Batboy2/75 wrote:A parasitic subculture fed by hand wringing white yuppies.
I started up a roiling argument on another forum, the topic being on what term you would use to describe someone who makes "good" decisions based on race, such as offering extra tutoring based on skin color. This, being that of course you could not call them racist, since racism is bad and they are only doing good.
Never got an answer. It is a word that does not exist.
I see the n-word-users and something-for-nothingers as two sides of the same coin. Different methods working to the same effect.
Batboy2/75 wrote:
Then sometime in the 1990s (just a guess. It could have been in the 2000s) the hand wringing faggot liberals decided that this arrangement was too cruel. Bubba and Tamyrae or Tyrel and Teniqua (take your pick) we're to embarrassed buying; rice, beans,cheese and milk at the local Piggly Wiggly with Monoply Money. No, we had to give them Debt Cards. This way they could pretend to they were just like the hard working normal folks that actually earned the money they spent on food. No need to feel ashamed, Uncle Sugar said so.
Then that wasn't enough. Why limit those EBT Cards to just staples. Even generously defined staples. No, we need to let the only obese poor people (as a group) on the planet buy racks of Coca Cola and hot pockets. Things have gotten so out of hand, that a couple of years ago EBT cards were being used at local CA Indian Casinos.
It's hilarious that you automatically place the blame for this on them dirty lib'ruls and nigruhs, rather than large grocery chains who stand to profit from ease of use of food stamps and widening the selection of possible purchases.
Batboy2/75 wrote:
Then sometime in the 1990s (just a guess. It could have been in the 2000s) the hand wringing faggot liberals decided that this arrangement was too cruel. Bubba and Tamyrae or Tyrel and Teniqua (take your pick) we're to embarrassed buying; rice, beans,cheese and milk at the local Piggly Wiggly with Monoply Money. No, we had to give them Debt Cards. This way they could pretend to they were just like the hard working normal folks that actually earned the money they spent on food. No need to feel ashamed, Uncle Sugar said so.
Then that wasn't enough. Why limit those EBT Cards to just staples. Even generously defined staples. No, we need to let the only obese poor people (as a group) on the planet buy racks of Coca Cola and hot pockets. Things have gotten so out of hand, that a couple of years ago EBT cards were being used at local CA Indian Casinos.
It's hilarious that you automatically place the blame for this on them dirty lib'ruls and nigruhs, rather than large grocery chains who stand to profit from ease of use of food stamps and widening the selection of possible purchases.
The big rise in spending was when a certain party was in power (the projections are most likely wrong FWIW-- they don't take into account the new farm bill).
Turdacious wrote:The big rise in spending was when a certain party was in power (the projections are most likely wrong FWIW-- they don't take into account the new farm bill).
I didn't offer analysis - I laughed at Batboy jumping at his standard bogeymen of liberals and coloreds and assigning motives to actions when he can't even pinpoint when food stamps actually stopped being stamps. He doesn't make an argument, he assigns blame to strawmen.
Jezzy Bell wrote:The subtext of all the wordy pro n word posts is thus: racism is easy and it feels good to be superior.
The root of much evil.
Mao wrote:Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party
Turdacious wrote:The big rise in spending was when a certain party was in power (the projections are most likely wrong FWIW-- they don't take into account the new farm bill).
I didn't offer analysis - I laughed at Batboy jumping at his standard bogeymen of liberals and coloreds and assigning motives to actions when he can't even pinpoint when food stamps actually stopped being stamps. He doesn't make an argument, he assigns blame to strawmen.
You really don't understand the Democratic constituency at all.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule
Batboy2/75 wrote:
Then sometime in the 1990s (just a guess. It could have been in the 2000s) the hand wringing faggot liberals decided that this arrangement was too cruel. Bubba and Tamyrae or Tyrel and Teniqua (take your pick) we're to embarrassed buying; rice, beans,cheese and milk at the local Piggly Wiggly with Monoply Money. No, we had to give them Debt Cards. This way they could pretend to they were just like the hard working normal folks that actually earned the money they spent on food. No need to feel ashamed, Uncle Sugar said so.
