The couch thread

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Fish
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Fish »

This is by far one of the most intelligent and thought out posts I have ever read over on their forums:
I find it odd that so many people seem to take this moral highground concerning steroid use. For the record, I don't take steroids [would be pretty obvious to tell if you saw me...] but I have no problem with someone who does.

Why shouldn't people be allowed to use steroids?

To the best of my knowledge (someone please correct me if I'm wrong), steroids just reduce your down time so you can train again sooner, i.e. you don't become a beast by simply using steroids and sitting on the couch, you do in fact have to train twice as much (or whatever the factor is).

This competition is completely arbitrary in terms of how we measure performance - of course I appreciate the line has to be drawn somewhere e.g. chest to bar on pullups; I just would have expected CF to also appreciate that using 'enhancements'/drug testing is completely arbitrary as well.

If someone can set a world record, say, in the C&J by using steroids as a supplement in his training regime, who is anyone to say that's not legitimate? Why is achieving a world record without steroid use inherently 'better' than if one did - surely when we measure human performance we're trying to be objective. Do we care, purely for the purposes of measurement, how someone achieved that record? Would you call someone who wore weightlifting shoes and a belt or took fish oil everyday a cheater? Thus why would you call someone who took steroids a cheater?

I don't know what the specific long term health detriments are, but one could go so far as to say the person who is willing to sacrifice their long term health for world class performance is more deserving of the rewards and glory competing at that level brings than someone who isn't.
There was no arguments put up against it. The sheeple pretty much pretented it did not even happen.

I almost feel bad for the guy. He seems to be fueled by intelligent thinking and common sense, but now that his shitfit-forum-hymen was just torn he is going to get fucked over repeatedly until he is just fucking stupid in the head.


The Ginger Beard Man
Sgt. Major
Posts: 4376
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:27 pm
Location: 4th largest city in America

Re: The couch thread

Post by The Ginger Beard Man »

Fish wrote:This is by far one of the most intelligent and thought out posts I have ever read over on their forums:
I find it odd that so many people seem to take this moral highground concerning steroid use. For the record, I don't take steroids [would be pretty obvious to tell if you saw me...] but I have no problem with someone who does.

Why shouldn't people be allowed to use steroids?

To the best of my knowledge (someone please correct me if I'm wrong), steroids just reduce your down time so you can train again sooner, i.e. you don't become a beast by simply using steroids and sitting on the couch, you do in fact have to train twice as much (or whatever the factor is).

This competition is completely arbitrary in terms of how we measure performance - of course I appreciate the line has to be drawn somewhere e.g. chest to bar on pullups; I just would have expected CF to also appreciate that using 'enhancements'/drug testing is completely arbitrary as well.

If someone can set a world record, say, in the C&J by using steroids as a supplement in his training regime, who is anyone to say that's not legitimate? Why is achieving a world record without steroid use inherently 'better' than if one did - surely when we measure human performance we're trying to be objective. Do we care, purely for the purposes of measurement, how someone achieved that record? Would you call someone who wore weightlifting shoes and a belt or took fish oil everyday a cheater? Thus why would you call someone who took steroids a cheater?

I don't know what the specific long term health detriments are, but one could go so far as to say the person who is willing to sacrifice their long term health for world class performance is more deserving of the rewards and glory competing at that level brings than someone who isn't.
There was no arguments put up against it. The sheeple pretty much pretented it did not even happen.

I almost feel bad for the guy. He seems to be fueled by intelligent thinking and common sense, but now that his shitfit-forum-hymen was just torn he is going to get fucked over repeatedly until he is just fucking stupid in the head.
Or maybe he'll end up posting here.
Blaidd Drwg wrote:Disengage from the outcome and do work.
Jezzy Bell wrote:Use a fucking barbell, pansy.

User avatar

POD
Gunny
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:21 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by POD »

Grim Hamundarson wrote:Or maybe he'll end up posting here.
Who has a sock puppet over there? Someone send him a PM. Hah.


http://games2009.crossfit.com/thegames/ ... sting.html
silverback replied to comment from Doug... June 20, 2009 7:38 AM

[CrossFit is] Not a sport? With that comment you affirm that you have no useful opinion in matters of fitness or sport.

User avatar

Kraj
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3808
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:41 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Kraj »

Fuck steroids. It IS cheating. What is so unclear about that to some people? I don't care if someone uses it to slow aging or to get ripped abs, but if you're using it in competition, you're a fuckin' douche. The whole purpose of sports is honest competition. "May the best man win," not "May the man with the best scientists pumping horse jizz into his veins win."

Roid freaks always use the argument that "Hey, it's not just magic. We still gotta put in the work." That argument is bullshit. The roids let you do shit you could never do clean. By roid-head logic you could swap out your arms for robot arms. Why not? YOU still gotta lift shit with them, right? It's not like the robot arms will just work on their own.
Image

User avatar

Shaun B. O'Murnecan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 8624
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:13 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shaun B. O'Murnecan »

Jezebel Jones wrote:
The Bastard Son of the Shafman wrote:Just somewhat related to this topic is the emergence of Daniel Mays making BOTO's and POD's triumvirate complete.

