The couch thread

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11367
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Grandpa's Spells »

stosh wrote:
The male body has arrived. Not only is it being offered up for scrutiny, it seems to be both hypermasculine and strangely feminine, a new mix that accurately reflects tremendous and ambivalent changes in our culture.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles ... _foodndiet
That's from 1994.
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar

stosh
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3998
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Motorin' around the South

Re: The couch thread

Post by stosh »

Grandpa's Spells wrote:
stosh wrote:
The male body has arrived. Not only is it being offered up for scrutiny, it seems to be both hypermasculine and strangely feminine, a new mix that accurately reflects tremendous and ambivalent changes in our culture.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles ... _foodndiet
That's from 1994.
So? The quote still seems quite relevant today and to the pic of a man with shaved body parts.

14 years ain't that long ago, ya know Spells.
A novice is someone who keeps asking himself if he is a novice. An intermediate is someone who is sick of training with weak people and an advanced person doesn't give a shit anymore. - Jim Wendler


Gin Master
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3024
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Gin Master »

If a smooth-chested tatted up douchebag with a mohawk that pulls his board shorts down to his pubes is the "new male," then we really are in trouble.

I didn't know we had a BBoy smiley giving ANYC the shocker.

:supz:

User avatar

The Real Rant
Anal Sadist
Posts: 5014
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:35 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by The Real Rant »

Shaf wrote:A Navy Corpsman I know sez:
Crossfit? Fuck. Marines bench and curl. That's what they do.


Shaf brings up an interesting point about what bad asses do. I live in a neighborhood renowned for tough charters. All these Boston based movies from Good Will Hunting on were based on and filmed in my neighborhood. Plenty of wannabes for sure but I know some pretty hard dudes and their workouts pretty much consist of bench and curls with some heavy bag work. That’s assuming they even workout in which they’d be inclined just to stab or shoot you if you were a problem. If you were seen doing @fit at the L Street Gym in Southie it would be a given that you take it up the keister.


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by TerryB »

I posted this video in response to an avid Cultfitter's insistence that in Cultfit, "we are able to perform ...at an extraordinarily high level of power output."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trUE4W11D7Y

Everyone had a good chuckle at this vulgar display of power.
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image

User avatar

Sofa King
Top
Posts: 2346
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:33 pm
Location: Loge 139, row k, seat 1
Contact:

Re: The couch thread

Post by Sofa King »

3 new pics from the certs and no cooch in sight. I've got to see that rug he's wearing from a better angle.
WGM wrote:Fall off a chinup bar, drop a barbell on your head, or piss yourself at the bottom of a squat and the Internet will never forget you.


Yogalete
Top
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yogalete »

Why stop with 700 lbs deadlifts? Now 59 minute 1/2 marathoners can crossfit to greater performance.

http://media.crossfit.com/cf-video/Cros ... r_BMac.mov
"All you have to do is decide that wherever you are is the best place there is. Once you start comparing one place to another, there's no end to it."- Sodo Yokoyama


losabio
Corporal
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:53 pm

Re:

Post by losabio »

Gary John wrote:Image


What part about azn was so unclear?

I'm disappointed but will share.

If she danced topless, she could blacken both eyes.
A few posts ago, someone mentioned that this epic thread was two years old. I decided that it was my duty as an IGx denizen to read the thread from the beginning, and lookit what I found from late 2007. I think I recognize that trust fund baby!

The part where Couch berates Josh Hillis and calls PL54 super obese always makes me LOL at its absurdity.


Gin Master
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3024
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am

Re: Re:

Post by Gin Master »

losabio wrote:
Gary John wrote:Image


What part about azn was so unclear?

I'm disappointed but will share.

If she danced topless, she could blacken both eyes.
A few posts ago, someone mentioned that this epic thread was two years old. I decided that it was my duty as an IGx denizen to read the thread from the beginning, and lookit what I found from late 2007. I think I recognize that trust fund baby!

