The couch thread

Topics without replies are pruned every 365 days. Not moderated.

Moderator: Dux

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

Captain Quack wrote:
Jay wrote:@fitters and fucking up form is as common as a dog taking a shit.
Well, required fucked-up form by exercise choice and associated movement "standards" is not exclusively @F's domain, however, they do specialize in it.
Part of their modal domain bullshit is bad form.

Its true and it needs to be in their joke of a level 1 test.

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

@fit discovers thick-bar training.

http://journal.crossfit.com/2011/06/sha ... t-boys.tpl
Shake Hands With the Fat Boys
By Daniel Hersee

In Equipment
June 20, 2011

Daniel Hersee says using equipment with an increased diameter can improve strength and reduce injuries.

Old-time strongmen knew all about thick-bar training and used it to great effect, but it’s been forgotten in modern times. Recently, there has been something of a rebirth of thick-bar training, with National Football League teams, Army Special Forces, Ultimate Fighting Championship fighters and powerlifters using thick bars to help make significant strength gains.

Thick bars are simply barbells, dumbbells and pull-up bars with a thicker diameter. A standard barbell, dumbbell or pull-up bar typically has a handle with a diameter of about 1 inch. A thick bar will often have a diameter of more like 2.5 inches. Some look more like truck axles, and if you’ve ever picked one up you will know that it feels completely different. Thick-bar training simply means using a thick barbell, thick dumbbells and a thick chin-up bar in your usual training program.
The time is clearly right for Kubik to reissue Dinosaur Training rebadged for @fit.
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

Thick bar training works for thick bar handling.

I bought my Apollon's Axle in 1996 after I read Kubik's Dinosaur Training. In the ensuing years, this is what I noticed.

1. If you DL double overhand with the axle, you're grip for equivalent weights on a regular bar becomes very, very solid. Thick bar work tends to be very good for that static kind of grip training.

2. Curls, and especially reverse curls, with the thick bar is hard on the elbows.

3. Benching with the thick bar is a nice change of pace. It's just different enough.

4. The axle works better for zercher work, if you work without padding. I don't know how some of those fuckers can do zercher work with a regular barbell and no padding, it leaves dramatic bruises with the thick bar.

My verdict is that a thick bar is much more useful than a sandbag.

User avatar

Jag Panzer
Gunny
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:07 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jag Panzer »

I tried to grip an axle at a strongman comp a few months back. I see 80kg on the bar and figure that's an easy clean.

Wrong.

I started using my Fat Gripz a lot more after that day.


TerryB
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9697
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by TerryB »

What is this new thick bar Crossfit is talking about??

Leave it to Couch to think of everything!

I suspect this will really take off!
"Know that! & Know it deep you fucking loser!"

Image


Mountebank
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3439
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: Somewhere else

Re: The couch thread

Post by Mountebank »

Attention Reebok and other @Fers that don't realize yet what fearful jealous bitches inhabit @FHQ...here is your wake-up call. Just remember that couch himself said that competition was a good thing in regards to affiliates and that the cream would rise to the top...unless someone else is competing with @F, that is.

The short backstory:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... .com/about
About WWS

We are a competitive league for local affiliates.

Our goal is to provide more opportunities to compete, more opportunities to build bonds within and among affiliates, and one more reason to push your fitness to the next level.
In the fall of 2010, WWS hosted its first season in Northern California with 17 affiliates and 121 athletes.

In 2011, we're expanding. Welcome Northern Virginia!

Affiliate teams will compete head-to-head in WODs that cover multiple time and modal domains to ensure that the strength, stamina, and mental fortitude of each individual and of each team is pushed to the limit.

It’s low-key, but there will be kick-ass WODs programmed by James "OPT" Fitzgerald and great opportunities to hang out with other CrossFitters in your community.
Then the smackdown comes...

http://www.weekendwarriorseries.com/blog/id/32
*Critical Update* Change in Prizes & Sponsors.
Posted June 14, 2011
No Shirt. No Shoes. No Service? No Way!

The Bottom Line: No Shirt, No Shoes.

WWS will no longer be able to provide apparel from Reebok, prize packages furnished by Reebok and Affiliates AsRx, nor will we be running a league in Northern Virginia. But the NorCal league will soldier on, if y'all are still interested. Here's the explanation:

Why Explain?

