Page 1 of 1
Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:30 pm
by cleaner464
“Fact checkers come to this with their own sets of thoughts and beliefs, and we’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers.”
http://now.msn.com/romney-pollster-defe ... t-checkers
Bwahahah!
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:29 am
by DikTracy6000
Neither Party is big on fact checking. Having belonged to one party my whole life, they both disgust me in their tactics. I hope to see a third party in my lifetime with more than a snowball's chance to succeed.
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:46 am
by Grandpa's Spells
DikTracy6000 wrote:Neither Party is big on fact checking.
False equivalence.
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:50 am
by johno
So Ryan did actually throw his Grandmother off a cliff?
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:37 pm
by Andy83
Grandmother is a code word for racism.
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:56 pm
by DrDonkeyLove
If I was a protagonist for one of the parties, stacking the deck of fact checkers and fact check manipulations in general would be high on my list of priorities.
I only trust Andy for true objectivities.
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
by Andy83
DDL Objectivity is a code word for racism. Singular or plural
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:39 am
by Pinky
Grandpa's Spells wrote:DikTracy6000 wrote:Neither Party is big on fact checking.
False equivalence.
Agreed. They're all liars, but this reeks of the anti-intellectualism that has infected the Republican party.
Re: Almost too bizarre to be true
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:06 am
by Gene
Given the complexity of so many modern issues it is nice to see that a group of politicians have decided to offer their point of view, independent of what passes for Convention wisdom.
Anti-Intellectual? More like anti-Sophistry.