The part where Couch berates Josh Hillis and calls PL54 super obese always makes me LOL at its absurdity.
Thank you for your service.
Fran (mod 70lb barbell)

9:40
Comment #119 - Posted by: Josh Hillis at January 5, 2006 12:08 AM

----------

Josh Hillis!

It's been called to my attention, sadly, that you:

a. Posted on Dragon Door that I say stupid things on the Internet all the time: here's your chance to give concrete examples or apologize for your trying to find friends and fit in at Dragon Door by saying stupid things on the Internet. In that I never post away from CF, it must be something I said here.

b. Found great humor in my limp: on this item I can only offer that had anyone but yours truly been the butt of that you would be banned from CrossFit for life and your certifications would be revoked. I don't find making fun of disability funny and those who do so repugnant. You are the first CF trainer to embarrass CrossFit.

For the record, your total inability to control even simple movements was of such concern at both CF seminars that my staff didn't want you cert'd. I intervened and asked Lani and others to give extra time to you before each day to work on the fundamentals so that you might find success rather than defeat with simple skills. How did you manage to leave that out when the subject of CrossFit and our relative emphasis on technique and form came up vis-�-vis the NYT slam?

Finally, it's been two weeks since the NYT piece and I'm no longer overweight (though I still limp), but I'm betting that Mark is still afraid to come around, Jack is still morbidly obese, Stephen still has a 30 minute Fran, you're still uncoordinated, and Pavel still losing his best (Jeff Martone just this weekend) talent to a program of higher standards, greater efficacy, and integrity.
Comment #120 - Posted by: Coach at January 5, 2006 3:18 AM

----------

Dear Coach Glassman,

I think we just had a big misunderstaning. First, to remove those sentences from the context that they were in changes the meaning completely. And of course over the internet, tone is never clear.

On the Dragon Door Forum, CrossFit was being slammed because you are known for attacking people personally when they disagree with you. I said “Greg says stupid shit all the time, and that doesn’t mean that CrossFit doesn’t work”, what I meant was that just because you attack people’s character, it bears no reflection on the CrossFit Program you have so brilliantly developed.

Then the other post was totally lighthearted, and if it offended you that was not my intention. If I made you feel bad about your injury, I totally apologize. It was not my intention at all to take a shot at your injury, and this truly is the problem of written word versus conversing in person. If you knew me, if we could talk, there would be no question that I’m not the kind of person who would ever do that. I didn’t think that saying you “had a gangsta limp” was at anyone’s expense. If I had a knee injury, I’d call it my gangsta limp. Nothing in that post was mean spirited or meant to hurt you. The whole post was a joke. No part of it was meant to have any mean spirit to it at all, and I'm guessing that the reason it occured as mean was because you still had a bad taste in their mouth from the NYT article or what all the other DDers were saying.

The Dragon Door crew was hammering that you weren’t a good Coach because you don’t work out. I lightheartedly said that “It’s not an injury, it’s a gangsta limp.” I never thought that you would take that badly at all. Truly, I thought if you read it you would have the opposite reaction. Like: "Hell with the NYT and the DD crew, it's gangsta limp." If I had thought for a second that you would take that in any way but fun, I would not have said it. I never thought it could be construed as mean spirited. And that it clearly landed poorly with you, I am truly, truly sorry. Really, it was totally my bad and I am sorry. I do not find great humor in your limp, and I never meant for it to appear that way, I am truly sorry.

I think this is totally a misunderstanding, and I totally get how you would be pissed off about it, and I take total responsibility for the fact that it didn't land right. I totally get where all of your points are coming from. I'm truly sorry that it made you feel that way. I just really want you to know that it was not my intention.

These were both in the midst of half a dozen posts I made defending CrossFit. Some of the posts I was totally serious. Other posts I was poking fun at how ridiculous the discussion had gotten. The whole time I was defending CrossFit. You mention that I might have been “trying desperately to make friends at Dragon Door”, trust me, there is nothing less popular a person could do than defend CrossFit at Dragon Door.

My apologies. I feel that the spirit of what I said came across way too harshly, and with your injury, completely the opposite of my intention. I never meant for this to occur as mean or spiteful, and I totally apologize.

