Page 1 of 2

ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:48 am
by Protobuilder
Free Irongarm points to any person who comes up with either Twiddle Dee or Twiddle Dumb.

http://www.isidewith.com/

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:42 am
by TerryB
I dont click links

and apparently, neither does anyone else

chin up, m8!

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:04 pm
by Gene
Do you mean Ron Paul and Gary Johnson Or are you talking about Obamney?

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:07 pm
by johno
Paul > Johnson > Romney > Obama

On Afghanistan, I elected to get out. (I didn't do a "None of the Above," write-your-own plan.) That, and my social libertarian bent, tipped things to the first two.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:07 pm
by baffled
The Rent Is Too Damn High!

Just Kidding.

Paul, then Johnson, Romney, no way on Brobama.

edit:
In all seriousness, somehow the Rent is Too Damn High chap came in before Obama.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:17 pm
by Protobuilder
protobuilder wrote:I dont click links

and apparently, neither does anyone else

chin up, m8!
It's a slow burn thread - this is going to be good for seven or eight pages.

I know what I'm doing.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:40 pm
by msr2112
Well, how about that. I got Barack. Ron Paul in last place.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:42 pm
by msr2112
I guess y'all are gonna hate me now.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:10 am
by KingSchmaltzBagelHour
I got Gary Johnson, with Obama and Romney at the bottom of the barrel.
Who the fuck is Gary Johnson?

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:12 am
by johno
Not your next President.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:58 am
by Protobuilder
msr2112 wrote:Well, how about that. I got Barack. Ron Paul in last place.
OK, my theory that nobody would actually get Obama or Romney is out the window.

Barack beat out Ron Paul for me - not sure how that happened.

I may vote Green Party, in line with my results.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:06 am
by Cave Canem
Johnson, Paul, Romney, that guy with the big ears.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:09 am
by Turdacious
Terry B. wrote:
msr2112 wrote:Well, how about that. I got Barack. Ron Paul in last place.
OK, my theory that nobody would actually get Obama or Romney is out the window.

Barack beat out Ron Paul for me - not sure how that happened.

I may vote Green Party, in line with my results.
Image

144,287!

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:15 am
by Protobuilder
Actually, it was Jill Stein, who I have never heard of though decided that I had better read a bit about.

She is legit, needing to beat Roseanne Barr (who had the support of McKinney) in the national primary.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:48 am
by Turdacious
I side with Kodos > Kang

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:40 am
by Yes, I'm drunk
Terry B. wrote:
protobuilder wrote:I dont click links

and apparently, neither does anyone else

chin up, m8!
It's a slow burn thread - this is going to be good for seven or eight pages.

I know what I'm doing.
=D>

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:21 pm
by Pinky
I do not side with Mitt Romney on any major issues.
Who knew?

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:46 pm
by Ryan
Terry B. wrote: OK, my theory that nobody would actually get Obama or Romney is out the window.
Mine:

Romney > Johnson > Paul > Obama

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:26 am
by Protobuilder
Ryan wrote:
Terry B. wrote: OK, my theory that nobody would actually get Obama or Romney is out the window.
Mine:

Romney > Johnson > Paul > Obama
STOP!

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:14 am
by Gene
Terry B. wrote:Barack beat out Ron Paul for me - not sure how that happened.
You're too idealistic for your own good?

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:56 am
by Protobuilder
Gene wrote:
Terry B. wrote:Barack beat out Ron Paul for me - not sure how that happened.
You're too idealistic for your own good?
Probably - some of the issues are "important" but that doesn't mean that I think the federal government should have their say in them - in fact, the opposite is true.

Paul has some ideas that are fairly far out there but, seeing what percentage of ideas and promises that Obama was able to get by Congress, what would result in a Paul presidency would probably be palatable for everybody who doesn't want their hand held throughout their lives.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:28 pm
by tough old man
Johnson, but I'm not suprised.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:44 pm
by dead man walking
gene mccarthy, ralph nader, george mcgovern, daniel noriega

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:47 pm
by Gene
dead man walking wrote:gene mccarthy, ralph nader, george mcgovern, daniel noriega
You mean "Daniel ORTEGA". Get the names of your Oppressive Statists STRAIGHT DMW!

Noriega is the US CIA asset who got too big for his britches. Arrested by the US Military and sent to jail. He'll die there of old age.

Ortega is the Cuban DGI asset who got too big for his britches. He exterminated thirty percent of the Mosquito Indian population while "relocating" them, flushed Nicaragua's economy down the toilet. Got kicked out on his ass by the CIA. Came back to power after being bankrolled by Hugo Chavez. Today he's stealing the San Juan River for a sea level canal, banning abortion and praying in Church while fucking up the Nicaraguan Economy - again.

McCarthy has been dead for years... since he's a Democrat he can vote so he might as well run for office too.

Re: ISideWith.com

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:55 pm
by Holland Oates
Image
I'm not all that surprised.