hot enough for ya?
Moderator: Dux
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
nice post, turd
who is the russian who did the study--wild bill's uncle?
who is the russian who did the study--wild bill's uncle?
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: hot enough for ya?
A scientist of more stature than couch's father. No clue otherwise.dead man walking wrote:nice post, turd
who is the russian who did the study--wild bill's uncle?
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
heard bill mckibben speak yesterday
we're fucked
we're fucked
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6394
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:11 pm
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
global warming means climate disruption
higher temps means more moisture in air and more weird weather
snow in may is paradoxically consistent with climate change
we could be fucked
higher temps means more moisture in air and more weird weather
snow in may is paradoxically consistent with climate change
we could be fucked
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
For the first time in human history, the concentration of climate-warming carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has passed the milestone level of 400 parts per million (ppm). The last time so much greenhouse gas was in the air was several million years ago, when the Arctic was ice-free, savannah spread across the Sahara desert and sea level was up to 40 metres higher than today.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 14137
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:32 am
- Location: GAWD'S Country
- Contact:
Re: hot enough for ya?
Yep. Monsoons and blizzards.dead man walking wrote:global warming means climate disruption
higher temps means more moisture in air and more weird weather
snow in may is paradoxically consistent with climate change
we could be fucked
Re: hot enough for ya?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJWxpdYJ3Oc[/youtube]
This space for let
Re: hot enough for ya?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH0Yxk-C5y0[/youtube]
This space for let
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
U.S. taxpayers paid nearly $100 billion responding to damages caused by last year’s extreme weather events associated with climate change, about $1,100 per taxpayer, according to an analysis by the Natural Resources Defense Council released today.
By paying nearly $100 billion, taxpayers—through the federal government—spent more on climate change cleanup than on education or transportation, the analysis shows.
Further, the burden to pay for climate disruption has shifted away from private insurers and is falling more heavily on America’s taxpayers.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: hot enough for ya?
I had mexican food last night. This morning I took a dump that took three regular and one courtesy flushes to take care of. How many damage did that do to the planet?
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: hot enough for ya?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/enviro ... tists.htmlThere has been a 60 per cent increase in the amount of ocean covered with ice compared to this time last year, they equivalent of almost a million square miles.
In a rebound from 2012's record low an unbroken ice sheet more than half the size of Europe already stretches from the Canadian islands to Russia's northern shores, days before the annual re-freeze is even set to begin.
The Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific has remained blocked by pack-ice all year, forcing some ships to change their routes.
A leaked report to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) seen by the Mail on Sunday, has led some scientists to claim that the world is heading for a period of cooling that will not end until the middle of this century.
If correct, it would contradict computer forecasts of imminent catastrophic warming. The news comes several years after it was predicted that the arctic would be ice-free by 2013.
Friedmanesque
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... -delusionsArctic sea ice delusions strike the Mail on Sunday and Telegraph
Both UK periodicals focus on short-term noise and ignore the rapid long-term Arctic sea ice death spiral
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: hot enough for ya?
Yet they misrepresent the skeptics point of view with their graphs...dead man walking wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... -delusionsArctic sea ice delusions strike the Mail on Sunday and Telegraph
Both UK periodicals focus on short-term noise and ignore the rapid long-term Arctic sea ice death spiral
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
appreciate your taking the time to read it
the graphs are interesting
i won't argue with your observation about the authors' use them
the graphs are interesting
i won't argue with your observation about the authors' use them
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: hot enough for ya?
Since when has 40 years been considered long term climatologically?
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
-
- Lifetime IGer
- Posts: 21247
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
- Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan
Re: hot enough for ya?
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
-
- Starship Trooper
- Posts: 7670
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:58 am
- Location: Pumping Elizebeth Shue's Ass!
Re: hot enough for ya?
I find it funny that the global warming crowd's only answer to global warming is the failed policies of socialism and central state planning. I also find it funny that they have to resort to ministry of truth type purging of the historical record and out right fabrication of evidence to advance their agenda.
It's like they have some other goal than stopping global warming?
It's like they have some other goal than stopping global warming?
Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is the distinction of the free man from the slave.
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.

