The couch thread

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux


tzg
Gunny
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by tzg »

I like how the CrossFit one costs more than all the others.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

friedquads wrote:Why?????

http://www.averagejoesracing.com/health ... sexpo.html
The Races will start and finish at the City of Suwanee Town Center Park Amp-Theater. The 5K &10K will be an out and back route though the beautiful Suwanee Greenway Park. The BLIMPIE Fun Run will take place around Town Center Park.
Date: Saturday, April 23rd 2011
Location: Suwanee Town Center Park located at the intersection of Lawrenceville Suwanee Road and Buford Hwy.
Times:
6:30AM - Race Day Registration begins
7:30AM -5K Start & CrossFit 5K "Angie" Start
8:00AM BLIMPIE Fun Run Start
8:30AM 10K Peachtree Qualifier Start

This presents an interesting situation. This event is sponsored by "No Excuses @fit", home of Kyle Maynard, the amputee phenom. The event is also run by and raises funds for an organization for children with special needs.
Now HQ may or may not have allowed the use of the @fit name for this event BUT don't you think that if they did, there would be a link on the sponsor's page to HQ ?
If they didn't;
1. Do they have their legal attack dogs go after a benefit for disabled children (and one of their own poster boys by proxy) ?
2. If they don't attack, then what would stop any other affiliate from using the name in a charity event ?
3. At what point then, does the name become part of the common lexicon and lose all branding (like Pilates) ?
4. Can HQ afford to just sit silently by and not unleash the hounds ?
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Holland Oates
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:32 am
Location: GAWD'S Country
Contact:

Re: The couch thread

Post by Holland Oates »

Haven't our resident lawyers already concluded that they really can't enforce @fit as a brand name since they aren't selling franchises. I think it's already too late for them to sick their legal dogs on anyone. They pride themselves in saying @fit is everything and everything is @fit.
Southern Hospitality Is Aggressive Hospitality

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

Ed Zachary wrote:Haven't our resident lawyers already concluded that they really can't enforce @fit as a brand name since they aren't selling franchises. I think it's already too late for them to sick their legal dogs on anyone. They pride themselves in saying @fit is everything and everything is @fit.
You can SEO the shit out of your site and make everything look like a @fit page/site and they can't do a thing about it.


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by TerryB »

Cave Canem wrote:Now HQ may or may not have allowed the use of the @fit name for this event BUT don't you think that if they did, there would be a link on the sponsor's page to HQ ?
If they didn't;
1. Do they have their legal attack dogs go after a benefit for disabled children (and one of their own poster boys by proxy) ?
2. If they don't attack, then what would stop any other affiliate from using the name in a charity event ?
3. At what point then, does the name become part of the common lexicon and lose all branding (like Pilates) ?
4. Can HQ afford to just sit silently by and not unleash the hounds ?
Welcome to about 400-500 pages ago.
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

protobuilder wrote:
Cave Canem wrote:Now HQ may or may not have allowed the use of the @fit name for this event BUT don't you think that if they did, there would be a link on the sponsor's page to HQ ?
If they didn't;
1. Do they have their legal attack dogs go after a benefit for disabled children (and one of their own poster boys by proxy) ?
2. If they don't attack, then what would stop any other affiliate from using the name in a charity event ?
3. At what point then, does the name become part of the common lexicon and lose all branding (like Pilates) ?
4. Can HQ afford to just sit silently by and not unleash the hounds ?
Welcome to about 400-500 pages ago.
Mea maxima culpa
I was still withdrawing from the kool aid back then. But I thought the focus at that time was making fun of Vibrams monkey feet shoes.
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

Cave Canem wrote:
protobuilder wrote:
Cave Canem wrote:Now HQ may or may not have allowed the use of the @fit name for this event BUT don't you think that if they did, there would be a link on the sponsor's page to HQ ?
If they didn't;
1. Do they have their legal attack dogs go after a benefit for disabled children (and one of their own poster boys by proxy) ?
2. If they don't attack, then what would stop any other affiliate from using the name in a charity event ?
3. At what point then, does the name become part of the common lexicon and lose all branding (like Pilates) ?
4. Can HQ afford to just sit silently by and not unleash the hounds ?
Welcome to about 400-500 pages ago.
Mea maxima culpa
I was still withdrawing from the kool aid back then. But I thought the focus at that time was making fun of Vibrams monkey feet shoes.