From the beginning, we have aimed to make this league as transparent as possible and provide a competitive event that responds to what athletes and affiliates want. With that in mind, we feel it is absolutely critical that we explain why we are unable to provide what we have been advertising the last three months.

Without the following explanation, the reasonable inference from this exodus would be that Michael or Matt had done something unprofessional or unethical to lose our key support. While we would normally err on the side of silence, we cannot allow the league’s reputation and, frankly, our personal reputations, to suffer because of a conflict we have nothing to do with.

The following is a statement of the unfortunate circumstances that have led us to this point and forced us to choose between honoring our commitments to partners and the expansion and sponsorship opportunities for WWS.

What Happened?

Since the league started, we have aimed to secure HQ’s support in all aspects of the league, and therefore we have been in periodic contact with them to let them know what we’re doing. We checked in about starting the league and about whether or not we could seek sponsorships. HQ did not object to us running the league. They also told us they did not object to us seeking sponsorships.

As you know, by February we partnered with Reebok, OPT and Affiliates AsRx. Each of these companies agreed to provide certain services that would help enhance what WWS could offer athletes. No money was involved in these deals. These companies were simply excited about the opportunity to participate in a competitive league in Northern California and perhaps other parts of the country. They also provided services that were necessary for us to keep the league viable. Each sponsor knew of the others’ involvement.

Just two weeks ago, after sponsors had begun work, marketing flyers were printed and mailed and registration had already opened, we received a call from Reebok stating that HQ called them and objected to their participation in an event in which OPT was a sponsor and providing programming.

We scheduled a call with HQ during which they explained their objections to OPTs involvement in any event where Reebok and HQ staff members are involved. It was a long conversation, and suffice to say they felt there was a fundamental conflict between Reebok’s and OPT’s involvement because they believed that OPT does not represent CrossFit and had disparaged CrossFit. Accordingly, they indicated they could not support the league if OPT remained involved and recommended that we break our contract with OPT.

On both the suggestion of HQ and our own initiative, we immediately spoke with James “OPT” Fitzgerald and other members of the CrossFit community. We also conducted independent research to see what we could find about this conflict. Ultimately, after that investigation, we could find no evidence describing, justifying or even mentioning the conflict at hand nor any evidence that OPT had disparaged or undermined CrossFit.

Ultimately, we decided that we would not breach our contract with OPT. At a basic level, he was a partner of WWS who had lived up to his end of our deal. We had no evidence that OPT was undermining CrossFit or running contrary to our values and OPT had already provided us with his side of our agreement (the programming). For us, honoring commitments to our partners is simply a matter of integrity, even when it’s hard. We understood that this decision would likely mean the end of our sponsorships.

We relayed this information to HQ along with various compromise offers that did not involve breaking any of our commitments. Unfortunately, those compromise positions were not acceptable.

Reebok and our partners in NOVA told us that, without HQ’s support and approval, they would reluctantly pulled out of their agreements with WWS. After confirming we would not break our agreement with OPT, that’s exactly what happened.

Affiliates AsRx had not been a part of the initial conversations. When we apprised them of the situation, they also reluctantly pulled out after already having provided us with some excellent support in marketing the event.

We want to be clear about one thing. This isn’t about allegiance to HQ or OPT. We would have done the same for Reebok or Affiliates AsRx or our partners in NOVA had the tables been turned. As we said before, it’s about honoring commitments, even at the expense of all the time, money, and effort that we have already poured into this league.

So that’s it. Unless someone wants to try and call bullshit on our account, this is all the detail we’re going to get into on or off the record. We will continue to err on the side of discretion and leave the email chains, phone records and other Law&Order-silliness out of it. Life is just too short.

Next Steps: No Service? No way!

We'd still like to run this league so that WWS will solider on in NorCal this year. So, it’s back to basics. No corporate sponsors or tricked out prize packs – just a bunch of hard, pipe hittin’ athletes who want to work their butts off outside an industrial warehouse on a few Saturdays this fall. Same great format and set up as last year plus some updates you asked for like open rosters – just no SWAG. There’ll still be prizes like last year, and there will still be a nice little paleo feast to wrap it all up.

For us, WWS has always been more about the workouts and hanging out with people you just went toe-to-toe with in a WOD than the free t-shirts.

