IGX

An Adams County man is in shock after he says deputies shot and killed his dog.

Jeff Fisher said deputies went to his house by mistake. He said when they forced their way through the door his dog Ziggy ran outside and an Adams County Sheriff’s deputy shot and killed him.

...

Fisher said he wants that deputy to be held accountable.

“I’m on the ground crying hysterically and the police officer says, ‘You need to calm down, you can get a new dog,’” said Fisher.

MarcoFP wrote:http://www.ksl.com/?sid=23824044


Capping unarmed women & stonewalling the investigation.

Blaidd Drwg wrote:1 Guy gets assaulted.

2. Guy calls police.

3. When police arrive, guy complains that they took 45 minutes to get there (note: from my personal experience, it’s amazing they arrived at all)

4. Cop doesn’t like his authority questioned, and responds “Listen to me. First of all, I’m not on your time watch (sic).”

5. Cop then steps forward and gets in guy’s face.

6. Guy informs him he’s a soldier. Cop complains that guy stepped up to him

7. Cop punches guy hard in the face and tells guy that he’s a marine.

8. Guy gets handcuffed by cop’s fat partner.

9. Cops never follow-up on people who assaulted guy in the first place.

10. Later, cop explains that “because you got all soldiered up on me… I had to use physical force to maintain control of the situation,” but he kindly won’t charge the guy.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM02kr5DwoE[/youtube]

Batboy2/75 wrote:

Blaidd Drwg wrote:1 Guy gets assaulted.

2. Guy calls police.

3. When police arrive, guy complains that they took 45 minutes to get there (note: from my personal experience, it’s amazing they arrived at all)

4. Cop doesn’t like his authority questioned, and responds “Listen to me. First of all, I’m not on your time watch (sic).”

5. Cop then steps forward and gets in guy’s face.

6. Guy informs him he’s a soldier. Cop complains that guy stepped up to him

7. Cop punches guy hard in the face and tells guy that he’s a marine.

8. Guy gets handcuffed by cop’s fat partner.

9. Cops never follow-up on people who assaulted guy in the first place.

10. Later, cop explains that “because you got all soldiered up on me… I had to use physical force to maintain control of the situation,” but he kindly won’t charge the guy.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM02kr5DwoE[/youtube]

They wonder why they are hated.

DARTH wrote:

Batboy2/75 wrote:

Blaidd Drwg wrote:1 Guy gets assaulted.

2. Guy calls police.

3. When police arrive, guy complains that they took 45 minutes to get there (note: from my personal experience, it’s amazing they arrived at all)

4. Cop doesn’t like his authority questioned, and responds “Listen to me. First of all, I’m not on your time watch (sic).”

5. Cop then steps forward and gets in guy’s face.

6. Guy informs him he’s a soldier. Cop complains that guy stepped up to him

7. Cop punches guy hard in the face and tells guy that he’s a marine.

8. Guy gets handcuffed by cop’s fat partner.

9. Cops never follow-up on people who assaulted guy in the first place.

10. Later, cop explains that “because you got all soldiered up on me… I had to use physical force to maintain control of the situation,” but he kindly won’t charge the guy.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM02kr5DwoE[/youtube]

Come on, if cops have the right to kill a person without trial, they have to be able to beat on them a bit without repercussions.



They wonder why they are hated.

Soldier should wait a few years. Find cop's house, set fire to it in the middle of the night and gut shoot cop as he runs out.

But it may not be who gets the reward, but whether anyone does. It may have been offered with a catch: capture and conviction.

Beck said at the time the reward was offered, "The reward is for the capture and conviction."

So does Dorner's death let the city off the hook? University of Southern California law professor Dan Simon thinks not. Asked if it's better public relations to give away the money, Simon said, "I think so. ... I don't think the city should hide behind legalistic terminology."

Los Angeles' mayor and police chief say the decision on the money rests with 20 different groups that agreed to contribute to the $1 million reward.

For more on the legal situation surrounding the reward, "CBS This Morning" turned to CBS News legal analyst Jack Ford. He said on "CBS This Morning" the question now is if the reward is an enforceable contract. He said, "If you don't have a document that's signed by both sides, it can't be a contract, right? The answer is no. You can have a contract, an oral type of contract. As long as both sides, there's was an offer, there was an acceptance, somebody acted as a consequence of that. Starting off, yeah, there can be an enforceable contract here, but the big question is, what's the wording and what do the people on the other side do and does what they did fit within the confines of the wording here?"

Batboy2/75 wrote:The officer Friendly that happens to be the Police Superintendent of the Chicago PD believes;

1) Supporters of the 2nd Ammendment and legal Gun owners are Agents of corruption

2) the Constitution should be interpreted via opinion polls.


http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases ... 88711.html





You can't make this shit up.

" Garry McCarthy 's understanding of our Constitution barely qualifies him as a meter maid, never mind the chief of the nation's third largest police department," commented ISRA Executive Director Richard Pearson . "What on earth would possess McCarthy to assert that constitutional rights should be meted out based on public opinion polls?"
PR Newswire (http://s.tt/1zT3n)

What if I told you police in your town could desensitize themselves to the idea of shooting a child, a pregnant woman, or a young mother, for just a couple of bucks? The "No More Hesitation" series from Law Enforcement Targets Inc. offers exactly that. For less than 99 cents per target, police can shoot at real-life images "designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training."

baffled wrote:http://reason.com/blog/2013/02/19/is-yo ... t-using-pi

What if I told you police in your town could desensitize themselves to the idea of shooting a child, a pregnant woman, or a young mother, for just a couple of bucks? The "No More Hesitation" series from Law Enforcement Targets Inc. offers exactly that. For less than 99 cents per target, police can shoot at real-life images "designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training."