Well, that and staring at Barky's tits.


tzg
Gunny
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by tzg »

Yes I Have Balls wrote:
Cave Canem wrote:
protobuilder wrote:
Cave Canem wrote:Now HQ may or may not have allowed the use of the @fit name for this event BUT don't you think that if they did, there would be a link on the sponsor's page to HQ ?
If they didn't;
1. Do they have their legal attack dogs go after a benefit for disabled children (and one of their own poster boys by proxy) ?
2. If they don't attack, then what would stop any other affiliate from using the name in a charity event ?
3. At what point then, does the name become part of the common lexicon and lose all branding (like Pilates) ?
4. Can HQ afford to just sit silently by and not unleash the hounds ?
Welcome to about 400-500 pages ago.
Mea maxima culpa
I was still withdrawing from the kool aid back then. But I thought the focus at that time was making fun of Vibrams monkey feet shoes.

Well, that and staring at Barky's tits.
Tell us more about this.

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

tzg wrote:
Yes I Have Balls wrote:
Cave Canem wrote:
protobuilder wrote:
Cave Canem wrote:Now HQ may or may not have allowed the use of the @fit name for this event BUT don't you think that if they did, there would be a link on the sponsor's page to HQ ?
If they didn't;
1. Do they have their legal attack dogs go after a benefit for disabled children (and one of their own poster boys by proxy) ?
2. If they don't attack, then what would stop any other affiliate from using the name in a charity event ?
3. At what point then, does the name become part of the common lexicon and lose all branding (like Pilates) ?
4. Can HQ afford to just sit silently by and not unleash the hounds ?
Welcome to about 400-500 pages ago.
Mea maxima culpa
I was still withdrawing from the kool aid back then. But I thought the focus at that time was making fun of Vibrams monkey feet shoes.

Well, that and staring at Barky's tits.
Tell us more about this.
I'm sure many have their own personal favorites. QED.

Image

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

one moar

Image

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

Cave Canem wrote:
Mea maxima culpa
I was still withdrawing from the kool aid back then. But I thought the focus at that time was making fun of Vibrams monkey feet shoes.

Hey, easy on the Speciesism!
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

Already a third of the way to two million views. Things are coming to a head.
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

Yes I Have Balls wrote:one moar

Image

Some things stand the test of internet time.

Are those puppies natural or is that something only B-Boi and however many of her rumored conquests know for sure ?
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

OR did I just go back 500 pages again ?
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

WildGorillaMan wrote:
Cave Canem wrote:
Mea maxima culpa
I was still withdrawing from the kool aid back then. But I thought the focus at that time was making fun of Vibrams monkey feet shoes.

Hey, easy on the Speciesism!
No offense, Apebro.
Attachments
103133_01_Md.jpg
103133_01_Md.jpg (28.59 KiB) Viewed 7370 times
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

WildGorillaMan wrote:Already a third of the way to two million views. Things are coming to a head.
"Best of the Internet!"


CultBuster
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 378
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:49 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by CultBuster »

http://games.crossfit.com/features/vide ... n-week-2-0

It is such a shit storm that they sit on a video and call bullshit on the leaders and questioned the standards used by these guys. NICE!


tzg
Gunny
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by tzg »

They could've avoided this by selecting things where movement standards aren't that big of a deal. I mean, CF standards for box jumps, pushups, etc are just weird (I don't know what they actually are, I'd have to watch a CF video that doesn't involve andro babes). It's clear the only thing they've really thought through rigorously is how to get the $10 entry fee from people...