So, if you’re still interested even though the free gear and prizes won’t be there, we’ll compete. We’ll hang out. And we’ll have fun.

In recognition of that, early bird registration prices are good during all of registration (until July 15th). And just so you know, you can register at no risk. If we don't have a critical mass of affiliates, we will refund 100% of your money -- no questions asked. So we hope you'll sign up.

Thanks for the continuing support.

Compete.

--Michael & Matt
OPT won the first @F gaymes, had an affiliate since near the beginning. He's also started his own seminar series. Now he's programming for the first major competitor.

Oh the drama! Reebok and @F will both get what they deserve out of this deal.

User avatar

GoDogGo!
IGX Honorary Lesbian
Posts: 11208
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:10 am
Location: Casa de Culo

Re: The couch thread

Post by GoDogGo! »

a bunch of hard, pipe hittin’ athletes
Um... someone might want to tell him what that means.
The flesh is weak, and the smell of pussy is strong like a muthafucka.

User avatar

Yes I Have Balls
Top
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Wherever they's a fight so hungry people can eat

Re: The couch thread

Post by Yes I Have Balls »

GoDogGo! wrote:
a bunch of hard, pipe hittin’ athletes
Um... someone might want to tell him what that means.
No doubt

Image

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

Captain Quack wrote:
OPT won the first @F gaymes, had an affiliate since near the beginning. He's also started his own seminar series. Now he's programming for the first major competitor.

Oh the drama! Reebok and @F will both get what they deserve out of this deal.
OPT fires back.

http://optexperience.com/blog/item/just-do-it
OPT does not represent CrossFit?

what does "represenation" mean?

how does a sport grow without critical thinking about how to do the sport, how to train the athletes within and how to coach coaches on fitness?

what individual sport out there has rules and regulations on what you wear, who your trainer is and what training methodology you choose?

what sport out there does not allow those in the sport to ask questions, make observations and request some thoughts into the evolution of the sport?

some thoughts to ponder on.....what are your thoughts?

- we have been asked to wear Reebok gear for the Games:
"Athletes must wear their (Reebok) uniforms as they take the field for their heat. You may, however, remove your shirt for or during the workout, but you can't wear a different shirt during the workout. You can wear whatever accessories you like as long as they are not visibly branded with logos or marks of Reebok's competitors. You can wear any footwear without restriction"

from here:
- for my own reasons of maintenance of integrity, not getting lost in the mix of drama vs. sport and "sticking" to my gut instinct, i will not be participating this year
- i personally will forge forward in the teaching and design of how to be fit, and continually be open to options of how to test, train and evolve fitness on this blog for our family and those who wish to be invloved in this
- we'll monitor, test, learn, etc...all in the search for answers without interruption

ONWARD!
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.

User avatar

Crust Bucket
Lord of the thighs
Posts: 18936
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Eating a cookie in Bikini Bottom.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Crust Bucket »

Fuck I hate these people :finga:
I wish them all illness and injury...That is all :butthead:
syaigh wrote: The thought of eating that giant veiny monstrosity makes me want to barf.
You're an ASS!
ImageImage

User avatar

lasalle
Top
Posts: 1205
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:13 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by lasalle »

Crust Bucket wrote:Fuck I hate these people :finga:
I wish them all illness and injury...That is all :butthead:
Why all the hate? Oh, wait a minute...



Mountebank
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3439
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: Somewhere else

Re: The couch thread

Post by Mountebank »

LOL! A story about "Nicole Bally":
http://blog.web.blogads.com/2011/06/08/ ... -facebook/
6/11/11 UPDATE: Facebook pulled down the Nicole Bally profile overnight. I wonder what was Facebook’s definitive evidence in making the call to delete… or was the profile just an embarrassment for supposedly savvy media figures, Silicon Valley insiders and Facebook itself, better erased than learned from? As of last night, 11 of 697 Bally’s friends — including Jimmy Wales, Eli Pariser, Peter Shankman, Jake Dobkin, Andrew Raseij — had owned up to their mistake, unfriended Bally and gained some wisdom from the encounter. Too bad more CEOs, Facebook board members, journalists and tech insiders didn’t get to make the same hard call in public. Meanwhile Celia Richards’ profile, with its misleading photo, is still intact.
Image
At least she can still be kinda famous for something!