Then that wasn't enough. Why limit those EBT Cards to just staples. Even generously defined staples. No, we need to let the only obese poor people (as a group) on the planet buy racks of Coca Cola and hot pockets. Things have gotten so out of hand, that a couple of years ago EBT cards were being used at local CA Indian Casinos.
It's hilarious that you automatically place the blame for this on them dirty lib'ruls and nigruhs, rather than large grocery chains who stand to profit from ease of use of food stamps and widening the selection of possible purchases.
I prefer skip the semantics and just blame those that are actually in control legislation and are to blame for the current mess.
Nor do I get caught up in racial boogy men. Nowhere did I blame niggras, negros, niggers, etc. I blame those those embrace a ghetto get-over culture that doesn't value family, hard work, civic virtue, education, or self reliance. I could care less about race. To me, culture is king.
Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms is the distinction of the free man from the slave.
DARTH wrote:Then you miss the point that many of us make a distinction between a black person and a n-.
I have no issue with a black person describing a truly racist white person as a cracker, honky or white trash low life.
Humans use describing words and for those who I call n-, it fits them well. Jerk and asshole don't cut it, too broad and all of us can be jerks and assholes.
DARTH wrote:
Because although I think what a n- means now CAN be applied to whites, it does describe a certain type of black trash. So when you say n-, you know what we are talking about.
The Cunning Stunt wrote:
ImUndaYourBed wrote:You say only a "n-" would do that, but wouldn't a "psycho" do that? Or a "sociopath"?
N- is preferable because he's a n-. Psycho, sociopath, we're not psychiatrists. N- is preferable because it just sums it up more details in one neat package.
Dr. Agkistrodon wrote:Me personally, I choose to describe a man -regardless of his color- who beats a woman in front of a child as a n- because "asshole" just doesn't carry as much weight.
Yeah right, bunch of hypocrites.
I went back and looked at the threads in IGX on:
- Boston Marathon Bombings
- Aurora CO Shooting
- Sandy Hook Shooting
And never once was the perpetrator called a N-. The word N- was brought up on those threads, but it had nothing to do with the perpetrator, and one could argue that those acts were as bad if not worse than beating a wife.
As for me personally I don't use profanity at all.
There are definitely problems with various groups in the US, but justifying your use of a word does nothing to fix that problem.
DARTH wrote:Then you miss the point that many of us make a distinction between a black person and a n-.
I have no issue with a black person describing a truly racist white person as a cracker, honky or white trash low life.
Humans use describing words and for those who I call n-, it fits them well. Jerk and asshole don't cut it, too broad and all of us can be jerks and assholes.
DARTH wrote:
Because although I think what a n- means now CAN be applied to whites, it does describe a certain type of black trash. So when you say n-, you know what we are talking about.
The Cunning Stunt wrote:
ImUndaYourBed wrote:You say only a "n-" would do that, but wouldn't a "psycho" do that? Or a "sociopath"?
N- is preferable because he's a n-. Psycho, sociopath, we're not psychiatrists. N- is preferable because it just sums it up more details in one neat package.
Dr. Agkistrodon wrote:Me personally, I choose to describe a man -regardless of his color- who beats a woman in front of a child as a n- because "asshole" just doesn't carry as much weight.
Yeah right, bunch of hypocrites.
I went back and looked at the threads in IGX on:
- Boston Marathon Bombings
- Aurora CO Shooting
- Sandy Hook Shooting
And never once was the perpetrator called a N-. The word N- was brought up on those threads, but it had nothing to do with the perpetrator, and one could argue that those acts were as bad if not worse than beating a wife.
As for me personally I don't use profanity at all.
There are definitely problems with various groups in the US, but justifying your use of a word does nothing to fix that problem.
Well ain't you the goody two shoes!
Obama's narcissism and arrogance is only superseded by his naivete and stupidity.