EDIT: and, seriously, who demands "squat clean and jerks"? requiring a squat in it penalizes the people who are strong enough to power that thing up without even bending the knees. they don't want somebody to donny shankle this workout is the thing. I'm not as offended by their insistence on a jerk rather than push presses.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

tzg wrote:They could've avoided this by selecting things where movement standards aren't that big of a deal. I mean, CF standards for box jumps, pushups, etc are just weird (I don't know what they actually are, I'd have to watch a CF video that doesn't involve andro babes). It's clear the only thing they've really thought through rigorously is how to get the $10 entry fee from people...

EDIT: and, seriously, who demands "squat clean and jerks"? requiring a squat in it penalizes the people who are strong enough to power that thing up without even bending the knees. they don't want somebody to donny shankle this workout is the thing. I'm not as offended by their insistence on a jerk rather than push presses.
But there is no insistence on a jerk.....They can come out of the squat into a thruster, push press, press, push jerk or just jerk it. It's basically,"get the bar to the bottom of a front squat anyhow and then get it overhead anyhow". It's amazing that they have a video to show what the "standards" are !
For the few who can handle the weight, this will be "pick the bar up, thruster, throw the bar down..repeat for 5 minutes".
Tantum validus superstes


tzg
Gunny
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by tzg »

Well, if you can press or push press, then, whatevs. Still silly to insist on the squat. I couldn't bother to watch the video because, well, why the hell would I watch the video? I don't care enough. I barely care enough to write this comment because of the mild douchenfreude the whole phenomenon gives me.


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by TerryB »

Naive Online Workout Competitor wrote:I am not mad or upset as I believe I have submitted a valid performance and if people/affiliates want to get to the regionals by cheating then so be it. I performed to the standard set and anything less than that even though it ended up being allowed, I feel would be a poor representation of myself, my coach and my gym.

I would like to know, how many affiliates are being watched by HQ for validating inadequate performances. Will we actually see any gyms have their affiliation revoked?
How cute. She thinks this is about something other than $$$.
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

the vast majority of @fitters will submit honest times and scores, but there are going to be people that are going to cheat, every sporting event has that, people trying to get an edge. Its a fact of life.

When you have a million dollar purse at stake, some people will do whatever they can to get a chance to win that.

The excuse that the cheaters will get exposed at regionals is pointless, because cheaters can hurt a person who put up a legit score and prevent them from moving on.


tzg
Gunny
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by tzg »

"Cheating". There's a difference between cheating and doing whatever you can get away with in front of a judge. In the context of something like this, if the judge's word is final and the judge counts what you're doing as good, you're good. To compare to baseball, this is like the umpire making a bad call when the ball beat the runner - the runner benefits but didn't cheat - as opposed to deliberating cutting corners rather than touching the bases or putting superballs inside your bat or throwing a spitball. This is mostly what's going on, there aren't that many people truly cheating here.

But, hell, what the hell do I care? This whole thing is just silly, but I find some mild amount of entertainment in watching the whole thing mismanaged.


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by TerryB »

tzg wrote:This whole thing is just silly, but I find some mild amount of entertainment in watching the whole thing mismanaged.
I'm mildly amused that someone figured out how to make $$$ by having people pay to have other people watch them workout. It's the ultimate bro scheme.

Bro 1: "Yo man, want me to count reps for ya, bro?"

Bro 2: "Yeah, cool man."

Bro 1: "Aight. Got $20?"

Bro 2: "I gotta pay you to count my reps, dude??"

Bro 1: "Yeah man. How else will you know which ones count??"

Bro 2: "Aight. Here ya go."
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image


tzg
Gunny
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by tzg »

protobuilder wrote:
tzg wrote:This whole thing is just silly, but I find some mild amount of entertainment in watching the whole thing mismanaged.
I'm mildly amused that someone figured out how to make $$$ by having people pay to have other people watch them workout. It's the ultimate bro scheme.

Bro 1: "Yo man, want me to count reps for ya, bro?"

Bro 2: "Yeah, cool man."

Bro 1: "Aight. Got $20?"

Bro 2: "I gotta pay you to count my reps, dude??"

Bro 1: "Yeah man. How else will you know which ones count??"

Bro 2: "Aight. Here ya go."
The truly amazing thing is that the site only works well for taking your money, not for submitting and watching videos, apparently.

Post Reply