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

They deserve everything that happens to them, including OPT....

for a guy who is as "smart" as he is about programming, for him to stay involved with @fit for so long is asinine. He may be a smart dude when it comes to training, but let's face it... he's a goddamn @fitter.

And someone sent me this today:

http://crossfit-strength.com/

I had a GREAT laugh at that one... nothing screams overtraining like doing a lot of assistance work for lifting along with long metcons.

Here is a sample day:

ME Lower Body:
Reverse Band Deadlifts (hanging green band)
Do sets of 5′s, 3′s working up to a max single.

Assistance:
Pull Throughs 3×20
Bent Rows 3×8
Hanging Leg Raises 3×10

MetCon:
20, 15, 10 reps of:
Thruster 95/65#
Burpee Pull ups

ok... let's assume these idiots are lifting raw... IMO reverse band shit has no place in a raw lifters arsenal. If you need more bottom-end/floor work, fucking do deficit pulls.

Assistance work is good, nothing shabby about that one. But then to add thrusters and burpee pullups after it all for a conditioning workout is kind of stupid. Kind of is a nice way to put it.... its as retarded as shit.

They have a combo of WSBB with other principles... its a case of trying to mix it all up into a blender and come out with a winner, but instead what comes out is no fucking real direction.

If you want to do DE/ME with metcons you REALLY have to lower the assistance work down to account for recovery. Doing a full PL-type template and then blowing out some 400m runs with some power cleans isn't the best idea for long term training health.

When I do strength biased programming for my online clients who still want to be fit, the conditioning workouts are short, simple, basic and never include 400m runs and nothing longer than 12 minutes. In fact that vast majority of their conditioning workouts are from 3-8 minutes in duration and many of them are interval based.

This webpage throws in the CFT in the middle of the WSBB template..... sorry, bad idea.

I fucking hate @fit... its beyond rational, I want to spit on the people who programmed this shit.

Why the fuck are @fitters so goddamn stupid with training?

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

They don't know a fucking thing about training other than what someone has told them. No practical, under the bar, experience.

They didn't load up and squat 405x8 in the middle of rugby season to keep strong while they had to keep their conditioning up...it is never a matter of successful competition or survival for them.

They never had to figure out which lifts didn't go with which other lifts, and why mixing them with 1/4 mile fast runs is a bad idea.

User avatar

Jay
Top
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: Tornado Alley

Re: The couch thread

Post by Jay »

The Lord Shafmungous wrote:They don't know a fucking thing about training other than what someone has told them. No practical, under the bar, experience.

They didn't load up and squat 405x8 in the middle of rugby season to keep strong while they had to keep their conditioning up...it is never a matter of successful competition or survival for them.

They never had to figure out which lifts didn't go with which other lifts, and why mixing them with 1/4 mile fast runs is a bad idea.
Very few @fitters played real sports or competed in anything other than @fit.

And it seems that the ones that used to all of a sudden got stupid with endorphin overload.

For every Lipson and Orlando there are 25 wanna-be's who overtrain their asses off because they don't have the genetics for that kind of workload.

User avatar

Shafpocalypse Now
Lifetime IGer
Posts: 21281
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:26 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Shafpocalypse Now »

Crossfit remains circuit training.

Circuit training never produced an elite athlete, and neither will crossfit.

That's why anyone who's actually competed at high levels and is involved with crossfit do their own version.


I'd Hit It
Sarge
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:25 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by I'd Hit It »

Jay wrote:Very few @fitters played real sports or competed in anything other than @fit.

And it seems that the ones that used to all of a sudden got stupid with endorphin overload.

For every Lipson and Orlando there are 25 wanna-be's who overtrain their asses off because they don't have the genetics for that kind of workload.
Furthermore, they fail to realize that handling that kind of workload required years of athletic training leading up to it, building a base of volume, conditioning, and strength that you don't get after a couple of months flailing around on pull-up structures.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

WildGorillaMan wrote:
Captain Quack wrote:
OPT won the first @F gaymes, had an affiliate since near the beginning. He's also started his own seminar series. Now he's programming for the first major competitor.

