IGX

Foundation With Biden Campaign Ties Funding Leftist Agitators On U.S. Streets
While activists Ford funds desecrate cities and terrorize regular folks, the foundation gives millions to the ‘Defund the Police’ movement.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/31/fo ... s-streets/

This is an interesting article on how one of the nation’s wealthiest foundations has interlocking directorates with Biden staff and Harris family members, funding violent extremists support ops.

You wonder why some people might be pissed off at the police in Kenosha. I hadn't seen this before.



Warehouse blacks until they die, then repurpose the building for Amazon. The sheriff said this. Nice.

nafod wrote: ↑Mon Aug 31, 2020 8:10 pm You wonder why some people might be pissed off at the police in Kenosha. I hadn't seen this before.



Warehouse blacks until they die, then repurpose the building for Amazon. The sheriff said this. Nice.

That has nothing to do with the article that was posted. I agree that that Sheriff sounds like a dent-head. I really can't understand why adults use non-anonymous social media.

The best book I've seen on the Rise of the Foundations is E Michael Jones' The Slaughter of Cities.

Fair warning it is a god damned tome.

But it is just incredible.

Don't tease us like that, give us a paragraph or two. What's it about?

motherjuggs&speed wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:34 am Don't tease us like that, give us a paragraph or two. What's it about?

Big picture is that the Atlantic Seaboard WASPs (the only real WASPs: Yankees, Quakers and Cavalier families) came home from WWII and took over the Fed Gov. Created the Deep State. This included seeding ppl into the Foundations.

They then turned their focus on breaking the power of the Urban Catholic parishes which they saw as the largest threat.

They allied with the East Coast Ashkenazi Jews (the Jews in the South and the old line Jews in Midwest hated them for this) as well.

It was very similar to today: the Intel Community and the Foundations co-opted the media.

And the Quakers were instrumental in "block breaking" which meant searching high and low for a black family that was willing to move into a Catholic neighborhood which then caused white flight.

The parallel to today is that the "Deep State" has a new enemy which is the same one mostly: recalcitrant middle american whites.

You can see this tactic discussed here in this cool post:

One approach might be to argue that relatively well-off and highly-educated liberal whites — by virtue of their college education and higher rates of consumption of ‘woke’ content in the media, online, etc. — simply understand the reality and dynamics of racism better than the average black or Hispanic. I would strongly advise against anyone taking a stand on that hill.

What is more plausible is that many whites, in their eagerness to present themselves as advocates for people of color and the cause of antiracism, neglect to actually listen to ordinary black or brown folk about what they find offensive, or what their racial priorities are.

White elites —who play an outsized role in defining racism in academia, the media, and the broader culture — instead seem to define ‘racism’ in ways that are congenial to their own preferences and priorities. Rather than actually dismantling white supremacy or meaningfully empowering people of color, efforts often seem to be oriented towards consolidating social and cultural capital in the hands of the ‘good’ whites. Charges of “racism,” for instance, are primarily deployed against the political opponents of upwardly-mobile, highly-educated progressive white people. Even to the point of branding prominent black or brown dissenters as race-traitors (despite the reality that, on average, blacks and Hispanics tend to be significantly more socially conservative and religious than whites).

The politicized nature of these accusations is not lost on their intended targets. The blowback against a perceived overuse of “racism” charges seems to have significantly contributed to the rise of Donald Trump and other demagogic figures in the U.S. and Western Europe. It is primarily marginalized and vulnerable populations who tend to suffer when such figures come into power (upwardly mobile highly-educated whites, regardless of their political leanings, are still doing just fine). Indeed, evidence is growing that many fashionable formulations of “racism” (and antiracist activism) may be directly pernicious for people of color.

https://contexts.org/blog/who-gets-to-d ... ts-racist/

That is how the elite or Deep State operate. They use the minorities as pawns to attack the real enemy. In this case the white Elite (or their fanbois like nafod and spells who dream of being Elite but are just losers to any real Elite) are seeking to break the power of bad whites by means of social justice etc etc etc.

That's why I call it intra-ethnic cleansing. The only bloc capable of opposing the Elite on either wages or std of living or For Pol are middle american Whites. That's why they hate them so much.

I grudgingly respect our elites foresight in knowing which systems to co-opt to achieve their desired ends. Even though the elite Lucifer despises the lessers, he deserves his due.

Our elites increasingly warm embrace of Critical Race Theory is germane to the actions of the Ford Foundation. This article is long and only for those interested in the CRT rabbit hole so I won't bother with quotes.

Turdacious wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:37 am

You're a worthless poster. Uninteresting and lazy and tedius and unfunny. You make this site worse with every post.

If I ran this site I would ban you.

You have never once typed anything I have found interesting or seemed to advance the conversation or even be funny.

Bennyonesix1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 4:05 am

motherjuggs&speed wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:34 am Don't tease us like that, give us a paragraph or two. What's it about?

Big picture is that the Atlantic Seaboard WASPs (the only real WASPs: Yankees, Quakers and Cavalier families) came home from WWII and took over the Fed Gov. Created the Deep State. This included seeding ppl into the Foundations.

