Presidential Election 2016 (was "Debates")

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux


dead man walking
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6797
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by dead man walking »

clinton's supporters--women, blacks, latinos, queers and trannies--aren't impressed with white male fault-finding.

the gang here is yesterday's news. get used to it.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.

User avatar

johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7901
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by johno »

^ That's an argument for Hillary? The nation is doomed.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats


dead man walking
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6797
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by dead man walking »

hey johno,

i'm not sure which i my two posts leads you to conclude the nation is doomed.

the majority is unwilling to put the country in the hands of donnie and his band of choleric, superstitious supporters. the election is decided. the discussion now is the post-mortem.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Turdacious »

syaigh wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
syaigh wrote:He lacks experience, he has no discernible plan, letting him loose on our economy abd foreign policy would be like setting a fox lose in the hen house. If the fox was a dumb asshole.
That was pretty much the assessment on JFK too FWIW.
And wasn't he only president for like a year and a half?
Enough time to get serially bent over by the Russians (probably not the endorsement the Putin lovin' Donald was looking for).
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Turdacious »

dead man walking wrote:for all the bullshit about sex and walls and emails, it looks like this election is splitting along r & d lines, with a lot of unenthusiastic d's, and the r's losing people because of trump's racism, misogyny, and all-purpose craziness. he's a parody of a white alpha male, but white males seem drawn to his barking.

the dems may have fucked up, but the r's fucked up bigly, so bigly, so stupid, retarded, the bigliest. small hands and a fox pelt. such a loser.
Keep in mind that he's spent most of his career as a NYC Democrat. It's possible that he's no more a Republican than Bernie was a Democrat. Why Dems were so comfortable with the Donald in their tent is as big a question as why Republicans are comfortable with him in theirs.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

nafod
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 12781
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: Looking in your window

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by nafod »

Turdacious wrote:
dead man walking wrote:for all the bullshit about sex and walls and emails, it looks like this election is splitting along r & d lines, with a lot of unenthusiastic d's, and the r's losing people because of trump's racism, misogyny, and all-purpose craziness. he's a parody of a white alpha male, but white males seem drawn to his barking.

the dems may have fucked up, but the r's fucked up bigly, so bigly, so stupid, retarded, the bigliest. small hands and a fox pelt. such a loser.
Keep in mind that he's spent most of his career as a NYC Democrat. It's possible that he's no more a Republican than Bernie was a Democrat. Why Dems were so comfortable with the Donald in their tent is as big a question as why Republicans are comfortable with him in theirs.
The people already in the tent, and who owned the tent, were more than glad to see the new voters in the tent but less than glad to see who brought them to the tent. On both sides.

I liked this quote I heard, the establishment takes Trump literally and so not seriously, while his supporters take him seriously but not literally.

His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Don’t believe everything you think.

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Turdacious »

nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results. If the election's close (like 1960) that's one thing. If he can't cross the Alf Landon line that's another.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule


dead man walking
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6797
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by dead man walking »

he's not getting votes from nasty women and bad hombres. he's shunk the tent with his mean-spirited and undisciplined gob.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.

User avatar

nafod
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 12781
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: Looking in your window

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by nafod »

Turdacious wrote:
nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results.
No it doesn't.

If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Don’t believe everything you think.

User avatar

Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11367
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Grandpa's Spells »

nafod wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results.
No it doesn't.

If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Yeah, there's no spinning that one, as hard as his surrogates tried. WSJ front page got it right.

What the fuck happened to Rudy Giuliani. From America's mayor to Trump's min pin.
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

User avatar

powerlifter54
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7976
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:46 pm
Location: TX

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by powerlifter54 »

nafod wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results.
No it doesn't.

If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.
"Start slowly, then ease off". Tortuga Golden Striders Running Club, Pensacola 1984.

"But even snake wrestling beats life in the cube, for me at least. In measured doses."-Lex

User avatar

johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7901
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by johno »

powerlifter54 wrote:
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.
How dare you, Sir! Democrats rose up in unanimous opposition to Gore's shameful challenge.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats


JohnDoe
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 293
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 6:35 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by JohnDoe »

powerlifter54 wrote:
nafod wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results.
No it doesn't.

If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.
Asking for a recount in an exceptionally close election is a difference of kind, not degree, between Gore and Trump. Florida law mandated a recount because the margin was so close, not because Gore was a narcissistic blowhard who convinced himself, despite all evidence to the contrary, that he is a winner.

