Gene wrote:nafod wrote:Kenny X wrote:...they'd just figure out another way to kill you and cause collateral damage. FACT.
It's so much easier to catch someone trying to build a bomb (for example). From the moment they start collecting the materials they are breaking the law. With a gun? Guy's a patriot until he starts pulling the trigger.
The Unabomber made how many bombs, Nafod? How many did the Weathermen make? You gotta get caught first. How many bombs did you make as a kid? Who didn't do it as a kid?
If you're a convicted felon, juvenile or have a Class Firearm 3 you're going to be doing time.
Firearms are still bush league in mass killings. Baruch Goldstein only managed to kill 29 people with his issue Galil and hand grenades at the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre.
The biggest mass murder in US history by a single individual was done with some chain and a can of gasoline. 87 Dead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Land_fire
Biggest school massacre was the Bath Michigan killings. The clown used dynamite which he packed under the school.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_School_disaster
Want to cut murders? End the War on Drugs.
We don't need any more gun control. We need less bullshit and less excuses for fucked up humans.
I agree with your argument for ending the war on drugs. Denver and Colorado has shown a remarkable decrease in violent crime, for example. Stoners aren't shooters.
But your old "just as easy to kill someone with a bomb" bullshit, well, that's just bullshit. The Happy Land guy got lucky because it was a social club and there were no available fire exits or sprinklers or etc., ala Rhode Island nightclub fire. Kind of embarassing for a mass murderer when a tier 2 rock band can kill more with their pyrotechnic display.
For every one of those, how many are there where the prospective 87 victims just walk out the door wet from the sprinklers? How many other targets for arson are that soft to the point of being illegally soft? Probably a few sweatshops here and there, but certainly no Naval Sea Systems Command buildings or elementary schools.
How many months of planning did it take for the Bath School guy to pull off his shit? Ten months.
How much access did he have to the attack site in order to plant his upwards of 700 pounds of explosives? He had total access as he worked there as an electrician.
Seven hundred pounds of explosives. That's World Trade Center conspiracy theory levels of explosives he "snuck in".
That's an awful lot of "just-so" events and 10 months of seriously planning in order to pull that off. If he had had easy access to assault rifles and 100 round magazines you don't think he'd have skipped those 10 months and just got down to it?
With a bombing, you can fuck it up designing it and getting it wrong, building it and getting caught because you are breaking the law, killing yourself accidentally while assembling it (happens all the time), getting caught placing it, having it not go off, or having it go off but the victims aren't there. Low probability of success, although chance for great glory.
With a couple of assault rifles and and some magazines, sure you may not achieve Bath School levels of glory, but unless all your weapons jam, those elementary school children, government employees, church patrons, or couples out on their movie night are going down. Period. You get to pick the time and the place. Act while the rage is hot if you feel like it. Minimal prep required. Smaller numbers but guaranteed numbers.
The market has spoken. Guns, it is.