I use the word to describe various folk of African descent (read: touched by the tar brush) for whom I have no use and/or outright dislike. Many will take this as a confession that "I hate all black people". Not the case, but people will believe what they want.
I'm an equal opportunity hater. I have applied the n-word to low class white trash, but I usually include the caveat of "that ain't nothin' but a white nigger" or some such equally classy comment that sends my wife into orbit. The n-word bothers her and she really doesn't like the fact that I use it perhaps too liberally in regard to the Canannite horde, but she will throw it out there at a drop of a hat when confronted by darkies who blame their ills on white privilege or resort to damning comments about whites in general. I don't think this makes her a hypocrite as much as she's just the type who doesn't reveal her true feelings until under pressure.
I give no end of shit to whites who fail to measure up to the high standards I expect from our once noble and conquering race. For them, I might label as white trash, redneck assholes, hillbillies, cracker asses, coon asses, etc, depending on what mood I'm in. I'm puzzled as to why the hand wringing liberals don't come out with guns ablaze against these racially charged epithets. I probably would get a knowing nod, hearty chuckle, or confirming "atta boy" from the aforementioned worry warts. Nobody hates white people more than white people.
I generally don't have a problem with the Latino brethren, and am really not concerned about their northern migration. Honestly, I see them working jobs that whites and blacks no longer want, and the family values (Catholic influence?) certainly seems to be there. I see Messican families all the time out in public, and the only time I see the men without the women is usually a work crew out for lunch. Contrast with the darkies whose public face seems to either be a large group of males loitering or looking for trouble, or a gaggle of obnoxious females with their bastard chillens in tow. A middle class black couple under the age of 60 who are obviously married and together is such a rare sight in these parts that it will actually cause me to take a second glance and subconsciously nod in approval. So, if this once great nation goes to the beaners...so be it, as they will likely carry on some semblence of the concepts and traditions that this country was founded on. If it goes to the darkies...nuke from orbit, plz.
The couple next door to us are the type of fundamentalist Xtian assholes who are trying to buy their way into heaven, and have committed the almost unforgiveable sin of adopting two Ukrainian orphans. These little troublesome asswipes were plucked from the streets where they were dumped by their drug addled prostitute mother. But for the love of Sweet Jesus they would have remained, but were rescued and relocated right next door to me in the holy pastures of Mississippi thanks to their smiling and praying adoptive parents. I call them "the gypsies" much to my wife's chagrin. I think their names are Bogdan and Roma, or some such gypsie monikers, but I have given up trying to remember their names and how to pronounce that shit...I now refer to them as Foghorn and Homo.
Why do I report all this...I don't know. Don't take my nigger ramblings too harshly, maybe. I've got nothing but love for folks who share my same values and way of life. If you have 5 kids by any of 7 different men (the tests were inconclusive), you've never been married, no one in your family has held a job since before Lincoln was in office, and your highest aspiration is to get on permanent disability...you're a nigger and I've got no qualms calling you that.
Kazuya Mishima wrote:
I generally don't have a problem with the Latino brethren, and am really not concerned about their northern migration. Honestly, I see them working jobs that whites and blacks no longer want, and the family values (Catholic influence?) certainly seems to be there. I see Messican families all the time out in public, and the only time I see the men without the women is usually a work crew out for lunch. Contrast with the darkies whose public face seems to either be a large group of males loitering or looking for trouble, or a gaggle of obnoxious females with their bastard chillens in tow. A middle class black couple under the age of 60 who are obviously married and together is such a rare sight in these parts that it will actually cause me to take a second glance and subconsciously nod in approval. So, if this once great nation goes to the beaners...so be it, as they will likely carry on some semblence of the concepts and traditions that this country was founded on. If it goes to the darkies...nuke from orbit, plz.
I guess that I have not seen the huge downside to the increasing Latino population either (so long as English remains an expectation). Most that I see bust ass all day and a family oriented to a fault.