User avatar

johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7901
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by johno »

JohnDoe wrote: Asking for a recount in an exceptionally close election is a difference of kind, not degree, between Gore and Trump. Florida law mandated a recount because the margin was so close, not because Gore was a narcissistic blowhard who convinced himself, despite all evidence to the contrary, that he is a winner.
Gore conceded. Then unconceded and contested. No High Road for the Dems on a prompt & peaceful transition.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats


dead man walking
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 6797
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:34 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by dead man walking »

he'd have won the emmy if the vote wasn't rigged.
Really Big Strong Guy: There are a plethora of psychopaths among us.

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

powerlifter54 wrote:
nafod wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results.
No it doesn't.

If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.
You can relitigate the past all you want. There is a chasm of difference between deeming election "rigged" in advance & challenging 271-266 result, razor-thin Florida numbers.

Even you can't be so dense as to argue otherwise.

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

TerryB wrote:How come I never see Hillary supporters posting about her accomplishments or tangible leadership achievements?
There are Hillary supporters on IGX? Big if true.

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

johno wrote:
Yes I Have Balls wrote:
johno wrote:It's not sexual assault if you...don't object [at the time].
That didn't take long. You perverted mother fucker. You are actually DEFENDING a man accused by 10+ women of sexual assault. Man, I have new respect to the absolute depths you will sink. You victim-shaming piece of shit.
^ Not what I said.
It is what you said. Own it!

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

johno wrote:
Yes I Have Balls wrote:This makes me so curious as to what the search history of your porn is. Gotta be fucking brutal.
I will only say this: "Your Mom is a thoroughbred, Kid."
Yes she is insatiable. I just rolled off her and and am untying your dad for his next dicking. He cries too much though.

User avatar

nafod
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 12781
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: Looking in your window

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by nafod »

powerlifter54 wrote:
nafod wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results.
No it doesn't.

If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.
I missed the part where Al Gore called for pitchforks in the streets. I am sure some Dems were ready, as deplorables come in all political affiliations.

There is a process, the process was followed, the Supreme Court tossed it to GWB, Gore gracefully conceded. It is the case study in peaceful transfer of power.

That was *not* what Trump was talking about.
Don’t believe everything you think.

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

Trump just now: "I promise and pledge to totally accept the results of this historic election ... If I win." See? Gore & Trump = same same.

User avatar

johno
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7901
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:36 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by johno »

nafod wrote: That was *not* what Trump was talking about.
You have no idea what Trump was talking about. That's not how he rolls.
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

W.B. Yeats

User avatar

DrDonkeyLove
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8034
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 4:04 am
Location: Deep in a well

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by DrDonkeyLove »

nafod wrote:
powerlifter54 wrote:
nafod wrote:
Turdacious wrote:
nafod wrote:His refusal to accept the election results and therefore the will of the people... [-X
Depends on the results.
No it doesn't.

If at the end of the day the election is certified, it is by definition the will of the people. It's worked for 240 years, through multiple wars and some pretty nasty elections. Fuck Donald Trump.
Yeah that whole AlGore nonsense. Hard to believe anybody would question an election.
I missed the part where Al Gore called for pitchforks in the streets. I am sure some Dems were ready, as deplorables come in all political affiliations.

There is a process, the process was followed, the Supreme Court tossed it to GWB, Gore gracefully conceded. It is the case study in peaceful transfer of power.

That was *not* what Trump was talking about.
The Dems used the SC toss to Bush as a lever to delegitimize his presidency from day 1 until today. Should Trump lose a very tight race, his supporters will do the same thing to Clinton.

And, regarding "rigging", the plans are in place across the nation. Dems excel at voter fraud today as they always have and certain amongst them can't help themselves. Let's hope it's not so close that their rigging matters.

I have a prediction. Should it be a very close win by Trump, Dem hacks across the nation will unleash an unholy scream and swarms of lawyers to fight the "will of the people". The MSM will do a reverse take on "rigging" that's so swift it could cause spinal damage.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party

User avatar

nafod
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 12781
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Location: Looking in your window

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by nafod »

johno wrote:
nafod wrote: That was *not* what Trump was talking about.
You have no idea what Trump was talking about.
That happens a lot. #-o

I do know what he wasn't talking about, though.
Don’t believe everything you think.

User avatar

Grandpa's Spells
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 11367
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:08 pm

Re: Presidential Debates

Post by Grandpa's Spells »

DrDonkeyLove wrote:The Dems used the SC toss to Bush as a lever to delegitimize his presidency from day 1 until today.
You're forgetful or crazy. Bush got bipartisan support on his agenda even before 9/11. Right out of the gate he got Dem votes for his tax cuts.
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.

Post Reply