Page 1 of 2

Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:23 am
by Shafpocalypse Now

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:32 am
by powerlifter54
Summary
As my next class approached, I put the printout back in my backpack and walked out into the October sun. My mind was in turmoil, but there was one thing I knew for sure. I could no longer call myself pro-life,
True Genius.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:21 am
by DARTH
Translation. She left home, started to want to hang out with the cool kids, listened to the draft dodging ponytailed puke professors and joined the herd and used her pussy for a multi cultural mixing pit.

Just about everyone knows that around month 4 the fetus has feelings. The same cunts that would be aghast if you kicked a yapping dog in the jaw have no concern with causing the fetus pain and killing it.

She went from one team to another, because the new team offers less responsibilities and a way to be a ME Bitch while getting a bunch of new Liberal causes to cover up what a selfish twat she is. I love Libs, they have all this "We care about the poor, the dark" yet the tend to be the most cliquish people and use the political litmus test to exclude people. I see more Right leaning people with Left leaning friends than I see the other way.

But back to the main issue. Yes to birth control and yes to kicking abortion back to the individual states.

"Oh no, Sally might have to drive to the next state over to kill her baby!" well tough shit, if it's that important to kill your baby it, you'll find a way.

I'll be going down to the dental college in Richmond soon, because I can get what a dentist here would charge over $10,000 for around $1,000.

I was the one who was not anal about the issue, I was the one who put shit off, so I'll be the one driving back and forth to get the issues fixed.

If I was Thugutator I'd piss both sides off. Free rubbers! Abortion legal until 4 months, after that (Unless of medical issues confirmed by 2 separate MDs, rape or incest) the "Mother", the Dr. and anyone associated with it right up to the girl answering the phone at the clinic is guilty of murder and shot.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:33 am
by milosz
Just about everyone knows that around month 4 the fetus has feelings.
Your logic is impeccable.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:42 am
by milosz
The alternate to Darf's silent scream of rage against his betters:

Born to an insular bubble where one is raised to believe that any questioning of the prevailing dogma is tantamount to questioning God Himself, she accidentally escaped the daily reinforcement of this bubble and discovered these oddities called facts and statistics. Facts being stupid things, they don't support the fundie pro-life worldview - if you actually give a shit about good policy and savin' them babies, encouraging contraception is a no-brainer (as she says).

Once that first crack develops, you start to discover - courtesy of those blasted egghead professors in some cases, though apparently not this one - that almost everything you've been taught in Jesus School is a terrible and anti-human lie.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:22 am
by Batboy2/75
LOL, That article is a summer wonderland of inconsistent thought and logical fallacies. She has a bright future ahead of her writing for emplty headed women's magazines.

You can believe what you want, but I wouldn't be holding Libby up as champion for prochoice clear thinking. If she's that fucking retarded; the prolife movement must be breathing a sigh of relief she switched sides.

Damn Shaf, is this some angle for trolling for pussy? Targeting young empty headed female bloggers. A female blogger that is now cut loose from any inhibitions? You sly dog!

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:47 am
by Turdacious
milosz wrote:The alternate to Darf's silent scream of rage against his betters:

Born to an insular bubble where one is raised to believe that any questioning of the prevailing dogma is tantamount to questioning God Himself, she accidentally escaped the daily reinforcement of this bubble and discovered these oddities called facts and statistics. Facts being stupid things, they don't support the fundie pro-life worldview - if you actually give a shit about good policy and savin' them babies, encouraging contraception is a no-brainer (as she says).
Speaking of facts and statistics:

1. She doesn't know what the market prices for birth control are.
2. She's wrong about the elasticity of birth control.
3. There's little relationship between birth rates and the availability of birth control and abortion. Income level is what matters.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:42 am
by syaigh
And yet,

Banning abortion doesn't make the pregnancy wanted.
Banning abortion doesn't provide financially for the child once it is born. Or make sure it has good parents who won't abuse/neglect/kill it.
Birth control prevents abortions. So does sex education. So does good parenting.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:07 pm
by Shafpocalypse Now
Yeah. I love how everyone but syaigh dances around the legitimate takeaways. I have never understood why birth control and sex education was lumped into the things pro-lifers hate.

