The couch thread

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

Let's be real here, if she does that and goes through with it as per this post, she is a twat... its one thing to get what you deserve from a divorce, its another to fuck other's lives up.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

Look at it this way also, if you were in a position to ensure the financial security of your family for the next few generations, wouldn't you consider it. I'm sure she has more information about the internal finances of the corporate structure than we do. The current affiliate model was due to come under more intense scrutiny as the stakes got higher anyway. Any affiliate that doesn't have a co-brand, a plan in place to stand alone or at least a way to align themselves with other potentially former affiliates would have eventually gone under when "Dear Leader" decided it was his turn to cash out.
Last edited by Cave Canem on Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tantum validus superstes


Blaidd Drwg
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 19098
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:39 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Blaidd Drwg »

It is the best of all possible worlds for this to happen. Only after the last shred of dignity is gone from this fad, will their failure be complete. I rejoice at the prospect of Dale Saran committing several bar-able offenses of tortious interference in the ensuing blowout.
"He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that." JS Mill

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

Non issue. Plus, affiliate shouldn't have to do shit, only franchisees would

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

There are some serious retards in that thread. I like that Brendan guy who wants to give up his ass for rape

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

Nobody in that thread gets it, and if they do, they're not admitting it: It's not about the affiliates and the quality of their life, it's about Glassman losing control.

It's too bad that nobody saw something like this coming...
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

A little blast from the couch thread past;
I am the founder of CrossFit. This company was built on my vision for how the world should and could exercise to greater advantage and effect. CF's success in this regard, and it has been significant, was built from Lauren's wisdom, perseverance, and understanding of my vision. I could not imagine a better more capable business partner than Lauren Glassman. With my good luck this relationship, our collaboration, will continue for the next 75 years!
Last edited by Cave Canem on Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

There is a difference between branding and changing the brand.

And the people that will get hurt could be small business owners.

@fit has flaws, plenty of them, but each affiliate has their own methods of business and has their own programming which makes them almost as different as 24 hour fitness and Golds Gym. I wonder what would happen to them if this deal goes through because that is what the essence of it is.

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

WildGorillaMan wrote:Nobody in that thread gets it, and if they do, they're not admitting it: It's not about the affiliates and the quality of their life, it's about Glassman losing control.

It's too bad that nobody saw something like this coming...
Yes it is about him losing control. As long as the fine print still allows affiliates to run it as they see fit I am fine with it.

No one man is bigger than a company. Period. Everyone is replaceable.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

Jay wrote:
WildGorillaMan wrote:Nobody in that thread gets it, and if they do, they're not admitting it: It's not about the affiliates and the quality of their life, it's about Glassman losing control.

It's too bad that nobody saw something like this coming...
Yes it is about him losing control. As long as the fine print still allows affiliates to run it as they see fit I am fine with it.

No one man is bigger than a company. Period. Everyone is replaceable.
Yeah, we saw that in North Korea.
Tantum validus superstes

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: The couch thread

Post by Turdacious »

CrossFitters,

I have some important news for you. Anthos Capital wants to take control of the CrossFit affiliate system. Anthos is offering $20 million to a non-managing equity partner of CrossFit Inc. in order to establish a managing stake in the company. This is important because Anthos does not view CrossFit affiliates the way we all do. Anthos doesn't care about professional trainers improving people's lives; they see CrossFit affiliates as a mechanism to sell more supplements and equipment.


@fit's a business? Get outta here!
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

From facebook:

To the Affiliates of CrossFit, Inc.,

It was over two and a half years ago that I filed for divorce. When I first filed, I had hoped that, despite the pending divorce, I could continue to work alongside Greg.

Greg and I created CrossFit from its infancy. We are equal co-owners of the stock. We ran the company together. I felt and still feel I have a lot to offer CrossFit, but Greg made it clear that, with the divorce, he no longer wanted my involvement. I approached several alternatives for CrossFit, as it has long been my contention that CrossFit is in need of more professional management, corporate structure and accountability. I have heard from many of you that you feel the same.