They then turned their focus on breaking the power of the Urban Catholic parishes which they saw as the largest threat.

They allied with the East Coast Ashkenazi Jews (the Jews in the South and the old line Jews in Midwest hated them for this) as well.

It was very similar to today: the Intel Community and the Foundations co-opted the media.

And the Quakers were instrumental in "block breaking" which meant searching high and low for a black family that was willing to move into a Catholic neighborhood which then caused white flight.

The parallel to today is that the "Deep State" has a new enemy which is the same one mostly: recalcitrant middle american whites.

You can see this tactic discussed here in this cool post:

One approach might be to argue that relatively well-off and highly-educated liberal whites — by virtue of their college education and higher rates of consumption of ‘woke’ content in the media, online, etc. — simply understand the reality and dynamics of racism better than the average black or Hispanic. I would strongly advise against anyone taking a stand on that hill.

What is more plausible is that many whites, in their eagerness to present themselves as advocates for people of color and the cause of antiracism, neglect to actually listen to ordinary black or brown folk about what they find offensive, or what their racial priorities are.

White elites —who play an outsized role in defining racism in academia, the media, and the broader culture — instead seem to define ‘racism’ in ways that are congenial to their own preferences and priorities. Rather than actually dismantling white supremacy or meaningfully empowering people of color, efforts often seem to be oriented towards consolidating social and cultural capital in the hands of the ‘good’ whites. Charges of “racism,” for instance, are primarily deployed against the political opponents of upwardly-mobile, highly-educated progressive white people. Even to the point of branding prominent black or brown dissenters as race-traitors (despite the reality that, on average, blacks and Hispanics tend to be significantly more socially conservative and religious than whites).

The politicized nature of these accusations is not lost on their intended targets. The blowback against a perceived overuse of “racism” charges seems to have significantly contributed to the rise of Donald Trump and other demagogic figures in the U.S. and Western Europe. It is primarily marginalized and vulnerable populations who tend to suffer when such figures come into power (upwardly mobile highly-educated whites, regardless of their political leanings, are still doing just fine). Indeed, evidence is growing that many fashionable formulations of “racism” (and antiracist activism) may be directly pernicious for people of color.

https://contexts.org/blog/who-gets-to-d ... ts-racist/

That is how the elite or Deep State operate. They use the minorities as pawns to attack the real enemy. In this case the white Elite (or their fanbois like nafod and spells who dream of being Elite but are just losers to any real Elite) are seeking to break the power of bad whites by means of social justice etc etc etc.

That's why I call it intra-ethnic cleansing. The only bloc capable of opposing the Elite on either wages or std of living or For Pol are middle american Whites. That's why they hate them so much.

Good post, although I cannot speak to the particulars of the genesis of the current Derp State, it's a fascinating question. Bureaucracies have an organizational mind and momentum all their own. It was in full display today on NPR with this story:

DS is really pushing the line that no, it's not the Antifa communist scum and the black dupes burning your cities that are the problem, right wing extremists are behind every tree because "muh white supremacy". It would be laughable if it wasn't so transparent and sick.

Good post, although I cannot speak to the particulars of the genesis of the current Derp State, it's a fascinating question. Bureaucracies have an organizational mind and momentum all their own. It was in full display today on NPR with this story:

DS is really pushing the line that no, it's not the Antifa communist scum and the black dupes burning your cities that are the problem, right wing extremists are behind every tree because "muh white supremacy". It would be laughable if it wasn't so transparent and sick.

Yeah. The term "deep state" isn't really useful. It's been defined so many different ways (over-definition) that using it makes understanding almost impossible. I try not to use it but I slip up because my own definition is so clear to me.

Ppl on the Right also try and capture the idea with "Communists!" And "Socialists!".

But the genesis of the Foundations really does lie in the capture of US Gov Institutions (Intel most powerful) by the returning elite Eastern Seaboard WASPs after WWII.

Their ethos (which is hard to define even for me as I am technically one +50%) is one of ethnic pride and dominance but it is so incredibly sublimated. No one else is capable of running things but "the wrong types" of whites make what is a simple thing (the smooth operation of society) almost impossible.

They truly believe that the only meaningful impediment is "white trash".

There's a huge disgust with over-breeders and ostentation with low quality items.

The aspect that transmits to non-white elites is the hatred of and desire to control "white trash".

It's amazing and hard to believe but every single thing the Elite push is no matter what it seems or how seemingly unrelated to intra-ethnic cleansing is in fact an undermining of the culture of "bad whites".

NOTE: today "bad whites" includes euro ethnic catholics as well as non-elite WASPs.

Agreed about the Derp State, I use it in a very tongue-in-cheek way but you're right, it's better left alone. The reality of the situation is that it represents the over-socialized, career bureaucrat class as a block, and their ability to control government at an unsupervised and anti-democratic level. They have subverted the press completely by peddling access and never saw a war or intervention they didn't like.

Fat Cat wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:19 pm Agreed about the Derp State, I use it in a very tongue-in-cheek way but you're right, it's better left alone. The reality of the situation is that it represents the over-socialized, career bureaucrat class as a block, and their ability to control government at an unsupervised and anti-democratic level. They have subverted the press completely by peddling access and never saw a war or intervention they didn't like.