Josh Hillis
Comment #130 - Posted by: Josh Hillis at January 8, 2006 1:45 AM

----------

Josh Hillis,

You are making everything worse. Much worse.

“CrossFit was being slammed because you are known for attacking people personally when they disagree with you”

This is pure bull-shit. I attack the character of people for being unethical shitbags. It’s now your turn. I attacked one of your KB friends/elites for his racist comments and abuse of a young Pararescue trainee all for being black and wearing a CrossFit T-shirt at Pararescue jump-school where he is the bus driver. I attacked another guy’s character for taking a thread on CrossFit private sending G-Mac an email claiming to have secret knowledge of a gaggle of CrossFit-injured NSW personnel. G-Mac and the Doc’s at NSW know it’s a lie. The guy didn’t know of our work or contacts at NSW. He was suggesting, hell stating, that the NSW personnel considering CrossFit ought to come train with him and stay away from dangerous CrossFit. If ANYONE knows of an entire group hurt CrossFitting and can only talk about it privately they are being unethical. We all have an obligation to share first with the purveyor and then with the public any injuries endemic to any regimen. I couldn’t share all the details because G-Mac asked me not to let the dude know that he’d sent me the email. Shortly thereafter G-Mac released me from my promise. I challenged the guy to publicly deny my accusations of his unethical behavior. He never did.

You can't come up with an example of me attacking someones character for disagreeing with me. I can’t even imagine doing that. Most people disagree with me on most things and I don’t spend very much time attacking anyone. You are an asshole for saying so. Let’s be perfectly clear – I AM ATTACKING YOUR CHARACTER.

“The Dragon Door crew was hammering that you weren’t a good Coach because you don’t work out.”

Where did my not working out come from? It came from the NYT. Cooperman asked if I did the WOD every day. I said, “no, I’m usually experimenting on myself and others with protocols that will quickly be abandoned and it would be unethical to spread them to the community at large adding that most of what we monkey with will never make it to wider audience.” I also let her know that locally we only rarely do the WOD because I have better options, trainers, and equipment than does the cyber community of CrossFit. I also told her I had a penchant for bicycles that kept me from being as fit as I might. I was the original CrossFitter and I can, at 49, still outperform more CrossFitters than not.

And now I’m attacking your character for repeating the absurd charge. Note: not for you disagreeing with me but for your total lack of character in repeating that baseless NYT nonsense at DD and here. That it is coming from such incredibly weak performers as Jack (super-obese), you (9:40 70 lb, Fran), Stephen (26 minute Fran), and the rest of the best of the DD crew who perform at less than half the output of CrossFit women while also claiming CrossFit to be of limited efficacy (Here you’re innocent) makes me nauseous. Nearly all of the DD elite have either come to CrossFit and folded (very publicly collapsed and given up, come in last of 60+, been crushed by our women, rhabdoed) or hide behind nonsenical theoretical objections (e.g., adaptations are cyclic, not linear, therefor CF sucks, I'd like to see these CFers in 50 years, etc) and I have protected the reputations of all those who folded by never mentioning their limited fitness.

Poke fun of my limp as a friend – we’re cool. I’ve thicker skin than you’ll ever be able to understand. But when it comes from someone who falsely accuses me of routine character assassinations and stupidity, and sees fit to repeat NYT charges as fact, it becomes making fun of disability.

We have a therapy for injuries here at CrossFit called STFU. It’s your turn to take some. One more peep from you, Josh, and I'm going to ask and then follow Lynne Pitts recommendation on dealing with you. I'd take the STFU.
Comment #131 - Posted by: Coach at January 8, 2006 6:24 AM
What a classy guy.

User avatar

Gary John
Gunny
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:23 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Gary John »

Thank you for the mammaries.
Image

User avatar

powerlifter54
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7976
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
Location: TX

Re: Re:

Post by powerlifter54 »

Gin Master wrote:
losabio wrote:
Gary John wrote:Image


What part about azn was so unclear?