"He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that." JS Mill
The littlest one will take a white onion as big as Dolly Parton's left teat and eat the damned thing like an apple while doing backflips on our trampoline.
DARTH wrote:Then you miss the point that many of us make a distinction between a black person and a n-.
I have no issue with a black person describing a truly racist white person as a cracker, honky or white trash low life.
Humans use describing words and for those who I call n-, it fits them well. Jerk and asshole don't cut it, too broad and all of us can be jerks and assholes.
DARTH wrote:
Because although I think what a n- means now CAN be applied to whites, it does describe a certain type of black trash. So when you say n-, you know what we are talking about.
The Cunning Stunt wrote:
ImUndaYourBed wrote:You say only a "n-" would do that, but wouldn't a "psycho" do that? Or a "sociopath"?
N- is preferable because he's a n-. Psycho, sociopath, we're not psychiatrists. N- is preferable because it just sums it up more details in one neat package.
Dr. Agkistrodon wrote:Me personally, I choose to describe a man -regardless of his color- who beats a woman in front of a child as a n- because "asshole" just doesn't carry as much weight.
Yeah right, bunch of hypocrites.
I went back and looked at the threads in IGX on:
- Boston Marathon Bombings
- Aurora CO Shooting
- Sandy Hook Shooting
And never once was the perpetrator called a N-. The word N- was brought up on those threads, but it had nothing to do with the perpetrator, and one could argue that those acts were as bad if not worse than beating a wife.
As for me personally I don't use profanity at all.
There are definitely problems with various groups in the US, but justifying your use of a word does nothing to fix that problem.
Well ain't you the goody two shoes!
People being honest is always better for a problem than acting like it does not exist and social banning (and legislation to make them hate speech) words won;t do anything but make it worse, especially when there is such a prevalent double standard about who can use them and what equality means.
-Boston Marathon Bombings + Whhite Dudes from Russia’s asshole and they did have some niggardly qualities but nigger is a bad describer for them if your trying to draw the picture quick. That's what describers are for.
-Aurora CO Shooter = High IQ White boy, playing Batman, with the Jokers hair. Hardly a good describer. If he was black, dressed like he was a member of the 8th street Gorillaz and yell'd out "Y'all Muthfuckahz gonna Die!" than we'd be using nigger.
-Sandy Hook Shooting = That sick little pussy? Calling him a nigger is a disrespect to niggers. Little bitch white boy?
Cracka please!
"God forbid we tell the savages to go fuck themselves." Batboy
How exactly is the core Dem constituency a non-sequitur?
And since your argument seems to be solely based on semantics:
The 2008 farm bill renamed the Food Stamp Program as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (as of October 2008), and replaced all references to "stamp" or "coupon" in federal law to "card" or "EBT."
It's hard to get offended by the word "nigger" when the supposedly hard ass users of the term keep running back to the Jesuitical Chris Rockish distinction between it and "good black people". And LOL at stretching the term way beyond elastic limitsto apply it to bad white people. You've fucked with the term so that it now just means what you want it to mean. Congratufuckinglations! You've debased the term "nigger" - which used correctly has a powerful punch - to the point that it is as ambiguous and all-emcompassing as "CrossFit"!
This would be amusing but it's taking over the whole fucking site. It's boring, juvenile and despite the liberally applied bleach (pardon the mixed metaphors) the printed word "nigger" stands in stark contrast to the core values of most people who log on to shoot the shit about fitness, politics or life. Myself included.
What troubles me an ickle bit is the fact that Kaz obviously has some class of an education and a job that pays well (I'm guessing he tops out at $150,000 and won't ever go any higher but let's not judge). For Kaz, typing this flowery American History X polemics is just good sport. Type it out and watch the "liberal kwerr overreaction" etc. It's the internet equivalent of having a wank.