I'm not posting an image to any of this crap.

Here are the 10 reports of police misconduct tracked for Friday, February 15, 2013:

New Orleans, Louisiana: Police are denying allegations of police misconduct after a video was released that shows multiple plainclothes officers accosting two teenage boys for no apparent reason. When one of their mothers, who is also a police officer, approached the scene, they let the boys go and all left abruptly. ow.ly/hKZJi


Sandwich, Massachusetts: An off-duty officer is accused of ramming the rear of a family member’s car several times. He was suspended and placed on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation. ow.ly/hKre6

Memphis, Tennessee: After an Internal Affairs review of a fight, seven police officers have been suspended without pay. http://ow.ly/hQDxl

Macon, Georgia: Two officers have been arrested and accused of illegally acquiring guns. They have been charged with fiduciary theft and violating their oaths of office. Both men resigned in lieu of termination. http://ow.ly/hKv3c

Birmingham, Alabama: A police officer was arrested after an altercation with her husband’s ex-wife. She was reassigned to administrative duties after her department learned of the arrest. http://ow.ly/hKx5B

Portland, Oregon: An officer pleaded guilty to reduced charges and has been sentenced in a harassment case that resulted from an incident. He was accused of breaking into his estranged wife’s apartment and threatening to kill her boyfriend. http://ow.ly/hKJ8U

Indianapolis, Indiana: An officer has been accused of causing a fatal car crash by driving drunk. He faces charges of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, reckless homicide, and criminal recklessness. http://ow.ly/hKKUp
Fort Worth, Texas: A police officer, who was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving, when he already had a DWI charge pending, has been fired. http://ow.ly/hKMdS

Pine Bluff, Arkansas: A police officer has been arrested for felony theft. He faces burglary charges along with felony and misdemeanor counts of theft of property. ow.ly/hKMS6

Blaidd Drwg wrote:Cottage Grove, Oregon: The mother of an elementary school student who says local police coerced her 10-year-old son into confessing to alleged sex offenses is suing the police department and the school district. She says in the lawsuit that she previously told the school district that her son was not allowed to be interviewed by police without her being present.

http://www.registerguard.com/web/news/c ... n.html.csp

baffled wrote:http://reason.com/blog/2013/02/19/is-yo ... t-using-pi

What if I told you police in your town could desensitize themselves to the idea of shooting a child, a pregnant woman, or a young mother, for just a couple of bucks? The "No More Hesitation" series from Law Enforcement Targets Inc. offers exactly that. For less than 99 cents per target, police can shoot at real-life images "designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training."

I'm not posting an image to any of this crap.

Blaidd Drwg wrote:Cottage Grove, Oregon: The mother of an elementary school student who says local police coerced her 10-year-old son into confessing to alleged sex offenses is suing the police department and the school district. She says in the lawsuit that she previously told the school district that her son was not allowed to be interviewed by police without her being present.

http://www.registerguard.com/web/news/c ... n.html.csp

Turdacious wrote:

Blaidd Drwg wrote:Cottage Grove, Oregon: The mother of an elementary school student who says local police coerced her 10-year-old son into confessing to alleged sex offenses is suing the police department and the school district. She says in the lawsuit that she previously told the school district that her son was not allowed to be interviewed by police without her being present.

http://www.registerguard.com/web/news/c ... n.html.csp

Not sure if her rights were infringed on, although the rights of her son might have been. Unfortunately, a lot of sex abuse occurs in the home. Kind of surprised that there wasn't a children's advocate present though.

Lewis Medlock wrote:

baffled wrote:http://reason.com/blog/2013/02/19/is-yo ... t-using-pi

What if I told you police in your town could desensitize themselves to the idea of shooting a child, a pregnant woman, or a young mother, for just a couple of bucks? The "No More Hesitation" series from Law Enforcement Targets Inc. offers exactly that. For less than 99 cents per target, police can shoot at real-life images "designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training."

I'm not posting an image to any of this crap.

So paper targets can be used to "desensitize" but playing video games hour after hour day after day are not desensitizing at all?

Blaidd Drwg wrote:

Turdacious wrote:

Blaidd Drwg wrote:Cottage Grove, Oregon: The mother of an elementary school student who says local police coerced her 10-year-old son into confessing to alleged sex offenses is suing the police department and the school district. She says in the lawsuit that she previously told the school district that her son was not allowed to be interviewed by police without her being present.

http://www.registerguard.com/web/news/c ... n.html.csp

Not sure if her rights were infringed on, although the rights of her son might have been. Unfortunately, a lot of sex abuse occurs in the home. Kind of surprised that there wasn't a children's advocate present though.

I kind of assumed she was suing on behalf of the kid although there may be a component of her suing for infringement of her custodial rights as a parent. The 1st amendment has been found somewhat inapplicable in schools, certainly AZ treats the rest of the Bill with disdain so this may be a tough case.

Sexual abuse anywhere is horrid but if you've spent any time around children you quickly realize, the accusations and "confessions" of someone under the age of 12 are to be treated as somewhat suspect...always. Children's thinking and memory is so plastic it often seems to me that their experience is more hallucinatory than not until they are around 10-11.