I'm disappointed but will share.

If she danced topless, she could blacken both eyes.
A few posts ago, someone mentioned that this epic thread was two years old. I decided that it was my duty as an IGx denizen to read the thread from the beginning, and lookit what I found from late 2007. I think I recognize that trust fund baby!

The part where Couch berates Josh Hillis and calls PL54 super obese always makes me LOL at its absurdity.
Thank you for your service.
Fran (mod 70lb barbell)

9:40
Comment #119 - Posted by: Josh Hillis at January 5, 2006 12:08 AM

----------

Josh Hillis!

It's been called to my attention, sadly, that you:

a. Posted on Dragon Door that I say stupid things on the Internet all the time: here's your chance to give concrete examples or apologize for your trying to find friends and fit in at Dragon Door by saying stupid things on the Internet. In that I never post away from CF, it must be something I said here.

b. Found great humor in my limp: on this item I can only offer that had anyone but yours truly been the butt of that you would be banned from CrossFit for life and your certifications would be revoked. I don't find making fun of disability funny and those who do so repugnant. You are the first CF trainer to embarrass CrossFit.

For the record, your total inability to control even simple movements was of such concern at both CF seminars that my staff didn't want you cert'd. I intervened and asked Lani and others to give extra time to you before each day to work on the fundamentals so that you might find success rather than defeat with simple skills. How did you manage to leave that out when the subject of CrossFit and our relative emphasis on technique and form came up vis-�-vis the NYT slam?

Finally, it's been two weeks since the NYT piece and I'm no longer overweight (though I still limp), but I'm betting that Mark is still afraid to come around, Jack is still morbidly obese, Stephen still has a 30 minute Fran, you're still uncoordinated, and Pavel still losing his best (Jeff Martone just this weekend) talent to a program of higher standards, greater efficacy, and integrity.
Comment #120 - Posted by: Coach at January 5, 2006 3:18 AM

----------

Dear Coach Glassman,

I think we just had a big misunderstaning. First, to remove those sentences from the context that they were in changes the meaning completely. And of course over the internet, tone is never clear.

On the Dragon Door Forum, CrossFit was being slammed because you are known for attacking people personally when they disagree with you. I said “Greg says stupid shit all the time, and that doesn’t mean that CrossFit doesn’t work”, what I meant was that just because you attack people’s character, it bears no reflection on the CrossFit Program you have so brilliantly developed.

Then the other post was totally lighthearted, and if it offended you that was not my intention. If I made you feel bad about your injury, I totally apologize. It was not my intention at all to take a shot at your injury, and this truly is the problem of written word versus conversing in person. If you knew me, if we could talk, there would be no question that I’m not the kind of person who would ever do that. I didn’t think that saying you “had a gangsta limp” was at anyone’s expense. If I had a knee injury, I’d call it my gangsta limp. Nothing in that post was mean spirited or meant to hurt you. The whole post was a joke. No part of it was meant to have any mean spirit to it at all, and I'm guessing that the reason it occured as mean was because you still had a bad taste in their mouth from the NYT article or what all the other DDers were saying.

The Dragon Door crew was hammering that you weren’t a good Coach because you don’t work out. I lightheartedly said that “It’s not an injury, it’s a gangsta limp.” I never thought that you would take that badly at all. Truly, I thought if you read it you would have the opposite reaction. Like: "Hell with the NYT and the DD crew, it's gangsta limp." If I had thought for a second that you would take that in any way but fun, I would not have said it. I never thought it could be construed as mean spirited. And that it clearly landed poorly with you, I am truly, truly sorry. Really, it was totally my bad and I am sorry. I do not find great humor in your limp, and I never meant for it to appear that way, I am truly sorry.

I think this is totally a misunderstanding, and I totally get how you would be pissed off about it, and I take total responsibility for the fact that it didn't land right. I totally get where all of your points are coming from. I'm truly sorry that it made you feel that way. I just really want you to know that it was not my intention.

