IGX

Batboy2/75 wrote:we would be better off minding our own business.

Batboy2/75 wrote:It's a sad state of affairs when the lesser of two evils is Ivan.

Fuck Europe and fuck NATO.

Wild Bill wrote:

It seems that to the US government, facts simply do not matter. In pre-February 22 Kiev, the legitimate government was warned against using any force to put down an armed revolt. That rebellion, now in power, is actually encouraged by the US to use military force against civilians in eastern Ukraine.

In fact, the US administration has called these military operations against unarmed civilians "proportionate and reasonable." US Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, who had just two months ago cheered on armed protesters seeking to overthrow the elected government in Kiev and warned that government against any response to the violent protests, was singing a different tune now that the US-backed insurgents have attained power. As Ukrainian military forces launched a bloody operation last week in the eastern city of Slavyansk, she told her UN counterparts that the Kiev "response is reasonable, it is proportional, and frankly it is what any one of our countries would have done in the face of this threat." Even Salon.com is finding it difficult to stomach the odious Samantha Power, calling her a "brazen hypocrite."

Smet wrote:

unknown wrote:oh,the fight for democracy.

http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-t ... -holdings/

unknown wrote:oh,the fight for democracy.

http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-t ... -holdings/

DrDonkeyLove wrote:

unknown wrote:oh,the fight for democracy.

http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-t ... -holdings/

Move along, nothing to see here.

One might think that allowing the son of the VPofUSA to have a financial interest in this tinderbox might show a scintilla of a conflict of interest that just might compromise the USA's noble position as a fair arbiter. That person would be WRONG because this administration is the most transparent and ethical in the history of the USofKKKA. It must be true since Obama said it himself.
Transparent ethics starts at 14 seconds in.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXWTdTnhebs[/youtube]

Smet wrote:http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/fe ... ilent.aspx

It seems that to the US government, facts simply do not matter. In pre-February 22 Kiev, the legitimate government was warned against using any force to put down an armed revolt. That rebellion, now in power, is actually encouraged by the US to use military force against civilians in eastern Ukraine.

In fact, the US administration has called these military operations against unarmed civilians "proportionate and reasonable." US Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, who had just two months ago cheered on armed protesters seeking to overthrow the elected government in Kiev and warned that government against any response to the violent protests, was singing a different tune now that the US-backed insurgents have attained power. As Ukrainian military forces launched a bloody operation last week in the eastern city of Slavyansk, she told her UN counterparts that the Kiev "response is reasonable, it is proportional, and frankly it is what any one of our countries would have done in the face of this threat." Even Salon.com is finding it difficult to stomach the odious Samantha Power, calling her a "brazen hypocrite."

Fat Cat wrote:

DrDonkeyLove wrote:

unknown wrote:oh,the fight for democracy.

http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-t ... -holdings/

Move along, nothing to see here.

One might think that allowing the son of the VPofUSA to have a financial interest in this tinderbox might show a scintilla of a conflict of interest that just might compromise the USA's noble position as a fair arbiter. That person would be WRONG because this administration is the most transparent and ethical in the history of the USofKKKA. It must be true since Obama said it himself.
Transparent ethics starts at 14 seconds in.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXWTdTnhebs[/youtube]

In case you forgot, you are the dumbass who supported Bush through two stupid wars and 8 years of presidency while his father sat holding hands with Bin Ladens on 9/11. Profound silence would be your best course of action.

Fat Cat wrote:

unknown wrote:oh,the fight for democracy.

http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-t ... -holdings/

Don't be childish, if you think something underhanded is going on spell it out for us. Ukrainian holding company developing Ukrainian natural gas for domestic consumption and export doesn't strike me as anything wicked. Particularly when Russia likes to use its natural gas supply as a weapon. Why not cut them out of the action and make money? And why not hire western specialists?

DrDonkeyLove wrote:

Fat Cat wrote:

DrDonkeyLove wrote:

unknown wrote:oh,the fight for democracy.

http://burisma.com/hunter-biden-joins-t ... -holdings/

Move along, nothing to see here.

One might think that allowing the son of the VPofUSA to have a financial interest in this tinderbox might show a scintilla of a conflict of interest that just might compromise the USA's noble position as a fair arbiter. That person would be WRONG because this administration is the most transparent and ethical in the history of the USofKKKA. It must be true since Obama said it himself.
Transparent ethics starts at 14 seconds in.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXWTdTnhebs[/youtube]

In case you forgot, you are the dumbass who supported Bush through two stupid wars and 8 years of presidency while his father sat holding hands with Bin Ladens on 9/11. Profound silence would be your best course of action.

I started to become disillusioned with Bush soon after the "win" in Iraq and the wheels of progress started to come off. The implementation of the Patriot Act cooled my enthusiasm as well. I confess that I thought ridding the world of the Hussein family and regime was a good idea (because it was a good idea). My faith in Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rummy, and Condi to have a solid post Iraq victory plan was mistaken. The Bush admin is the main reason I left the Repuglican party in 2007 and began following the Andy doctrine of hating both cesspool parties.

That doesn't obviate the fact that it's not productive to have the VP's family having financial skin in the Ukraine mess.

Fat Cat wrote:

Smet wrote:http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/fe ... ilent.aspx

It seems that to the US government, facts simply do not matter. In pre-February 22 Kiev, the legitimate government was warned against using any force to put down an armed revolt. That rebellion, now in power, is actually encouraged by the US to use military force against civilians in eastern Ukraine.

In fact, the US administration has called these military operations against unarmed civilians "proportionate and reasonable." US Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, who had just two months ago cheered on armed protesters seeking to overthrow the elected government in Kiev and warned that government against any response to the violent protests, was singing a different tune now that the US-backed insurgents have attained power. As Ukrainian military forces launched a bloody operation last week in the eastern city of Slavyansk, she told her UN counterparts that the Kiev "response is reasonable, it is proportional, and frankly it is what any one of our countries would have done in the face of this threat." Even Salon.com is finding it difficult to stomach the odious Samantha Power, calling her a "brazen hypocrite."

I know that, being raised in an oppressive totalitarian regime, expressing your own views was never your strong point but why don't you go ahead and give it a try.