I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.

-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:26 am
Re: hot enough for ya?
I don't agree with you.. I think we must concentrate on solar and wind forms of energy.. Yes efficiency is very low but still it is clean and have lots of scope.Gene wrote:http://www.dailytech.com/Researcher+Bas ... e10973.htmMiklós Zágoni isn't just a physicist and environmental researcher. He is also a global warming activist and Hungary's most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol. Or was.
That was until he learned the details of a new theory of the greenhouse effect, one that not only gave far more accurate climate predictions here on Earth, but Mars too. The theory was developed by another Hungarian scientist, Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years of experience and a former researcher with NASA's Langley Research Center.
After studying it, Zágoni stopped calling global warming a crisis, and has instead focused on presenting the new theory to other climatologists. The data fit extremely well. "I fell in love," he stated at the International Climate Change Conference this week.
"Runaway greenhouse theories contradict energy balance equations," Miskolczi states. Just as the theory of relativity sets an upper limit on velocity, his theory sets an upper limit on the greenhouse effect, a limit which prevents it from warming the Earth more than a certain amount.
How did modern researchers make such a mistake? They relied upon equations derived over 80 years ago, equations which left off one term from the final solution.
Miskolczi's story reads like a book. Looking at a series of differential equations for the greenhouse effect, he noticed the solution -- originally done in 1922 by Arthur Milne, but still used by climate researchers today -- ignored boundary conditions by assuming an "infinitely thick" atmosphere. Similar assumptions are common when solving differential equations; they simplify the calculations and often result in a result that still very closely matches reality. But not always.
This is an interesting article. Doesn't talk about Polar Bears, Glaciers and the heart break of psoriasis. Just some explanations and some tough assed equations.
Climate Disaster boosters claim to have "refuted" the man's work, probably to keep those Grants and Fellowships going. Zagoni sticks to his guns.
I don't work in the field. Maybe the Climate Hysterics are right. Maybe they're not right. They won't act like Scientists and put their data on there.
As Richard Feynmann said - "You have to show why your theory won't work as well as why it will work.". Isn't any great shakes - tell the whole truth.
Fuck - I'm still waiting for someone to figure out how stupid it is to measure carbon dioxide on top of an active volcano. Another amateur stunt by a bunch of paid hacks.
PS
The irony is that I agree that relying upon Fossil fuels is stupid. They're called "Fossil" because they're not being made any more. Sooner or later we're going to get into a major shooting war with China or India over oil.
Where I "get off the bus" is relying upon Windmills and Solar Cells - both are Mental Masturbation.
We need Thorium Cycle nukes and Fusion. Both have been proven to work, especially liquid Thorium reactors. The US Government dumped Thorium reactors because they wanted to subsidize weapons production by using civilian power plants to sustain mining and enrichment. Thorium breeds U-233 which burns fine and will breed more U-233 from Thorium. Thorium is five times more common than Uranium, is found in many places. Geothermal energy is derived from decay of radioactives including Thorium.
It'll hold until fusion reactors become more practical.
Too bad that guys like DMW don't want to sustain civilization. They want to run things.
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
http://www.skepticalscience.com/4-Hiros ... rming.htmlOur planet is building up a lot of heat. When scientists add up all the heat warming the oceans, land, atmosphere and melting the ice, they calculate that our planet is accumulating heat at a rate of 2.5x1014 Watts. This is equivalent to 4 Hiroshima bombs worth of heat per second.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.
Re: hot enough for ya?
you've already lost. give up and make up a new reason to control everything. Maybe alien invasion

-
- Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 8034
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Deep in a well
Re: hot enough for ya?


Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
-
- Sgt. Major
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
- Location: 4th largest city in America
Re: hot enough for ya?
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.
-
Topic author - Sergeant Commanding
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm
Re: hot enough for ya?
dr donkey--DrDonkeyLove wrote:
it is still going to be the sixth-lowest ice minimum on record
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.