These were both in the midst of half a dozen posts I made defending CrossFit. Some of the posts I was totally serious. Other posts I was poking fun at how ridiculous the discussion had gotten. The whole time I was defending CrossFit. You mention that I might have been “trying desperately to make friends at Dragon Door”, trust me, there is nothing less popular a person could do than defend CrossFit at Dragon Door.

My apologies. I feel that the spirit of what I said came across way too harshly, and with your injury, completely the opposite of my intention. I never meant for this to occur as mean or spiteful, and I totally apologize.

Josh Hillis
Comment #130 - Posted by: Josh Hillis at January 8, 2006 1:45 AM

----------

Josh Hillis,

You are making everything worse. Much worse.

“CrossFit was being slammed because you are known for attacking people personally when they disagree with you”

This is pure bull-shit. I attack the character of people for being unethical shitbags. It’s now your turn. I attacked one of your KB friends/elites for his racist comments and abuse of a young Pararescue trainee all for being black and wearing a CrossFit T-shirt at Pararescue jump-school where he is the bus driver. I attacked another guy’s character for taking a thread on CrossFit private sending G-Mac an email claiming to have secret knowledge of a gaggle of CrossFit-injured NSW personnel. G-Mac and the Doc’s at NSW know it’s a lie. The guy didn’t know of our work or contacts at NSW. He was suggesting, hell stating, that the NSW personnel considering CrossFit ought to come train with him and stay away from dangerous CrossFit. If ANYONE knows of an entire group hurt CrossFitting and can only talk about it privately they are being unethical. We all have an obligation to share first with the purveyor and then with the public any injuries endemic to any regimen. I couldn’t share all the details because G-Mac asked me not to let the dude know that he’d sent me the email. Shortly thereafter G-Mac released me from my promise. I challenged the guy to publicly deny my accusations of his unethical behavior. He never did.

You can't come up with an example of me attacking someones character for disagreeing with me. I can’t even imagine doing that. Most people disagree with me on most things and I don’t spend very much time attacking anyone. You are an asshole for saying so. Let’s be perfectly clear – I AM ATTACKING YOUR CHARACTER.

“The Dragon Door crew was hammering that you weren’t a good Coach because you don’t work out.”

Where did my not working out come from? It came from the NYT. Cooperman asked if I did the WOD every day. I said, “no, I’m usually experimenting on myself and others with protocols that will quickly be abandoned and it would be unethical to spread them to the community at large adding that most of what we monkey with will never make it to wider audience.” I also let her know that locally we only rarely do the WOD because I have better options, trainers, and equipment than does the cyber community of CrossFit. I also told her I had a penchant for bicycles that kept me from being as fit as I might. I was the original CrossFitter and I can, at 49, still outperform more CrossFitters than not.

And now I’m attacking your character for repeating the absurd charge. Note: not for you disagreeing with me but for your total lack of character in repeating that baseless NYT nonsense at DD and here. That it is coming from such incredibly weak performers as Jack (super-obese), you (9:40 70 lb, Fran), Stephen (26 minute Fran), and the rest of the best of the DD crew who perform at less than half the output of CrossFit women while also claiming CrossFit to be of limited efficacy (Here you’re innocent) makes me nauseous. Nearly all of the DD elite have either come to CrossFit and folded (very publicly collapsed and given up, come in last of 60+, been crushed by our women, rhabdoed) or hide behind nonsenical theoretical objections (e.g., adaptations are cyclic, not linear, therefor CF sucks, I'd like to see these CFers in 50 years, etc) and I have protected the reputations of all those who folded by never mentioning their limited fitness.

Poke fun of my limp as a friend – we’re cool. I’ve thicker skin than you’ll ever be able to understand. But when it comes from someone who falsely accuses me of routine character assassinations and stupidity, and sees fit to repeat NYT charges as fact, it becomes making fun of disability.

We have a therapy for injuries here at CrossFit called STFU. It’s your turn to take some. One more peep from you, Josh, and I'm going to ask and then follow Lynne Pitts recommendation on dealing with you. I'd take the STFU.
Comment #131 - Posted by: Coach at January 8, 2006 6:24 AM
What a classy guy.
It is Posts like this that keep the focus pure.
"Start slowly, then ease off". Tortuga Golden Striders Running Club, Pensacola 1984.