Oh the drama! Reebok and @F will both get what they deserve out of this deal.
OPT fires back.

http://optexperience.com/blog/item/just-do-it
- we have been asked to wear Reebok gear for the Games:
"Athletes must wear their (Reebok) uniforms as they take the field for their heat. You may, however, remove your shirt for or during the workout, but you can't wear a different shirt during the workout. You can wear whatever accessories you like as long as they are not visibly branded with logos or marks of Reebok's competitors. You can wear any footwear without restriction"
In the comments section, there is one of the funniest remarks about @fit that I have heard to date, "Our little baby is all grown up and she's a hooker..."
Tantum validus superstes


Boris
Top
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:54 am

Re: The couch thread

Post by Boris »

The Lord Shafmungous wrote: I bought my Apollon's Axle in 1996 after I read Kubik's Dinosaur Training.
I wanted a thick bar since the mid/late 90s, but could never bring myself to spend the 200-$300 an Apollon axle costs. I could probably thank CF for finally being able to get what is essentially thick pipe at (what I feel is) a reasonable cost.

User avatar

Dan Martin
Top
Posts: 1897
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:14 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by Dan Martin »

I own the first axle made.
Shomer Shabbos.

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

Dan Martin wrote:I own the first axle made.

You also owned the first wheel, Uncle Dan.
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.


tzg
Gunny
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by tzg »

Who's willing to bet that the people running those competitions will be persona au gratin because they published an account of how HQ does business?

User avatar

WildGorillaMan
Sergeant Commanding
Posts: 9951
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: The couch thread

Post by WildGorillaMan »

@fitters are going fucking bonkers that competitors at the Games are forbidden from wearing shirts from their affiliates or any sportswear made by anyone that isn't Reebok.
I have already had conference calls with Reebok about their bs... I was told point blank and I have it in writing that if I refuse to wear the Reebok provided clothes, I will not be allowed to compete... While I can't stand being manipulated, my entire livelihood is built around my CF affiliate. This is scary stuff.
...
Women are required to wear the Reebok sports bra, shorts, t-shirt and tank. I could take my shirt off, but I would still be wearing the reebok shit underneath. They told me I could wear funky socks (provided there are no logos on them) and my own shoes...so nice of them. It's BS.
Are t-shirts and apparel rules going to be the straw that broke the camel's back?
Image
You'll Hurt Your Back

basically I'm Raoul Duke trying to fit into a Philip K. Dick movie remake.


Mountebank
Sgt. Major
Posts: 3439
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: Somewhere else

Re: The couch thread

Post by Mountebank »

WildGorillaMan wrote:@fitters are going fucking bonkers that competitors at the Games are forbidden from wearing shirts from their affiliates or any sportswear made by anyone that isn't Reebok.
I have already had conference calls with Reebok about their bs... I was told point blank and I have it in writing that if I refuse to wear the Reebok provided clothes, I will not be allowed to compete... While I can't stand being manipulated, my entire livelihood is built around my CF affiliate. This is scary stuff.
...
Women are required to wear the Reebok sports bra, shorts, t-shirt and tank. I could take my shirt off, but I would still be wearing the reebok shit underneath. They told me I could wear funky socks (provided there are no logos on them) and my own shoes...so nice of them. It's BS.
Are t-shirts and apparel rules going to be the straw that broke the camel's back?
It is pretty damn arrogant to mandate that competitors (who are PAYING to compete) wear free clothes from a company that isn't paying them a dime.

The gaymes are really getting good now. Looks like they were all made for each other.

R@@bok and @F are definitely only thinking of the community when they do things like this, for surely.

User avatar

Cave Canem
Top
Posts: 1377
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Somebody's dog house somewhere.

Re: The couch thread

Post by Cave Canem »

WildGorillaMan wrote:@fitters are going fucking bonkers that competitors at the Games are forbidden from wearing shirts from their affiliates or any sportswear made by anyone that isn't Reebok.
I have already had conference calls with Reebok about their bs... I was told point blank and I have it in writing that if I refuse to wear the Reebok provided clothes, I will not be allowed to compete... While I can't stand being manipulated, my entire livelihood is built around my CF affiliate. This is scary stuff.
...
Women are required to wear the Reebok sports bra, shorts, t-shirt and tank. I could take my shirt off, but I would still be wearing the reebok shit underneath. They told me I could wear funky socks (provided there are no logos on them) and my own shoes...so nice of them. It's BS.
Are t-shirts and apparel rules going to be the straw that broke the camel's back?
Link ?
Tantum validus superstes

Post Reply