IGX

Seems the descendants of slaves are scientitiously fitter, stronger and faster. That's why they're so good at athletics. And why they can inspire "hatred" that's really jealousy and fear on the part of many insecure whites.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... inals.html

Olympic legend Michael Johnson says a ‘superior athletic gene’ in the descendants of West African slaves means black American and Caribbean sprinters will command the sport at the London Games.

A racist comment like that is going to have him suspended, sent home and apologizing in 3......2......5......4........3.......2.........10..........9......8.........7......6........

Terry B. wrote:

Olympic legend Michael Johnson says a ‘superior athletic gene’ in the descendants of West African slaves means black American and Caribbean sprinters will command the sport at the London Games.

A racist comment like that is going to have him suspended, sent home and apologizing in 3......2......5......4........3.......2.........10..........9......8.........7......6........

At 44 and a spectator, hmmm .... Not so much.

Who the hell doesn't/didn't know that? Barack Obama didn't inherit that gene. He ain't even good enough to beat white kids. That's why he ain't no real nigger.

It's a cute idea but no one has yet competently explained how a preponderance of fast twitch fibers translates to increased survival rates in extreme caloric deprivation or brutal working conditions. Intuitively, the opposite would be true.

It's actually more about a rich gene pool from a huge area of Africa, filtered to isolate high T levels which aided survival on brutal trips to the coast over land, and on journeys in cramped conditions on ships (where 50% to 90% mortality was the norm) followed by selective breeding for health and strength on the plantations. Jamaica was where the toughest strongest slaves ended up. Coincidence?

Blaidd Drwg wrote:It's a cute idea but no one has yet competently explained how a preponderance of fast twitch fibers translates to increased survival rates in extreme caloric deprivation or brutal working conditions. Intuitively, the opposite would be true.

Two words for you...man dingo. Maybe its one word. Breeding proclivity.

From: http://irongarmx.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=221877

Fat Cat wrote:

And from http://www.imdiversity.com/villages/afr ... ty1127.asp

According to the CDC of Vital Health Statistics, 60.1% of African-American males are overweight and 78% of Black women lead the population in obesity and being moderately overweight. In order to get to a solution, we must identify the problems.

Does the genetic trait in question just skip certain generations or individuals? OR is The White Man suppressing it with redily-available, cheap, junk food and fast food?

One would think that the obesity statistics would paint a completely different picture, if there were in existence some super-gene promoting vastly superior athleticism.

Furthermore, wouldn't it be better if folks just looked at great black athletes and told it like it is, vis-a-vis: He/She worked really fucking hard to get there ... ?

Think about it for a moment. What's better, telling somebody "There's a special genetic characteristic that you just might be born with, maybe" or "If you work hard, train hard, you might stand a damn good chance of accomplishing something, maybe, and you'd be a pussy if you were talented and didn't fucking try." ... ?

I get tired of all this Treat Certain People Like They're Special, And Use The Kid Gloves On Them Because They Were Oppressed crap. How about we just encourage everybody to work harder, and help them learn that achievement, and overcoming of obstacles is it's OWN REWARD, how about that? Would THAT help build a better society?

Just give the fucking credit where the credit is due. Good black athletes and good white athletes alike worked really fucking hard to be good athletes.

All that picture explains is why black dudes would rather be with white women.

WildGorillaMan wrote:All that picture explains is why black dudes would rather be with white women.

I dunno, there seems to be some speculation floating around on the internets about that as well:

I'll leave it to you lovers of interracial porn and armchair geneticists...but riddle me this.

If their gene pool is selected for all that hard work, why can't they seem to hold down a job?

Gorbachev wrote:Jamaica was where the toughest strongest slaves ended up. Coincidence?

I think a few other things could be happening in Jamaica to explain their recent success.

The only person dumber than Gorb/Rant is Michael Johnson.

To be as brief as possible, very few are capable of having this conversation on a level higher than Michael Johnson or Jimmy the Greek and refuse to fall into the ridiculous assumption that athletic differences are somehow driven by the recent African slave trade or some dipshit breeding program by Antebellum slave owners wherein they "bred that strong buck over yonder with that house mammy with the pretty face and big thighs". Anyone who has done a modicum of research has found that any athletic differences are likely the result of advantages/disadvantages conferred by differences in somatic topography, and that somatic topography is driven by the organism's necessity to deal with differing levels of heat, cold, and humidity.

As to any feelings of inferiority I might have as to the West African gene pool's consistent ability to produce champion sprinters, I can only respond by wondering if the average African descendant feels threatened or inferior by my ancestors abilities to create stable societies that brought law, order, industry, and education to much of the world that would have otherwise continued digging roots out of the ground with sticks to satisfy daily sustenance when they weren't busy worshipping the moon or burning down each other's villages. As it were, I have greatly matured over the years and I honestly don't think of these things in terms of superior/inferior as the survival rate of one's little corner of the gene pool is rarely determined by the average speed in the 100 meters. I could point to all the glorious cultural and technological achievements of my particular "race" (whatever that really means), and at the same time scoff in derision upon the meager achievements coming out of the African continent in spite of the fact that they sit upon the world's largest deposits of mineral resources...but, I won't.

What I will point out is the fact that it wasn't my great grand daddy that pulled cotton for free in Mississippi, or my great grand mother that got passed around behind the wood shed. I've been pointing that out for some time now, and the "superior niggers" have yet to file an adequate rebuttal.

Textbook reaction. QED.

The Crawdaddy wrote:

Terry B. wrote:

Olympic legend Michael Johnson says a ‘superior athletic gene’ in the descendants of West African slaves means black American and Caribbean sprinters will command the sport at the London Games.

A racist comment like that is going to have him suspended, sent home and apologizing in 3......2......5......4........3.......2.........10..........9......8.........7......6........

At 44 and a spectator, hmmm .... Not so much.

He's working over yonder during the Games.

Wow...Good thing he isn't a white female triple jumper or he would be sent home...he's just a big ole dumb nigger!!

KKKaz speaks Truth to PC bullshit when he points out that only minority folk are allowed to take pride in the collective accomplishments of their race. If a honky does it, that's racist.

Additionally, to folk whose self esteem revolves around some other brother's 100 yard dash time, I say: You didn't run that.