Darth just leaps to the conclusion that she loves black cock. I love that.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:14 pm
by Bob Wildes
Abortion is for pussies. I advocate genocide. :axe:

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:56 pm
by milosz
1. She doesn't know what the market prices for birth control are.
[...]
3. There's little relationship between birth rates and the availability of birth control and abortion. Income level is what matters.
Strong lols.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:14 pm
by kreator
Pro-life: on fetuses and elderlies, but not on criminals or foreigners
Pro-choice: on what lives in your body, but not on what substances go in your body

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:36 pm
by johno
I see birth as the key dividing line.
She pretty much went all the way over to the Dark Side. Anyone on IGx draw the line at birth? Aborting a viable fetus is morally acceptable?

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:37 pm
by Grandpa's Spells
johno wrote:
I see birth as the key dividing line.
She pretty much went all the way over to the Dark Side. Anyone on IGx draw the line at birth? Aborting a viable fetus is morally acceptable?
I favor abortion through the 39th trimester.

Re:

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 5:56 pm
by DARTH
Shafpocalypse Now wrote:Yeah. I love how everyone but syaigh dances around the legitimate takeaways. I have never understood why birth control and sex education was lumped into the things pro-lifers hate.

Darth just leaps to the conclusion that she loves black cock. I love that.
Well let's see, nice Bible bashed from birth Christian girl, goes off to college and instead of realising that there are some pretty stark hard lines in her upbringing that she no longer wants to adhere to she just runs over to the other side, full immersion into Lefty town instead of being a free thinker.

So many have to pick a side instead of knowing that the hardcore of both sides suck.

I've met so many of these it's not funny and many times they do indeed use their pussy as a test kit and end up many times with a kid with identity issues and no Daddy to show for it. (Or down to the clinic to purge it before she comes home on break, so Daddy keeps paying for school)

Never said Black, you went there and that proves the point, odds are she has. Don't care, some of my best friends like their pussy dark, some of my dark friends have white pussy. When it's out of love and what not it's totally cool but if it's a "Fuck You Daddy!" then she's a stupid cunt.

If your girls bring home a dark man, I bet you will be more critical of him until he proves he's a decent guy and not another subject for a Kaz post and if he proves to be a nigger I doubt you will be cool with it and some shit might go down.

I'm all for free Rubbers and Abortion as long as she gets it done before the 3 month mark, 4 is just a grace period. But the bitch can pay to kill her kid, not the Feds(our money) maybe her state.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:13 pm
by Lewis Medlock
DARTH wrote: I see more Right leaning people with Left leaning friends than I see the other way.
Darth you should think about that one.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:20 pm
by DARTH
I have. Maybe it's different where you live?

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:58 pm
by Shafpocalypse Now
I'm not sure of what you're saying.

But, I'd sure like it if people invalidated stereotypes.

You're right about trash being trash. My daughter had a cafe au lait classmate, and I'd always see her grandpa picking her up, and he was white...it was clear he loved that little girl more than anything and I would get chatting with her grandpa waiting to pick her up. His daughter intentionally got pregnant with a black guys kid to aggravate him (mom had passed away from cancer), and it turns out this ghetto thug was waiting for an opportunity to turn his shit around. This poor kids mom ran off after having her, and her dad and grandpa moved in together to raise her. Her grandpa sent her dad to college, he'd saved up for his daughter all his life, but she didn't want to go, so he got a degree as a mechanical engineer and works. The dad and grandpa still live together, the mother hasn't seen her daughter in 7 years.

Interesting twist on the same old story.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:13 pm
by DARTH
That is. Good on them both.

It's the rule of sociology that says that you can make a generalisation about a particular group based on data but those generalisations either partly fall or totally fall when applied to individuals.

Re:

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:52 pm
by DikTracy6000
Shafpocalypse Now wrote:I'm not sure of what you're saying.

But, I'd sure like it if people invalidated stereotypes.