But for good old blue collar Drath....old Boxer....the guy who can't afford to bring his kids for a fucking burger....this isn't just sport. This is becoming part of Drath's narrative. This is becoming part of Drath's real life filter....his construct to explain his place in God's universe. And that's sad. Drath, you've posted enough over the years for me to know two things. Firstly, if I was in a fight for my life and you were a passer-by, you'd intervene because you're a good bloke. Secondly, we're going to agree about fuck all on the internet because you're completely under Kaz's spell. Wake the fuck up, shit for brains.
Where this shit ends up is someone hoarding it all away and then "doing something". Like hitting the black guy in the bar that bit TOO HARD. Or saying the word "nigger" in front of someone who fucks up whatever excuse for a career was open to them. However it comes out, rest assured that it ends up as a big, fucking mistake. Not for Kaz! Him (and his wife? I didn't follow that) will say "nigger" only when it suits. For sport. For fun. For calculated impact. It'll be old Drath or some other poor fucker reading this who takes it all to heart and makes the error. Who goes "all in" and buys this putrid shit. They make the cataclysmic cosmic nano-second decision that shitfucks their pathetic life.
There are real enemies and scumbags out there. For example. In 2007 the top 20% of Americans owned 85% of the country's wealth. The bottom 80% owned 7%. Since 2007, the share of total wealth owned by the top 1% of the population grew from 34.6% to 37.1%, and that owned by the top 20% of Americans grew from 85% to 87.7%. Median household wealth fell by 36.1% but we saw a drop of only 11.1% for the top 1%. What the fuck is going on? Is it the niggers, Kaz? What say you, Drath? The niggers taking all that wealth?
Gorbachev wrote:It's hard to get offended by the word "nigger" when the supposedly hard ass users of the term keep running back to the Jesuitical Chris Rockish distinction between it and "good black people". And LOL at stretching the term way beyond elastic limitsto apply it to bad white people. You've fucked with the term so that it now just means what you want it to mean. Congratufuckinglations! You've debased the term "nigger" - which used correctly has a powerful punch - to the point that it is as ambiguous and all-emcompassing as "CrossFit"!
This would be amusing but it's taking over the whole fucking site. It's boring, juvenile and despite the liberally applied bleach (pardon the mixed metaphors) the printed word "nigger" stands in stark contrast to the core values of most people who log on to shoot the shit about fitness, politics or life. Myself included.
What troubles me an ickle bit is the fact that Kaz obviously has some class of an education and a job that pays well (I'm guessing he tops out at $150,000 and won't ever go any higher but let's not judge). For Kaz, typing this flowery American History X polemics is just good sport. Type it out and watch the "liberal kwerr overreaction" etc. It's the internet equivalent of having a wank.
But for good old blue collar Drath....old Boxer....the guy who can't afford to bring his kids for a fucking burger....this isn't just sport. This is becoming part of Drath's narrative. This is becoming part of Drath's real life filter....his construct to explain his place in God's universe. And that's sad. Drath, you've posted enough over the years for me to know two things. Firstly, if I was in a fight for my life and you were a passer-by, you'd intervene because you're a good bloke. Secondly, we're going to agree about fuck all on the internet because you're completely under Kaz's spell. Wake the fuck up, shit for brains.
Where this shit ends up is someone hoarding it all away and then "doing something". Like hitting the black guy in the bar that bit TOO HARD. Or saying the word "nigger" in front of someone who fucks up whatever excuse for a career was open to them. However it comes out, rest assured that it ends up as a big, fucking mistake. Not for Kaz! Him (and his wife? I didn't follow that) will say "nigger" only when it suits. For sport. For fun. For calculated impact. It'll be old Drath or some other poor fucker reading this who takes it all to heart and makes the error. Who goes "all in" and buys this putrid shit. They make the cataclysmic cosmic nano-second decision that shitfucks their pathetic life.
There are real enemies and scumbags out there. For example. In 2007 the top 20% of Americans owned 85% of the country's wealth. The bottom 80% owned 7%. Since 2007, the share of total wealth owned by the top 1% of the population grew from 34.6% to 37.1%, and that owned by the top 20% of Americans grew from 85% to 87.7%. Median household wealth fell by 36.1% but we saw a drop of only 11.1% for the top 1%. What the fuck is going on? Is it the niggers, Kaz? What say you, Drath? The niggers taking all that wealth?