About three months ago, I learned that there was interest from an outside party to purchase my 50% interest in CrossFit. While the thought of a clean buy-out, without leveraging the company was very intriguing to me, I wanted to make sure that the new-co-owner would not only pay me a fair price but was the right fit for the company and its affiliates. After meeting with the principals of Anthos Capital, I am confident that Anthos is the right choice for both of those reasons.

Contrary to what I have read on the CrossFit blog, I am not selling control of the company to Anthos. I don’t have control to sell. Anthos will be co-equal owners with Greg, just as I am.

Additionally, Anthos has emphatically told me, after reading the most recent postings on the blog that they will not “force all CrossFit affiliates to morph from professional training facilities into supplement and equipment peddlers.” Nor will affiliates report to “a domineering bureaucracy that seeks to extract maximal profit while micro-managing every significant facet of their business.” If you go to their website, you will see that Anthos clearly states that they take a hands-off approach with companies they invest in. They have also told me their intent is to continue to have Greg run the company.

Greg and I started and then grew CrossFit together, making a lot of sacrifices to get the company to where it is today. I know and recognize that our affiliates worked very hard and made many sacrifices themselves and that their efforts contributed to our growth. It is my hope that everyone understands that I did not come to this decision lightly. I came to this decision after reviewing several options and considering what is in the best interests for all.

Sincerely,

Lauren Jenai Glassman

User avatar

Testiclaw
Top
Posts: 1844
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:30 pm
Location: Between the thighs, taint, and retractable claw.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Testiclaw »

Fuck that, I would have told those cocksuckers that it was my 50% and I can sell it to whomever I please.

And if the affiliates don't like it, they can band together and come up with a counteroffer.
My cousin is a redheaded german-mexican, we call him a beanerschnitzel

User avatar

Turdacious
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21247
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:54 am
Location: Upon the eternal throne of the great Republic of Turdistan

Re: The couch thread

Post by Turdacious »

I see no reason why professional investors wouldn't want their equity managed by a hotheaded, petty, disheveled drunk who has a history of sleeping with his subordinates.
"Liberalism is arbitrarily selective in its choice of whose dignity to champion." Adrian Vermeule

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

All of a sudden everyone is acting like the ffiliates are franchises. Beget, Green, Saran, et al.

User avatar

Herv100
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3783
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:12 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Herv100 »

Turdacious wrote:I see no reason why professional investors wouldn't want their equity managed by a hotheaded, petty, disheveled drunk who has a history of sleeping with his subordinates.
Hey, leave that Lauren cunt out of this and focus on bashing Couch!
Image

User avatar

Hymen Asshole
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:21 am
Location: down the trailer park

Re: The couch thread

Post by Hymen Asshole »

Poor Andrea, her dream of opening a gym on the beach in Santa Monica are dashed
agerbomb.png
agerbomb.png (174.67 KiB) Viewed 6120 times

User avatar

kreator
Top
Posts: 1287
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:52 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by kreator »

Hymen Asshole wrote:Poor Andrea, her dream of opening a gym on the beach in Santa Monica are dashed
agerbomb.png
People are so selfish! Why couldn't more people donate 5 or 10k here and there?


milosz
Top
Posts: 1876
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:40 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by milosz »

What kind of delusional fuck thinks they can raise $100k in 30 days from strangers to open a gym?

User avatar

Holland Oates
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 14137
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:32 am
Location: GAWD'S Country
Contact:

Re: The couch thread

Post by Holland Oates »

Shafpocalypse Now wrote:All of a sudden everyone is acting like the ffiliates are franchises. Beget, Green, Saran, et al.
So could this kind of approach bite them in the ass in regards to tax stuff?

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

Here's a blow by blow of today's antics;

http://anthosandcrossfit.blogspot.com/
Tantum validus superstes


Steggy
Sarge
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:04 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Steggy »

Jay wrote:I wonder what would happen to them if this deal goes through because that is what the essence of it is.
Not much as the VC will not have a controlling interest so they can't force any changes unless Couch approves too.