Yeah. What we have now is a disparate group united by what seems to be ethnic animus towards middle american whites. and that group has taken over the Institutions. Both in numbers and in key positions.

In that sense, Trump represented a challenge to that control from a powerful faction, again middle american whites.

It doesn't look like Trump understood what was really going on or catastrophically underestimated their control and willingness to violate cultural norms to preserve that control. And I think he counted on the fgts at FOX to back him like a sucker.

Here at the end of his first term we see what I think is the beginning of a real counter-offensive. But it may be too little too late. Or he may be being played again.

That's why I worry about the House and the Senate races. Nixon tried the same thing Trump is doing and won a landslide in 1972 but his coalition didn't carry very many House or Senate seats and we saw what happened.

It's really similar today, the GOP pols are almost totally opposed to Trump. And we saw them throw the midterms in an attempt to outsource his removal or stymie him if we are being generous. I wouldn't put it past them to do it again.

Just look at how the GOP united to defeat Kris Kobach. If the GOP had any intention at all of being right-wing, Kobach would be their poster boy. But they don't. The bastards.

Trump also has distanced himself from Kobach. But that could be just his narcissism.

The difference between Nixon and Trump is that Trump has truly powerful backers: Bibi and a real US Intel faction behind him.

I think it is fair to say that Trump ran intending a house cleaning in DC. And the whole "build the wall" thing was a false front. Or something he believed in but number 13 on his list of priorities. 1-12 being other reforms of the economy and an isolationist For Pol.

Bennyonesix1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:04 pm The difference between Nixon and Trump is that Trump has truly powerful backers: Bibi and a real US Intel faction behind him.

You left off the Russians.

Nixon had to get his own countrymen to bust into the Dems, Trump had the Russians do it for him.

Jfc shut up you ignorant knee jerk media narrative moron

Fat Cat wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:19 pm Agreed about the Derp State, I use it in a very tongue-in-cheek way but you're right, it's better left alone. The reality of the situation is that it represents the over-socialized, career bureaucrat class as a block, and their ability to control government at an unsupervised and anti-democratic level. They have subverted the press completely by peddling access and never saw a war or intervention they didn't like.

Early on I held your "bureaucratic class" self-interest narrative. And I still do to some extent. But it doesn't explain the amount of risk these ppl are willing to expose themselves to. The opposition faction has person after person willing to wildly violate cultural norms. I don't think defense of sinecures or status explains that.

I get they are confident in the ability of their compatriots in the Institutions to protect them or reward them after punishment... but still... the things they've done are outrageous violations of cultural norms and as much as 10years ago would have meant total ostracism.

That makes me think there is something deeper going on, some actual ideological motivation. And which is why the "Communists!" And "Socialists!" memes are so appealing to the unconscious of so many on the Right.

Bennyonesix1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:09 pm Jfc shut up you ignorant knee jerk media narrative moron

You are Putin's useful idiot

Really appreciate your relentless efforts to make this place as dumb as facebook.

Man, the Russians are playing you and your conspiracy theory brothers for cheap skanks. They splatter all kinds of deep state bullshit out there for you to lap up and repeat, and you just keep blathering on and layering on even more stupidity. They don't even have to pay you, you do it for free.

They must LOLOLOL at morons like you, B16, carrying on their good work for them.

Get a hold of yourself man.

nafod wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:08 pm

Bennyonesix1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:04 pm The difference between Nixon and Trump is that Trump has truly powerful backers: Bibi and a real US Intel faction behind him.

You left off the Russians.

Nixon had to get his own countrymen to bust into the Dems, Trump had the Russians do it for him.

No, he really didn't.

And Watergate failed, while Russia-gate succeeded.

Is there a block function here? Because nafod's neurotic dull tourette's good think is unbearable.

Bennyonesix1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:16 pm

Fat Cat wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:19 pm Agreed about the Derp State, I use it in a very tongue-in-cheek way but you're right, it's better left alone. The reality of the situation is that it represents the over-socialized, career bureaucrat class as a block, and their ability to control government at an unsupervised and anti-democratic level. They have subverted the press completely by peddling access and never saw a war or intervention they didn't like.

Early on I held your "bureaucratic class" self-interest narrative. And I still do to some extent. But it doesn't explain the amount of risk these ppl are willing to expose themselves to. The opposition faction has person after person willing to wildly violate cultural norms. I don't think defense of sinecures or status explains that.

I get they are confident in the ability of their compatriots in the Institutions to protect them or reward them after punishment... but still... the things they've done are outrageous violations of cultural norms and as much as 10years ago would have meant total ostracism.

That makes me think there is something deeper going on, some actual ideological motivation. And which is why the "Communists!" And "Socialists!" memes are so appealing to the unconscious of so many on the Right.

If one can apply inductive reasoning from the specific to the general, the ideological motivation is the destruction of the white majority in the United States and Europe.

If one can apply inductive reasoning from the specific to the general, the ideological motivation is the destruction of the white majority in the United States and Europe.

Yeah. I'd phrase it as the final destruction of the only demographic capable of obstructing the powers that be.