"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex


kitosho
Sarge
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:09 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by kitosho »

kitosho wrote:a grizzled old curmudgeon with a limp, a bad attitude, and a habit of self-medication?

























Image




as an aside, i just remembered that House's first name is Greg


there's only one small difference: House possesses a near-superhuman intellect, whereas Glassman's head is devoid of content save for a small nerve bundle containing various insults and the words "efficacy" and "neuroendocrine" repeated many, many times
THE END IS NIGH


steelydan
Sarge
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:33 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by steelydan »

kitosho wrote:the words "efficacy" and "neuroendocrine" repeated many, many times
Don't forget "modal."


kitosho
Sarge
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:09 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by kitosho »

modalities
THE END IS NIGH

User avatar

RPC
Sarge
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 1:20 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by RPC »

Oh and Concomitant, LOL.

I'm starting to read posts where the lemmings are using his vernacular too...

User avatar

Danny John
Gunny
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:51 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Danny John »

"Concomitant" is the term John Powell started using in the 1980's to describe the foot work on an explosive throw. I love the word...


JamesonBushmill
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:07 pm
Location: Balanced precariously on the end of Eva's Clit

Re: The couch thread

Post by JamesonBushmill »

kitosho wrote:
kitosho wrote:a grizzled old curmudgeon with a limp, a bad attitude, and a habit of self-medication?

here's only one small difference: House possesses a near-superhuman intellect, whereas Glassman's head is devoid of content save for a small nerve bundle containing various insults and the words "efficacy" and "neuroendocrine" repeated many, many times
glassman does however rock a gangster merkin on his melon, so he does have that over the TV gimp.
Females who wear heels emulate the gait patterns of wounded and/or compromised prey and thus inspire males to heights of predatorial chasse-a-tude. - Robb Wolf

User avatar

stosh
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3998
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Motorin' around the South

Re: The couch thread

Post by stosh »

The lingo stuff is hard to get used to. Is this rhabdo?

http://blog.crossfitsantacruzcentral.co ... ssfit.aspx
A novice is someone who keeps asking himself if he is a novice. An intermediate is someone who is sick of training with weak people and an advanced person doesn't give a shit anymore. - Jim Wendler

User avatar

Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11367
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Grandpa's Spells »

stosh wrote:The lingo stuff is hard to get used to. Is this rhabdo?

http://blog.crossfitsantacruzcentral.co ... ssfit.aspx
GHB
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar

Schlegel
Top
Posts: 2161
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:21 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: The couch thread

Post by Schlegel »

Come on people! Am I the only one who noticed this!!
Attachments
dbags.jpg
dbags.jpg (38.74 KiB) Viewed 6514 times
"Why do we need a kitchen when we have a phone?"


___________
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7502
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:12 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by ___________ »

Couch wrote:I was the original CrossFitter and I can, at 49, still outperform more CrossFitters than not.
A great physical program that leaves the average unable to beat an obese, gin addicted, cripple 49 year old.................

User avatar

Mickey O'neil
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: The Pale Blue Dot

Re: The couch thread

Post by Mickey O'neil »

Schlegel wrote:Come on people! Am I the only one who noticed this!!

Yes I did and I was wondering how and why this group of people are together.

User avatar

The Real Rant
Anal Sadist
Posts: 5014
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:35 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by The Real Rant »

Schlegel wrote:Come on people! Am I the only one who noticed this!!
I picked this up from her myspace. She claims to have gone to an RKC cert.

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

Pavel, Waterbury, and Alwyn Cosgrove did a seminar together in early 08, I think

User avatar

Mickey O'neil
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: The Pale Blue Dot

Re: The couch thread

Post by Mickey O'neil »

That's right. I didn't recognize Cosgrove. That was when he was on the meds or after treatment for cancer and ballooned up a bit. Right?

Post Reply