You're right about trash being trash. My daughter had a cafe au lait classmate, and I'd always see her grandpa picking her up, and he was white...it was clear he loved that little girl more than anything and I would get chatting with her grandpa waiting to pick her up. His daughter intentionally got pregnant with a black guys kid to aggravate him (mom had passed away from cancer), and it turns out this ghetto thug was waiting for an opportunity to turn his shit around. This poor kids mom ran off after having her, and her dad and grandpa moved in together to raise her. Her grandpa sent her dad to college, he'd saved up for his daughter all his life, but she didn't want to go, so he got a degree as a mechanical engineer and works. The dad and grandpa still live together, the mother hasn't seen her daughter in 7 years.

Interesting twist on the same old story.
That's a Lifetime channel movie script if there ever was one. Do a storyboard and send it in.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:59 pm
by buckethead
johno wrote:
I see birth as the key dividing line.
She pretty much went all the way over to the Dark Side. Anyone on IGx draw the line at birth? Aborting a viable fetus is morally acceptable?
I would guess that most of us pro-choicers follow a smooth intellectual path from "No problem" (contraception, morning after) to "Unfortunate but acceptable" (first trimester) to "You better have a good fucking reason" (1 day after the first trimester) to "Get your sick fuck out of here" (late term).

To think all, or even most, pro-choicers are OK with late-term abortion is as silly as us thinking some Fundamentalist can't distinguish the difference between the abominations of homosexuality and shellfish.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:10 pm
by Shafpocalypse Now
What bucks said

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:23 pm
by syaigh
ditto

Moreso, being female, I don't want to have to get permission from the government to make decisions with my doctor or my daughter's doctor.

Maybe this latest legislation is only about late term abortions, but it seems to me that they are always pushing for more. A while back, that talk about birth control being abortifacients was pretty scary if you sat and thought about it. Just as scary to women as gun control talk is to a lot of you here. I'm not being facetious, control over my own body is a fundamental right and a lot of folks seem to think they have the right to have a say in what my doctor and I decide.

Either we want the government controlling our lives or we don't.

I don't.

I think if you want to change things, education and compassion is the way to go, not legislation.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:28 pm
by johno
BucketHead wrote:
johno wrote:
I see birth as the key dividing line.
She pretty much went all the way over to the Dark Side. Anyone on IGx draw the line at birth? Aborting a viable fetus is morally acceptable?
I would guess that most of us pro-choicers follow a smooth intellectual path from "No problem" (contraception, morning after) to "Unfortunate but acceptable" (first trimester) to "You better have a good fucking reason" (1 day after the first trimester) to "Get your sick fuck out of here" (late term).
...
IMO, that's where most Pro-Choicers are. And that's why I think her "drawing the line at birth" reveals her radical nature.

Also, I doubt that most Pro-Lifers have prohibiting birth control on their legislative agenda. So her whole "Pro Life Ain't" argument doesn't fly with me.

Re: Why "pro-life" ain't.

Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:31 pm
by DARTH
BucketHead wrote:
johno wrote:
I see birth as the key dividing line.
She pretty much went all the way over to the Dark Side. Anyone on IGx draw the line at birth? Aborting a viable fetus is morally acceptable?
I would guess that most of us pro-choicers follow a smooth intellectual path from "No problem" (contraception, morning after) to "Unfortunate but acceptable" (first trimester) to "You better have a good fucking reason" (1 day after the first trimester) to "Get your sick fuck out of here" (late term).

To think all, or even most, pro-choicers are OK with late-term abortion is as silly as us thinking some Fundamentalist can't distinguish the difference between the abominations of homosexuality and shellfish.
Maybe normal citizens who consider themselves pro-choice but not the cunts in the movement. Much like many blacks, these femmenazis are not about equality, they are about getting over or dominance.

Why did so much of the media ignore or barely cover the fucker in Philly or pine over Tiller eating a well deserved bullet?

So I'm sure your right Bux about the average person who says they are pro-choice but pretty much has no skin in that game.

Once she take the cum and a baby is formed, that's half daddy's so I think he should get a say (if around) after the first trimester as his child will feel the pain and be killed. Or maybe she can kill it but then the bitch needs to run and the law can look the other way when he clawhammers in her skull and rips out her brains?