Fucking bores.
BTW, it's spelled "boors", but otherwise this is some good prose. Seahill wishes he could write like this.
Gorbachev wrote:It's hard to get offended by the word "nigger" when the supposedly hard ass users of the term keep running back to the Jesuitical Chris Rockish distinction between it and "good black people". And LOL at stretching the term way beyond elastic limitsto apply it to bad white people. You've fucked with the term so that it now just means what you want it to mean. Congratufuckinglations! You've debased the term "nigger" - which used correctly has a powerful punch - to the point that it is as ambiguous and all-emcompassing as "CrossFit"!
This would be amusing but it's taking over the whole fucking site. It's boring, juvenile and despite the liberally applied bleach (pardon the mixed metaphors) the printed word "nigger" stands in stark contrast to the core values of most people who log on to shoot the shit about fitness, politics or life. Myself included.
What troubles me an ickle bit is the fact that Kaz obviously has some class of an education and a job that pays well (I'm guessing he tops out at $150,000 and won't ever go any higher but let's not judge). For Kaz, typing this flowery American History X polemics is just good sport. Type it out and watch the "liberal kwerr overreaction" etc. It's the internet equivalent of having a wank.
But for good old blue collar Drath....old Boxer....the guy who can't afford to bring his kids for a fucking burger....this isn't just sport. This is becoming part of Drath's narrative. This is becoming part of Drath's real life filter....his construct to explain his place in God's universe. And that's sad. Drath, you've posted enough over the years for me to know two things. Firstly, if I was in a fight for my life and you were a passer-by, you'd intervene because you're a good bloke. Secondly, we're going to agree about fuck all on the internet because you're completely under Kaz's spell. Wake the fuck up, shit for brains.
Where this shit ends up is someone hoarding it all away and then "doing something". Like hitting the black guy in the bar that bit TOO HARD. Or saying the word "nigger" in front of someone who fucks up whatever excuse for a career was open to them. However it comes out, rest assured that it ends up as a big, fucking mistake. Not for Kaz! Him (and his wife? I didn't follow that) will say "nigger" only when it suits. For sport. For fun. For calculated impact. It'll be old Drath or some other poor fucker reading this who takes it all to heart and makes the error. Who goes "all in" and buys this putrid shit. They make the cataclysmic cosmic nano-second decision that shitfucks their pathetic life.
There are real enemies and scumbags out there. For example. In 2007 the top 20% of Americans owned 85% of the country's wealth. The bottom 80% owned 7%. Since 2007, the share of total wealth owned by the top 1% of the population grew from 34.6% to 37.1%, and that owned by the top 20% of Americans grew from 85% to 87.7%. Median household wealth fell by 36.1% but we saw a drop of only 11.1% for the top 1%. What the fuck is going on? Is it the niggers, Kaz? What say you, Drath? The niggers taking all that wealth?
Fucking bores.
BTW, it's spelled "boors", but otherwise this is some good prose. Seahill wishes he could write like this.
No, I meant what I wrote. You both bore the shit out of me, ergo you are fucking bores.
And clappy hands, Kaz? You really are an insecure cunt underneath being a mouthy stupid cunt.
Kazuya Mishima wrote:LOL at your fascination with me, and your amateur hour Hannibal Lector bullshit. Tell me more about myself...please.
Your biggest problem is keeping your temper in check. It's nasty when it comes out. As your wife knows more than most. I'd guess you used to be seen as someone with a real sense of humour when you were younger, but now you're seen as someone who is simply inappropriate and pain. You do ok but can't shake the feeling that you're underachieving. You blame this on the system and tell yourself it's because you refuse to bend the knee. Real problem is your inability to really get on with people. In other words, being a bit of a thick-thick-thicky in the old personal skills department.
Want to know more? Ask your mom. If she's still talking to you.