This was posted on the P&B and is one of the more interesting* posts that's come up lately.

*Interesting as a cry out for a manfucking buddy to plug a hole.
faggotry, blah blah... .
Wow.
LOL! Brilliant. Is Kraj moonlighting?
Image

User avatar

sanchezero
Top
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:51 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by sanchezero »

who said Nicole was over her 'mannish' phase?

http://www.leenks.com/link187020.html

:-k
have you ever been as far as even considered go want to do look more like?
Image

User avatar

Holy Cow
Top
Posts: 1778
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:37 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Holy Cow »

Resident Quack wrote:More from Tate's "special" seminar to @F trainers:
http://media.crossfit.com/cf-video/Cros ... ue2Pre.mov
I like what Tate has to say in that vid. Thanks for posting.

And as always, CrossFitSuxDix.

User avatar

Holy Cow
Top
Posts: 1778
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:37 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Holy Cow »

sanchezero wrote:who said Nicole was over her 'mannish' phase?

http://www.leenks.com/link187020.html

:-k
Image

Would

User avatar

Trebuchet
Top
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 8:24 am
Location: remote

Re: The couch thread

Post by Trebuchet »

Jacop wrote:
sanchezero wrote:who said Nicole was over her 'mannish' phase?

http://www.leenks.com/link187020.html

:-k
Image

Would
Is it the body or the Keith Richards face that does it for you?
http://www.leenks.com/link187020.html
"My resting heart rate is 39 when I don't read posts on the bad forum" - Marty

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: The couch thread

Post by Turdacious »

:vom: :vom: :vom: :vom: :vom:
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

what's her Tran time?
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by TerryB »

Fuck, that shit's painful to read.
DT,

I find your comments distasteful and pretty sad.

Do you have such little faith in this community and the coach & organisation that give you so much for free, that you have to distrust them, their ethics and their methods on a free, open forum organised by them?
The horror!
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

protobuilder wrote:
Fuck, that shit's painful to read.
DT,

I find your comments distasteful and pretty sad.

Do you have such little faith in this community and the coach & organisation that give you so much for free, that you have to distrust them, their ethics and their methods on a free, open forum organised by them?
The horror!

Questions that you know the answers to really don't need to be asked.
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.

User avatar

Holy Cow
Top
Posts: 1778
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:37 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Holy Cow »

Trebuchet wrote:
Jacop wrote:
sanchezero wrote:who said Nicole was over her 'mannish' phase?

http://www.leenks.com/link187020.html

:-k
Image

Would
Is it the body or the Keith Richards face that does it for you?
http://www.leenks.com/link187020.html
Or Iggy

Image


Gin Master
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3024
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Gin Master »

Fitting to post after a picture of Iggy. From the @-blog:
With the temperature rising right now at many CrossFit affiliates, often the desire to wear clothing lessens. Is this a distraction to training or an added benefit of being a member at a CrossFit box? Do the sexy bodies sell CrossFit just as much as the training?

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

A few things.

1. Protesting that @F gives until it hurts is both hilarious and pathetic at the same time. That's the business model and it fucking works like crazy for GG.

2. Just what everyone needs is fucking sweat dripping all over the floor and equipment. I had to tell some football players that they weren't allowed to wear tank tops to the weight room. Sleeveless shirts were fine, but not tanks, because of the bars becoming slippery.

User avatar

Fish
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Fish »

Kraj wrote:Fuck steroids. It IS cheating. What is so unclear about that to some people? I don't care if someone uses it to slow aging or to get ripped abs, but if you're using it in competition, you're a fuckin' douche. The whole purpose of sports is honest competition. "May the best man win," not "May the man with the best scientists pumping horse jizz into his veins win."

Roid freaks always use the argument that "Hey, it's not just magic. We still gotta put in the work." That argument is bullshit. The roids let you do shit you could never do clean. By roid-head logic you could swap out your arms for robot arms. Why not? YOU still gotta lift shit with them, right? It's not like the robot arms will just work on their own.
I don't think anyone really said that steroids are not cheating. If an organization bans steroid use, then it is cheating. The fact that these organizations banned steroids in the first place is questionable. There have never been any studies relating moderate steroid use to long-term health problems, though the media tries to portray them as horrible things that will give you roid rage and make your balls shrink. While those things can happen, it is not a direct result from usage, rather the results of taking hormones improperly (ie- too long of cycle or too much of the drug).

The US government arbitrarily decided to make possessing or selling steroids a federal offense, when there are far worse things they could be worrying about. If an organization decides to ban the use of steroids, fine. But the arguments given for doing so are not without holes.

User avatar

tough old man
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Hell

Re: The couch thread

Post by tough old man »

http://games2009.crossfit.com/thegames/ ... sting.html

Quote:
silverback replied to comment from Doug... June 20, 2009 7:38 AM

[CrossFit is] Not a sport? With that comment you affirm that you have no useful opinion in matters of fitness or sport.
He hurt my feelings [-( All I said was crossfit wasnt a sport its a workout and not a particularly good one at that. Touchy little bitches arent they?
"I am the author of my own misfortune, I don't need a ghost writer" - Ian Dury


"Legio mihi nomen est, quia multi sumus."


