's response really didn't define).
To whom are you speaking? I think Rand is doing the lords work. Holder's dodge was well played..but a dodge nonetheless.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:57 pm
by Turdacious
baffled wrote:Turdacious wrote:That's one. Apparently all the others are in their dorm rooms, staring at their Ron Paul posters, masturbating while wearing Guy Fawkes masks.
Hey asshole. I'm active on both of these threads.
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiX7GTelTPM[/youtube]
Calm down spanky.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:02 pm
by Blaidd Drwg
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:28 pm
by Turdacious
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Turdacious wrote:LOL at this-- the posters here who go apeshit over every instance of police brutality they can find don't really give a shit when a politician actually tries to get a clear definition of acceptable domestic use of force (something that, FWIW, Holder's response really didn't define).
To whom are you speaking? I think Rand is doing the lords work. Holder's dodge was well played..but a dodge nonetheless.
You've been mighty quiet until now. And I disagree about Holder's dodge-- if Rand really understands political theater, he will use Holder's lack of precision to good effect. Why DHS needs MRAPs, especially given the timing of the contract being awarded, would seem to be a related question.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:36 pm
by Blaidd Drwg
Turdacious wrote:Blaidd Drwg wrote:Turdacious wrote:LOL at this-- the posters here who go apeshit over every instance of police brutality they can find don't really give a shit when a politician actually tries to get a clear definition of acceptable domestic use of force (something that, FWIW, Holder's response really didn't define).
To whom are you speaking? I think Rand is doing the lords work. Holder's dodge was well played..but a dodge nonetheless.
You've been mighty quiet until now. And I disagree about Holder's dodge-- if Rand really understands political theater, he will use Holder's lack of precision to good effect. Why DHS needs MRAPs, especially given the timing of the contract being awarded, would seem to be a related question.
This is the first complaint of my posting too little.
Holder's memo was not directed at Rand Paul even though it was addressed to him, he's already fairly marginalized. It was directed at Obama's sycophantical base.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:42 pm
by Turdacious
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Holder's memo was not directed at Rand Paul even though it was addressed to him, he's already fairly marginalized.
Rand is pretty photogenic, speaks well, and hasn't pissed off religious conservatives-- he's a rising star whether the old guard likes it or not. He's the first libertarian since Goldwater to get any real traction with adult voters.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:48 pm
by Blaidd Drwg
He also rubs a lot of people the wrong way. I think he's doing a great job but I don't hold out a tremdous amount of hope. At the end of the day I'd take just a handful of moderate or even old guard folks to stand up and say..what the actual fuck?
McCain was right to question torture, even if he's become a useless scab otherwise. For this to continue getting traction, we need another one of those...or heaven forbid, a democrat actual question their glorious leader.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:51 pm
by Blaidd Drwg
WWFFD.
What would fuckin France do?
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/08/world ... ?hpt=hp_t3
(CNN) -- A Frenchman was captured among jihadists fighting international forces in northern Mali and is being extradited to France, the French defense minister said Friday.
French forces are dealing with "determined terrorists" in Mali, said Defense Minister Jean Yves Le Drian, speaking to French radio station Europe 1 from the African nation's capital, Bamako.
Re: Isn't he dreamy?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:01 pm
by baffled
Blaidd Drwg wrote:He also rubs a lot of people the wrong way. I think he's doing a great job but I don't hold out a tremdous amount of hope. At the end of the day I'd take just a handful of moderate or even old guard folks to stand up and say..what the actual fuck?
McCain was right to question torture, even if he's become a useless scab otherwise. For this to continue getting traction, we need another one of those...or heaven forbid, a democrat actual question their glorious leader.
Ron Wyden's lacking the national exposure and clout, but he's the only dem who went out in support of Paul the other day. He's pretty good on civil liberties from what I can tell.
Guys like Cruz, Lee... Amash may have an opportunity at a senate seat now that Levin's not running for re-election. 2016 may be a little too early, but something pretty awesome could be brewing.
Probably not, but I hold out hope.