Shop your veterinary services
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 4:57 pm
Others may know this but it was a surprise to me.
About 18 months ago my dog got glaucoma in one eye, leaving it blind. They recommend an anti-glaucoma med for the other eye, since it often follows a second eye within a couple years. Eye-drops from vet or Walgreen's, $70. From CostCo, $15 dollars. Same med.
So, when she got lethargic and the fancy-pants vet we were referred to with an ultrasound machine found a mass on her spleen causing internal bleeding, we were told we were looking at $3500-$4000 to remove it, it needed to be done immediately since it could hemorrhage, and it wouldn't necessarily fix her. 2/3rds of the time the mass is malignant, and the dog dies from cancer within 3-6 months. 1/3rd of the time the dog is just fine afterwards.
Since her life expectancy is 4.5 more years, and my EV is 1/3 of that, I'm not paying $4,000 for 18 months of dog. Love my dog, but not doing that. But then I realize we've been transferred to a fancy pants emergency facility in the north suburbs. Perhaps there are other vets that don't charge as much.
I take the dog home that night and make a few calls the next morning that are further away. First vet will do it for $1200 - $1800. Second for $560. Of course, I'll have to drive an hour to Fox Lake instead of a half hour, but my time is worth less than $1,000/hr.
I've heard that the reason vets have gotten so expensive relative to 20 years ago is that consultants came in and basically said, "People love their dogs. Make this place look more like a doctor's office and charge way more." I've known a few people who (stupidly, in my view) spent several thousand dollars using a nearby vet to try to save their pet. Despite that, some places are still doing things the old way, particularly in markets that serve horses and other animals where owners are far less likely to be overly sentimental.
In any event, it's definitely worth shopping around for anything that gets beyond a couple hundred bucks. I hoped to find this for under half the cost, but had no idea there was 80%+ potential savings in cost.
About 18 months ago my dog got glaucoma in one eye, leaving it blind. They recommend an anti-glaucoma med for the other eye, since it often follows a second eye within a couple years. Eye-drops from vet or Walgreen's, $70. From CostCo, $15 dollars. Same med.
So, when she got lethargic and the fancy-pants vet we were referred to with an ultrasound machine found a mass on her spleen causing internal bleeding, we were told we were looking at $3500-$4000 to remove it, it needed to be done immediately since it could hemorrhage, and it wouldn't necessarily fix her. 2/3rds of the time the mass is malignant, and the dog dies from cancer within 3-6 months. 1/3rd of the time the dog is just fine afterwards.
Since her life expectancy is 4.5 more years, and my EV is 1/3 of that, I'm not paying $4,000 for 18 months of dog. Love my dog, but not doing that. But then I realize we've been transferred to a fancy pants emergency facility in the north suburbs. Perhaps there are other vets that don't charge as much.
I take the dog home that night and make a few calls the next morning that are further away. First vet will do it for $1200 - $1800. Second for $560. Of course, I'll have to drive an hour to Fox Lake instead of a half hour, but my time is worth less than $1,000/hr.
I've heard that the reason vets have gotten so expensive relative to 20 years ago is that consultants came in and basically said, "People love their dogs. Make this place look more like a doctor's office and charge way more." I've known a few people who (stupidly, in my view) spent several thousand dollars using a nearby vet to try to save their pet. Despite that, some places are still doing things the old way, particularly in markets that serve horses and other animals where owners are far less likely to be overly sentimental.
In any event, it's definitely worth shopping around for anything that gets beyond a couple hundred bucks. I hoped to find this for under half the cost, but had no idea there was 80%+ potential savings in cost.