Steggy
Sarge
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:04 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Steggy »

https://www.facebook.com/berger.russell ... 0492123520
"Dear CrossFitters:

My name is Bryan Kelly and I am a Managing Director at Anthos Capital. As you may have heard, we have entered into a definitive agreement to purchase Lauren Glassman’s ownership interest in CrossFit subject to court approval. I am writing to tell you about us, respond directly to misunderstandings about our objectives, and to tell you that we will be supportive, non-managing, value-add partners to CrossFit, the affiliates, and the community.

By way of personal background, I have been CrossFitting for the past two years and know and love the CrossFit community. Like many of you, CrossFit has had a profound positive impact on my wellness and life. Due to CrossFit, I’m in better shape at 34 than I was at 24 and I hope that I’ll be even healthier at 44 than I am now. Many of my colleagues are also active CrossFit participants, and feel the same way. I developed tremendous respect for Coach Glassman and the Affiliates in revolutionizing the fitness industry. This is what attracted our firm to consider investing in CrossFit.

We got to know the CrossFit team over several years, built a mutual respect, and became interested in the idea of investing. We learned of Lauren’s interest in selling her shares and reached an agreement with her that we believe will be beneficial to all. Our investment accomplishes several things: it provides Lauren with a fair and orderly transition out of CrossFit (consistent with her role of co-founder of CrossFit and her 50% ownership interest), it doesn’t create substantial financial obligations for CrossFit in connection with a buy out of Lauren’s interests, and it results in Greg having a partner who respects him and his vision and will support him in his efforts to further build the company.

Grossly inaccurate claims have been made about our intentions. For clarity, our plan is to help Coach Glassman professionally execute his vision by playing a supporting, hands off role. Greg will continue as CEO and we will be an investor with no managing responsibilities. We will own 50%, not a majority. We will be equal partners. We have absolutely no desire to change the affiliate model by turning them into Globo gyms. Our core philosophy as investors is to be supportive, non-control partners to the companies and teams we back.

I have met with Greg several times. It is my style to brainstorm and throw out a variety of ideas that the entrepreneur can take or leave as he/she pleases. After hearing feedback from several of you affiliates, my suggestion is that affiliates could benefit if CrossFit HQ (or a third party provider) offered optional technology services (website, member billing, member communication) to Affiliates that wanted them – those that wanted to could employ these initiatives, those that did not want to would conduct business as usual.

We raise ideas, but ultimately the decision is Greg’s and we view our role as one that helps, not directs. More broadly, the reason we are attracted to CrossFit is because of its important Affiliate model. We have absolutely no intention or desire to create a franchise model, tell you how to run your business, or force you to sell products you don’t believe in.

We know the affiliates are the lifeblood of the community and are critical to the long-term success of CrossFit – both as a fitness revolution and as a business. In short, why would an investor want to destroy the future of a company in which they invest? We want to do well in the future by you doing well in the future.

As we all know though, a core tenant of CrossFit is the relentless pursuit of betterment. We’re confident that our partnership can help do that.

Best Regards,

Bryan

User avatar

Crust Bucket
Lord of the thighs
Posts: 18936
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Eating a cookie in Bikini Bottom.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Crust Bucket »

Jesus what asshats. Nothing like discussing business over facebook and the rest of the internet :finga:
syaigh wrote: The thought of eating that giant veiny monstrosity makes me want to barf.
You're an ASS!
ImageImage

User avatar

Chessman
Top
Posts: 1465
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:12 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Chessman »



From 0:05-1:45 is exactly why you NEVER, ever allow anyone else to build a business inside of yours. Why should a trainer only expect part of the money? Because they didn't pay for the equipment, the rent, the marketing, the utilities, or anything else associated with the business. If you allow them to build a business inside of yours and they leave, you got what you deserved.

It is interesting, though, that they will allow an affiliate to start inside an established fitness business like that since any trainer that could pull it off would have a huge advantage over a guy starting his box from scratch. The fears of the garage gym guys in that case are well founded.
Image

Post Reply