Page 1 of 1
Quantum Locking
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:05 pm
by buckethead
Holy fucking batman shit!
How can a super-thin, three-inch disk levitate something 70,000 times its own weight? In a riveting, futuristic demonstration, Boaz Almog shows how a phenomenon known as quantum locking allows a superconductor disk to float over a magnetic rail -- completely frictionlessly and with zero energy loss.
http://on.ted.com/Almog
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:32 pm
by Turdacious
Is this legit or a metaphor for your last Texas camping trip?
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:13 pm
by The Cunning Stunt
"Electricity is flow of electrons." False.
While a neat demonstration, what's the big deal?
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:28 pm
by Sassenach
Didn't click, when can I expect my hover-car?
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:31 pm
by Sua Sponte
ecalpal wrote:"Electricity is flow of electrons." False.
Explain.
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:52 pm
by buckethead
Sua Sponte wrote:ecalpal wrote:"Electricity is flow of electrons." False.
Explain.
He heard something cool in his GED class that completely trivialized this TED lecture
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:02 pm
by Sua Sponte
Just as I suspected.
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:27 am
by Testiclaw
I'd like to hear his explanation for that, too, if he's up for it, just out of curiosity.
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:15 am
by Schlegel
By definition, inside a conductor electrons are free to move, basically one per atom. In DC, electrons do flow, but not very fast. There is a combination of electron drift and exchange of energy between electrons but the energy speed outpaces the actual electron flow by many orders of magnitude. In AC, because the current is reversing very fast, the electrons don't flow, but vibrate back and forth in a small area.
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:03 pm
by Sua Sponte
Schlegel wrote:By definition, inside a conductor electrons are free to move, basically one per atom. In DC, electrons do flow, but not very fast. There is a combination of electron drift and exchange of energy between electrons but the energy speed outpaces the actual electron flow by many orders of magnitude. In AC, because the current is reversing very fast, the electrons don't flow, but vibrate back and forth in a small area.
Not completely right, but close enough for IGx purposes. The definition of a conductor isn't quite right. Nor is the electron count necessarily so. The electron velocity without impressed voltage is thermal, but the scattering events are there anyway. Under impressed voltage the scattering events are what keep the drift velocity low.
To the question of flow, if the electrons aren't flowing in AC, how is power delivered? BTW, the current need not be reversing very fast for the current to be AC. Any frequency will do just fine-that fact being a pointer to the answer to the question.
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:10 pm
by TerryB
Schlegel wrote:By definition, inside a conductor electrons are free to move, basically one per atom. In DC, electrons do flow, but not very fast. There is a combination of electron drift and exchange of energy between electrons but the energy speed outpaces the actual electron flow by many orders of magnitude. In AC, because the current is reversing very fast, the electrons don't flow, but vibrate back and forth in a small area.
oh shut up, Smegel
Re: Quantum Locking
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2012 5:05 am
by The Cunning Stunt
Don't get all butthurt. You can still pretend your model train sets are superconductor cryogenic railway systems of the future.