ultracool wrote:Norman,
I have a couple of questions. How do you know the number of problems discussed in their forums is large compared to how many units they have sold? I don't see shit on the web as far as undependability goes. It always gets good reviews.
Are you saying GTD has no merit for anyone in any situation?
You are reading reviews for the iPhone / Touch app that fell in love with its look and simplicity. The problem is that you can't try it out without paying for. These "industry" reviews (I don't care if it is Merlin Mann or not) are not using this app enough and under enough conditions to determine if it is stable, nor viable in the long term.
Read the Things forum. Lotsa problems with syncing. The desktop became more buggy than it was in beta due to trying to accomodate the iPhone app.
Cultured Code should be giving away the iPhone app as it is (I know Apple does not let trial application to be hosted) and not charging $50 dollars for the desktop. That is an outrageous amount of money for an app that was effectively made worse once they started charging for it.
Things could be great if they get it right. The Hit List is the new kid on the block and looks better than Things, but wait till they try to get their iPhone app out there. It will caused a shit storm of problems. Llamagraphics Life Balance is probably the most stable and reliable app. That is because they have been at a long time and have done little development. The lack of development shows though in its clumsy interface, especially on the iPhone.
As to GTD, almost everyone I know and from the hours spent on the web discussing tweeking GTD, it seems a lot of GTDers spend more time getting GTD right than getting things done.
I think GTD helped me with a lot of ideas, but over all I find the system entirely too bloated and hackable. Take a look at OmniFocus. I mean WTF? Do you really need a fancy system to tell what tasks you can do while with your wife, standing in line at the grocery store, when you have wifi access?
I think ZTD tries to pair down GTD to something more reasonable for most folks.
Also I found that GTD kept me on task doing stuff that I (and others) thought was urgent / important and was losing the perspective on stuff that was not urgent but very important. This is a complaint from many users of the system.
For most people GTD is too much.
A lot of us nerds hack it to death.
Regardless of the altitude metaphors, I found that it did help me address how what I was doing fit into my values and long term goals.
These are not flaws in GTD as such and it fits specifics needs for a small number of people IMHO.
Autofocus and paper allow me to balance urgency and look at what exactly I am spending my time on. I found out that a lot of the stuff that I had resistance to doing when using GTD was simply because I didn't give a shit about it, so I dropped those responsibilities. I also found that spending just five minutes on a task and scratching it off then writing it down again and being able to do something else has helped get over a lot of procrastination.
But if GTD is working for you, great. If you are spending a lot of time on the system itself, I suggest another approach.