Gin Master
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3024
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Gin Master »

This post captures the essence of @F blog discussions well. It contains some Couch-worship, acknowledgment of others' viewpoints followed by some non sequiter, attempts at pompous writing style, a confusing slew of mixed metaphors, and some general @F rim jobbing. And, of course, it is utterly pointless.

:rolleyes:
Kam wrote...

June 20, 2009 2:32 PM

Well,
Coach did say that the workouts wouldn't be anything that anyone is familiar with.

Wod 1: Sudden Death "Peeing for Time" definitley fits that category...

DT, Bingo, and anyone else who is activley contributing to these discussions. I think most of you all have legitimate points on alot of levels. The most important message IMHO though is that it's a step in the right direction for a fledgling sport and an established community.

Reputation (for individuals within) (Coach if you're reading this I know you give the two fingered salute to the institution ;)), Integrity and for one of a better word - Virtuosity is a cornerstone of the crossfit microcosm. Taking a pragmatic approach - An excellent point was raised on the mainpage discussion log: We are data points. When you have a sample size there is always a distribution within the population - Lets just hope there isnt too fat a tail.

Good luck to all of the competitors. I sincerely hope you dont get a genuine injury or sickness leading up to the games because it sounds like the massess are going to "get medieval on your ass*" if you do..

- Kam

User avatar

GoDogGo!
IGX Honorary Lesbian
Posts: 11208
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:10 am
Location: Casa de Culo

Re: The couch thread

Post by GoDogGo! »

Let me touch that up just a bit:
Fish wrote: The US government arbitrarily decided to make possessing or selling recreational drugs a federal offense, when there are far worse things they could be worrying about.
The flesh is weak, and the smell of pussy is strong like a muthafucka.

User avatar

Alfred_E._Neuman
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 5058
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:13 am
Location: The Usual Gang of Idiots

Re: The couch thread

Post by Alfred_E._Neuman »

Gin Master wrote:
Kam wrote...

June 20, 2009 2:32 PM

Reputation (for individuals within) (Coach if you're reading this I know you give the two fingered salute to the institution ;)), Integrity and for one of a better word - Virtuosity is a cornerstone of the crossfit microcosm. Taking a pragmatic approach - An excellent point was raised on the mainpage discussion log: We are data points. When you have a sample size there is always a distribution within the population - Lets just hope there isnt too fat a tail.

- Kam
My head asplode.

That "paragraph" is like sitting in on the worst corporate meeting in history. You'd fill up your Buzzword Bingo card in about a second. Image
I don't have a lot of experience with vampires, but I have hunted werewolves. I shot one once, but by the time I got to it, it had turned back into my neighbor's dog.


Gin Master
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3024
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Gin Master »

Alfred_E._Neuman wrote:
Gin Master wrote:
Kam wrote...

June 20, 2009 2:32 PM

Reputation (for individuals within) (Coach if you're reading this I know you give the two fingered salute to the institution ;)), Integrity and for one of a better word - Virtuosity is a cornerstone of the crossfit microcosm. Taking a pragmatic approach - An excellent point was raised on the mainpage discussion log: We are data points. When you have a sample size there is always a distribution within the population - Lets just hope there isnt too fat a tail.

- Kam
My head asplode.

That "paragraph" is like sitting in on the worst corporate meeting in history. You'd fill up your Buzzword Bingo card in about a second. Image
I'm still not sure what it even says. But your smiley is righteous. It puts old rolly eyes to shame.


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by TerryB »

Virtuosity is a cornerstone of the crossfit microcosm
I musta missed that part?
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image


Gin Master
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3024
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:41 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Gin Master »

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Virtuosity is a cornerstone of the crossfit microcosm
Of course, the 20% slop stone is right next to it.

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

Gin Master wrote:
Alfred_E._Neuman wrote:
Gin Master wrote:
Kam wrote...

June 20, 2009 2:32 PM

Reputation (for individuals within) (Coach if you're reading this I know you give the two fingered salute to the institution ;)), Integrity and for one of a better word - Virtuosity is a cornerstone of the crossfit microcosm. Taking a pragmatic approach - An excellent point was raised on the mainpage discussion log: We are data points. When you have a sample size there is always a distribution within the population - Lets just hope there isnt too fat a tail.

- Kam
My head asplode.

That "paragraph" is like sitting in on the worst corporate meeting in history. You'd fill up your Buzzword Bingo card in about a second. Image
I'm still not sure what it even says. But your smiley is righteous. It puts old rolly eyes to shame.
This is a lot like how geocentricism eventually died, and heliocentrism became accepted:the observable evidence obviously completely disproved the official theory (sun revolves around the earth/@fit builds elite fitness, take your pick), so those the church/koolaid drinkers had to come up with increasingly more bizarre mental gymnastics (epicycles/modal domains, or whatever), building a mountain of bullshit one specious "proof" at a time, until eventually the whole construct collapses under it's own weight of self-serving absurdity, and everyone has to admit that Coppernicus/IGx was right all along.
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.

Post Reply