"...overflowing with foulmouthed ignorance."
http://www.irongarmx.net/phpbbdev/
--------------------------------nafod wrote:I'd hit it
Are you talking about Jim Fallon?syaigh wrote:Funny thing how she. Claims to have grown up in a non-abusive house but then talks about an apathetic mom and a father who would terrorize most kids. Not that I'm not buying the diagnosis. There's actually a good ted talk by a psychopath who realized he was a psychpath through his work with studying the brains of serial killers.
Or he has not had his "Trigger incident" yet?baffled wrote:Are you talking about Jim Fallon?syaigh wrote:Funny thing how she. Claims to have grown up in a non-abusive house but then talks about an apathetic mom and a father who would terrorize most kids. Not that I'm not buying the diagnosis. There's actually a good ted talk by a psychopath who realized he was a psychpath through his work with studying the brains of serial killers.
This interview with Reason is the first YouTube video that came up for me on Google, but I've seen the Ted talk, too. That is, if we're talking about the same person.
He's not a psychopath, or a serial killer (as far as anyone knows), but he shares common genes and other "stuff" with some since a number were in his family.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx8RxRn6dWU[/youtube]
So much nonsense from you re: consensual adult behaviors but can't disagree with this. The human brain is awesomely plastic. Things we put on the autism spectrum are superpowers in the hands of the right person, same with ADD, OCD and yes, sociopathy.DARTH wrote:
Or he has not had his "Trigger incident" yet?
Plenty of people share traits with serial killers and the like but never do anything of the sort. Lots of serial killers and mass shooters have trigger incidents in their lives and they start to slide towards their darker sides, become wrapped in their own headworld and then go do what they are going to do. Some become methodical killers and sadist, others gear up and go out to kill a bunch and die at the end.
Fat Cat wrote:psychology is a scam
Fat Cat wrote:psychology is a scam
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DARTH wrote:I kind of think she's just a cunt.
One of the things I like about the new Sherlock is that he is an admitted socialpath and makes no bones about it.
Grossman says soldiers before stimuls-response training was understood, who could willingly aim at another man and kill him and move on and repeat are a form of temporary or situational socialpath.
Good, repetitive stimulis-response training can make most of us situational social paths.
Lots of these little assholes who shoot up crowds are what you can get when you combine fucked up + mental drugs + 1st person shooters.
She said sociopaths are charming.cleaner464 wrote:Does ~@~ count twice?
The key to success is to make your particular mental illness work for you rather than against you.Blaidd Drwg wrote: The human brain is awesomely plastic. Things we put on the autism spectrum are superpowers in the hands of the right person, same with ADD, OCD and yes, sociopathy.
WildGorillaMan wrote:The key to success is to make your particular mental illness work for you rather than against you.Blaidd Drwg wrote: The human brain is awesomely plastic. Things we put on the autism spectrum are superpowers in the hands of the right person, same with ADD, OCD and yes, sociopathy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6jrRqGwtB8Bob Wildes wrote:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DARTH wrote:I kind of think she's just a cunt.
One of the things I like about the new Sherlock is that he is an admitted socialpath and makes no bones about it.
Grossman says soldiers before stimuls-response training was understood, who could willingly aim at another man and kill him and move on and repeat are a form of temporary or situational socialpath.
Good, repetitive stimulis-response training can make most of us situational social paths.
Lots of these little assholes who shoot up crowds are what you can get when you combine fucked up + mental drugs + 1st person shooters.
I don't know who Grossman is, but I think that he is completely wrong about soldiers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DARTH wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6jrRqGwtB8Bob Wildes wrote:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DARTH wrote:I kind of think she's just a cunt.
One of the things I like about the new Sherlock is that he is an admitted socialpath and makes no bones about it.
Grossman says soldiers before stimuls-response training was understood, who could willingly aim at another man and kill him and move on and repeat are a form of temporary or situational socialpath.
Good, repetitive stimulis-response training can make most of us situational social paths.
Lots of these little assholes who shoot up crowds are what you can get when you combine fucked up + mental drugs + 1st person shooters.
I don't know who Grossman is, but I think that he is completely wrong about soldiers.
Don't know if you got the time but you can patch together the whole thing, then let me know your opinion. I do not agree 100% with Groosman and SLA Marshall's work has expossed flaws (and Hackworth proved him as a bloated bullshiter about his own combat exp. But it's the accounts of the soldiers here and the process the host goes through that really supports the theory pretty damn good.
You always have exceptions with people though.
Link together all the episodes, it takes under 2 hours and you will see his views and instincts change a lot. By the time he has worked at DARC with an SF instructor in CQB and then did MOUNT exercises with Marines who had just come back from Iraq, he admits you feel good hitting a man with a simunition and he can see where he probably could do it because in the drills he engaged and fired without thinking about it.Bob Wildes wrote:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DARTH wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6jrRqGwtB8Bob Wildes wrote:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DARTH wrote:I kind of think she's just a cunt.
One of the things I like about the new Sherlock is that he is an admitted socialpath and makes no bones about it.
Grossman says soldiers before stimuls-response training was understood, who could willingly aim at another man and kill him and move on and repeat are a form of temporary or situational socialpath.
Good, repetitive stimulis-response training can make most of us situational social paths.
Lots of these little assholes who shoot up crowds are what you can get when you combine fucked up + mental drugs + 1st person shooters.
I don't know who Grossman is, but I think that he is completely wrong about soldiers.
Don't know if you got the time but you can patch together the whole thing, then let me know your opinion. I do not agree 100% with Groosman and SLA Marshall's work has expossed flaws (and Hackworth proved him as a bloated bullshiter about his own combat exp. But it's the accounts of the soldiers here and the process the host goes through that really supports the theory pretty damn good.
You always have exceptions with people though.
I've got the time this time of year.
I watched the video. The only thing I can say is that the thought process of the man at the end; the one that stated that he would probably not be able to fight Hitler after viewing those videos, is so foreign to anything I can imagine.
Some people need killing. Most don't.
Pity for those that need killing is something that I cannot relate to.